25
Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Professor of Economics James Madison University [email protected] http://cob.jmu.edu/rosserjb

Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Future of Post Keynesian Economics session at 12th International Conference

Citation preview

Page 1: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian

EconomicsJ. Barkley Rosser, Jr.

Professor of EconomicsJames Madison University

[email protected]://cob.jmu.edu/rosserjb

Page 2: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Why Might Post Keynesian Economics not be Complex or Behavioral?

• Terzi and Davidson (separate papers) argue (JPKE, 2010) that Talebian black swans, Knightianuncertainty, and behavioral economics based on post-Walrasian (i.e. “complexity”) economics all assume ergodic system and thus this uncertainty is merely epistemological.

• Risk versus uncertainty• However, many models based on these make no

such assumption. Non-ergodic complexity can be ontological foundation of uncertainty, which leads to behavioral economics as response.

Page 3: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Keynes and Behavioral Economics

• Keynes clearly described economic agents using behavioral heuristics and rules, not always rationally, in the face of uncertainty.

• “Better to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally.” (GT, p. 158)

• Beauty contest and herd dynamics• Loss aversion• Hyperbolic discounting• Conventions (rules of thumb) and “conventual valuation”• Animal spirits• Bounded rationality

Page 4: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

What is Complexity?

• Meta-Complexity

• Dynamic, Computational, Structural, Others

• The 4 C’s of Dynamic Complexity

• 1) Cybernetics

• 2) Catastrophe Theory

• 3)Chaos Theory

• 4) Agent-Based Dynamic Complexity

Page 5: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 6: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 7: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 8: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Figure 5: Fractal basin boundaries for three magnets

Page 9: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 10: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 11: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 12: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Herbert Simon and Bounded Rationality

• Administrative Behavior, 1947 (influence of Commons)• “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” 1955, QJE• Models of Man, 1957• Limits due to information, problem of infinite regress

(Conlisk, “Why Bounded Rationality?” 1956, JEL; problem of “planification” versus “planning”)

• Limits due to computation (Simon as Father of Artificial Intelligence, Sciences of the Artificial, 1969)

• Satifisficing (not just minimizing information cost, Stigler, 1961, evolutionary adaptation)

• ID problem, search for solutions, evaluate solutions in light of satisficing, from substantive to procedural rationality (1976)

Page 13: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Heuristics for Procedural Rationality

• Trial and error

• Imitation

• Follow authority

• Unmotivated search

• Hunch

• (Pingle and Day, 1996, “Modes of Economizing Behavior: Experimental Evidence,” JEBO.

Page 14: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Imitation and Bubbles

• Bounded rationality and foundations of behavioral finance

• Imitation heuristic central to formation of speculative bubbles

• Herding dynamics and heterogeneous agents

• Bubbles and skew functions (Simon, 1955, Biometrika), or fat tails and kurtosis

• Chaotic bubbles (Day and Huang, 1990)

• Minsky-Kindleberger-Shiller view

Page 15: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Figure 2: stylized representation of a bubble produced by rational bubbles

Figure 3: a stylized representation of a bubble produced by interacting heterogeneous agents. It can be

asymmetric but it falls much slower than the rational bubble.

Figure 4: a stylized representation of a bubble with a crash preceded by a period of financial distress.

Page 16: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 17: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Housing Prices in US, Case-Shiller Index, 1987-2011

Page 18: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

: Dow-Jones Industrial Average, 200-2011, Daily Data

Page 19: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Increase in J. The two time series share the same random numbers and same parameters but J. In the grey time series J = 0.5; in the black time series J = 3.

Page 20: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

The Meaning of Hierarchical Complexity

• Simon on hierarchical complexity (“The Architecture of Complexity,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1962)

• Question of Decomposibility

• Link to evolution (Crutchfield, “When Evolution is Revolution --- The Origins of Innovation,” 2003)

• Emergence Question: From Mill to Lewes to Morgan to Kauffman

Page 21: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics
Page 22: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Adaptation and Bounded Rationality• Alchian, 1950• Nelson and Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory

of Economic Change• Selten, “Aspiration Adaptation Theory,” Journal of

Mathematical Psychology, 1998; later work with Gigerenzer

• Quantal response equilibria: McKelvey and Palfrey (1995)

• Consistent expectations equilibria: Hommes-Sorger, Hommes-Rosser (1998, 2001)

Page 23: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Figure 3 here: Gordon-Schaefer-Clark Fishery Model

Page 24: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Figure 4: Learning to believe in chaos

Page 25: Implications of Complex Behavioral Economics for Post Keynesian Economics

Conclusions

• Complexity as foundation of bounded rationality

• Behavioral response is emphasis on satisficing.

• Use of heuristics for procedural rationality

• Evolutionary adaptation and complexity in a world of fundamental Keynesian uncertainty