28
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved CHAPTER 8 Risk Analysis, Real Options, and Capital Budgeting

Chap008

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Chap008

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

CHAPTER

8 Risk Analysis, Real Options, and

Capital Budgeting

Page 2: Chap008

Slide 2

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Chapter Outline

8.1 Sensitivity Analysis, Scenario Analysis, and Break-Even Analysis

8.2 Monte Carlo Simulation

8.3 Real Options

8.4 Decision Trees

Page 3: Chap008

Slide 3

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

8.1 Sensitivity, Scenario, and Break-Even

• Each allows us to look behind the NPV number to see how stable our estimates are.

Page 4: Chap008

Slide 4

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Sensitivity, Scenario, and Break-Even

The projected cash flow often goes unmet in practice, and the firm ends up with a money loser.

Page 5: Chap008

Slide 5

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

• Sensitivity analysis examines how sensitive a particular NPV calculation is to changes in underlying assumptions.

• Revenues: Depends on three assumptions - market share, size of jet engine market, and price per engine.

• Costs: Total cost before taxes =Variable cost + Fixed cost

Page 6: Chap008

Slide 6

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Sensitivity Analysis and Scenario Analysis

• A table such as Table 8.3 can be used for a number of purposes:– It can indicate whether NPV analysis should

be trusted – It shows where more information is needed

Page 7: Chap008

Slide 7

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Sensitivity Analysis and Scenario Analysis

• The effect of incorrect estimates on revenues is so much greater than the effect of incorrect estimates on costs, more information on the factors determining revenues might be needed.

Page 8: Chap008

Slide 8

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Sensitivity Analysis and Scenario Analysis

• However, sensitivity analysis suffers from some drawbacks:– It may unwittingly increase the false sense of

security among managers; it treats each variable in isolation.

• Managers frequently perform scenario analysis to minimize this problem.

Page 9: Chap008

Slide 9

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Break-Even Analysis

• This approach determines the sales needed to break even.

• It is a useful complement to sensitivity analysis, because it also sheds light on the severity of incorrect forecasts.

Page 10: Chap008

Slide 10

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Break-Even Analysis

• Accounting Profit – (Fixed costs + Depreciation)*(1-Tc)

(Sales price-Variable costs)*(1-Tc)

– Contribution margin: It is the amount that each additional engine contributes to pre-tax profit.

Page 11: Chap008

Slide 11

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Break-Even Analysis

• EAC = Initial Investment / 5-year annuity factor at 15%

• (Fixed costs + Depreciation)*(1-Tc) =

Fixed costs *(1-Tc) + Depreciation)*(1-Tc) =

Fixed costs *(1-Tc) + 【 Depreciation -Depreciation*Tc】

• Fixed costs *(1-Tc) + 【 EAC - Depreciation*Tc 】

Page 12: Chap008

Slide 12

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Break-Even Analysis

• Present Value Break-Even Point:

• Fixed costs*(1-Tc) + 【 EAC -Depreciation*Tc 】 (Sales price-Variable costs)*(1-Tc)

Page 13: Chap008

Slide 13

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Break-Even Analysis

– The EAC of $447.5 million is greater than the yearly depreciation of $300 million, because we implicitly assume that the $1,500 million investment could have been invested at 15%.

Page 14: Chap008

Slide 14

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Break-Even Analysis

• Depreciation understates the true costs of recovering the initial investment. Thus Companies that break even on an accounting basis are really losing money. They are losing the opportunity cost of the initial investment.

Page 15: Chap008

Slide 15

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

8.3 Real Options

• NPV analysis ignores the adjustments that a firm can make after a project is accepted. These adjustments are called real options. Thus, NPV underestimates the true value of a project.

Page 16: Chap008

Slide 16

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

• One of the fundamental insights of modern finance theory is that options have value.

• Because corporations make decisions in a dynamic environment, they have options that should be considered in project valuation.

Page 17: Chap008

Slide 17

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Options

• The Option to Expand– Has value if demand turns out to be higher

than expected.

Page 18: Chap008

Slide 18

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

• The Option to Abandon– Managers also have the option to abandon

existing projects. Abandonment can often save companies a great of money.Thus, the option to abandon increases the value of any potential project.

– Abandonment options are pervasive in the real world.

Page 19: Chap008

Slide 19

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

• Timing Options – They have value if the underlying variables

are changing with a favorable trend.

Page 20: Chap008

Slide 20

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Discounted CF and Options

• We can calculate the market value of a project as the sum of the NPV of the project without options and the value of the managerial options implicit in the project.

M = NPV + Opt

A good example would be comparing the desirability of a specialized machine versus a more versatile machine. If they both cost about the same and last the same amount of time, the more versatile machine is more valuable because it comes with options.

Page 21: Chap008

Slide 21

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

8.4 Decision Trees

Two decisions:

1.Whether to develop and test the solar-powered jet engine.

2.Whether to invest for full-scale production following the results of the test.

Page 22: Chap008

Slide 22

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

• A fundamental problem in NPV analysis is dealing with uncertain future outcomes.

• Warning: Perhaps a higher discount rate should have been used for the initial test-marketing decision.

Page 23: Chap008
Page 24: Chap008
Page 25: Chap008
Page 26: Chap008
Page 27: Chap008
Page 28: Chap008