14

Click here to load reader

Capital management under the Solvency II regime

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

1Pre-Conference Workshop material

Capital management under the Solvency II regime

Workshop material

Page 2: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

2Pre-Conference Workshop material

Overview

Capital in Solvency II: A brief review

Drivers of the SCR changes

Drivers of the Own Funds changes

Own Funds and SCR changes: Common Drivers

Emerging risks – and their effect on Capital

SCR and Own Funds: Modelling techniques and tools

Contents of this workshop

Page 3: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

3Pre-Conference Workshop material

Capital in Solvency II

Solvency II prescribes a Capital Requirement (SCR)

Own funds need to be valued by a new methodology

Capital buffer: difference between own funds and SCR

Managing this buffer is today’s topic

A brief review

Page 4: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

4Pre-Conference Workshop material

Drivers of the SCR changes

Market conditions

Growth of Business

Investment strategies

Risk Mitigation

Emerging risks

Page 5: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

5Pre-Conference Workshop material

Own Funds and SCR changes

Market conditions

Investment strategies

Risk Mitigation

Common drivers and their impact

Page 6: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

6Pre-Conference Workshop material

Emerging risks

What are emerging risks

How capital management should treat emerging risks

Examples (to follow on dedicated slides)

Free discussion (to be held offline)

and their effect on Capital

Page 7: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

7Pre-Conference Workshop material

SCR and Own Funds I

Standard Formula (Partial) Internal models Examples (to follow on dedicated slides) Free discussion on tools used or considered (to be held offline)

Modelling techniques and tools

Page 8: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

8Pre-Conference Workshop material

SCR and Own Funds II

Simple to implement and is obligatory to use Automatically supports consistency with Own Funds calculation (e.g. Technical Provisions) SCR is calculated by formulae calibrated at 99.5% confidence for the majority of the insurance industry No option to assess other confidence levels Might not capture all (emerging) risks Doesn't give sufficient insight into the drivers of the capital requirements for capital management purposes

Standard Formula

Page 9: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

9Pre-Conference Workshop material

SCR and Own Funds III

An internal model is a complex solution covering all risks faced by the Undertaking A Partial Internal Model combines an Internal Model for the most relevant risks with the Standard Formula for the rest Can be used to value Own Funds – if not used that way, consistency of methodologies must be evidenced Reflects the Undertaking's view of the risk landscape Gives a better understanding of the risks taken and supports business decisions

(Partial) Internal Model

Page 10: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

10Pre-Conference Workshop material

Examples

ORSA requirements, business decisions (e.g. growth, a new product of termination of one)

Changes in investment policiesManagement of underwritten portfolioUnderlying asset management (e.g. Unit Linked)Cost of capital changes

Emerging risks, e.g. catastrophes not related to the Underwriting risks (Fukushima scenario)

SCR & Own Funds changes and their modelling

Page 11: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

11Pre-Conference Workshop material

Example 1

Reinsurance is a major technique of Risk Mitigation (Non-proportional) Reinsurance treaties are often not handled fully by the Standard Formula Impact of Underwriting Risk on e.g. Sliding Scale Ceding Commissions cannot be captured in the Standard Formula Discussion to be held under blog post http://blog.functionalfinances.com/?p=15

Underwriting risk – Reinsurance impact

Page 12: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

12Pre-Conference Workshop material

Example 2

Underwriting will always depend on risk appetite and available capital Simulating future Underwriting needs a reactive model also taking into account Capital Requirement changes Standard Formula based calculation will give limited insight Discussion to be held under blog post http://blog.functionalfinances.com/?p=17

Simulating Capital driven Underwriting

Page 13: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

13Pre-Conference Workshop material

Example 3

Many insurance products having some underlying asset (e.g. Unit Linked) Capital requirement for Market Risk will cover changes of the value of the Underlying Underwriting policies will be partially Market Risk Capital driven Discussion to be held under blog post http://blog.functionalfinances.com/?p=21

Management of Underlying

Page 14: Capital management under the Solvency II regime

14Pre-Conference Workshop material

Example 4

Emerging risks do not imply a Capital Requirement Still, it is the best to quantify the possible Capital Impact of such risks materializing By the very construction, Standard Formula cannot be used An Internal Model reflecting the current risk profile is also insufficient Discussion to be held under blog post http://blog.functionalfinances.com/?p=26

Emerging risks