38
© 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk Robert Gardner, Redington David Collinson, Pension Corporation Investment Implications of RPI to CPI 13 March 2012

Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

© 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Robert Gardner, Redington David Collinson, Pension Corporation

Investment Implications

of RPI to CPI

13 March 2012

Page 2: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

The Inflation basket

1 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

RPI:

+ Financial Services

Page 3: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

RPI vs. CPI

2 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Why it’s happened

• CPI is BoE’s

benchmark for the

whole economy

• Only 7% of

pensioners have an

outstanding

mortgage

•(Reduce public

pension liabilities...)

1

2

3

Standard Deviation:

•RPI 1.58

•CPI 1.15

Source: ONS

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Jan 2000

Jan 2001

Jan 2002

Jan 2003

Jan 2004

Jan 2005

Jan 2006

Jan 2007

Jan 2008

Jan 2009

Jan 2010

Jan 2011

Jan 2011

Perc

en

tag

e

RPI (y/y) CPI (y/y)

Page 4: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

How it’s happened

3 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Public sector

• Pensions in payment increases indexed to CPI,

• capped at 5%

Private

• No mandatory statutory override

• No enabling modification power

• No CPI underpin required

• New pension consultation requirement

Page 5: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Risk management UK inflation – the long run

Long run difference • Aggregate price changes

• Mathematical formula

• 2010 formula effect to persist

• Permanent 0.3% difference implied

• Long-run estimate of 1.2% “wedge”.

4 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Formula effect

Source: ONS

Page 6: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

• Sharp fall in both

RPI and CPI since

September 2011

• RPI at 3.9% in

January vs. 3.6%

for CPI

• Spread at narrowest

since early 2010

Risk management UK inflation - January 2012

5 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

CPI and RPI down

Source: ONS, Redington

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Perc

en

tag

e

RPI (y/y) CPI (y/y)

Page 7: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Risk management Hedging inflation

6 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Finding relative value

Source: Bloomberg, Redington

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

%

30-Year Gilt Real Yield 30-Year Swap Real Yield Swap Spread (Swap Yield - Gilt Yield)

Page 8: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Risk management Hedging CPI Swaps Pricing*

7 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

• 20 year RPI 3.475% - 3.575%

• (Mid – 3.525% and 5bp spread)

• 30 Year RPI 3.927% - 3.655%

• (Mid – 3.605% and 5bp spread)

• Vs

• 20 year CPI 2.852% - 3.252%

• (Mid – 3.052% and 20bp spread)

• 30 Year CPI 2.927% - 3.327%

• (Mid – 3.127% and 20bp spread)

RPI/CPI spread

• 20 year CPI Mid – 3.052% and 20 year RPI

Mid – 3.525%

• = -0.473% with at least 20bps spread.

• 30 year CPI Mid – 3.127% and 30 year RPI

Mid – 3.605%

• = -0.478% with at least 20bps spread.

Source: RBS

Page 9: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Risk management Hedging inflation

8 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Hedging CPI

Physical assets

• CPI-linked gilts?

• Flight Plan

Consistent Assets

(FPCA)

• CPI bond market...?

CPI

Page 10: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Risk management Alternative Sources of CPI

9 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

GB

P M

illi

on

s

Years

Initial investment

Attractive real returns

Inflation-linked cashflows

Providing a match for liabilities

Inflows

Outflows

Source: Redington

Flight Plan Consistent Asset – Example Cashflow Profile

Page 11: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Risk management Alternative Sources of CPI

10 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Source: Evolution Securities, Redington

Most Risk Least Risk

Inherent

Sector Risk

Pricing

Mechanism

Satellites Generation

Ports

Environmental Renewables Airports

Storage Pipelines

Distribution Masts

Water Transmission

Bridges/Tunnels Rail

Defence Roads Transport

Education Healthcare

Social Housing

Page 12: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

11

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Forecast Q4 2011

Longevit y Swaps

Pension Insurance buy-out

Development of the insurance market for pensions in the UK since 2004

Source: PC analysis, LCP Buyout Report 2010, Hymans Robertson 2010 and H1 2011

Update

1) 2009 figures include £1.9bn RSA longevity transaction completed in July 2009

Page 13: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Reaction of schemes looking to de-risk

• How does this impact us?

– In payment : RPI generally hard-coded

– In deferment : reference to statutory revaluation

• ETVs and PIE exercises put on hold

• Buy-in / Buy-out decisions delayed

12 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Page 14: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Pension scheme view of CPI vs. RPI

13 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Page 15: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Expectations of RPI to CPI gap

14

Party / Source RPI-CPI assumption

The Office for Budget Responsibility, Economic and

Fiscal outlook of March 2011

1.2%

FTSE350 Pension Fund accounting disclosures,

Hymans Robertson’s 2011 survey

0.7% to 2.8%

Mercer briefing July 2011 0.5% to 0.8%

Investment Bank instruments 0.1% to 0.2%

Our survey See later slides

Page 16: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Insurer view of CPI vs. RPI

15 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Page 17: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

RPI v CPI: Historic differences

• The average annual RPI-CPI gap from May 1997 to July 2011 was 0.88%

• Annualised standard deviation of monthly observed RPI-CPI basis was

1.27%

• RPI was above CPI for 85% of the period

– Main period of negative RPI-CPI due to rapid mortgage cost inflation

reduction over 2008

16

Page 18: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

RPI v CPI density function

17

Histogram of RPI-CPI since May 1997 and approximated density function

Abnormal – e.g. falling interest rates

mean of – 2.9% (CPI higher)

Normal : mean of 1.1%

(RPI higher)

Page 19: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

RPI vs. CPI – stochastic simulation – no underpin

18 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Source: Barrie and Hibbert

Page 20: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

RPI vs. CPI – stochastic simulation – with underpin!

19 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Source: Barrie and Hibbert

Page 21: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

CPI, RPI and base rates

20 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Page 22: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Hedge with RPI – implications for insurers

• 1 in 200 year test – capital requirements

– statistical variation

– changes in the basket of goods

– changes in calculation methodology

– political influence

• Shock effects if CPI market develops differently

• Impact of caps and floors:

– Volatility of CPI is lower than RPI

– So floor and cap both less likely to bite? Net impact?

21 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Page 23: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Hedge with CPI

22 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

• Investment Bank A : CPI vs RPI = 0.1%

• Investment Bank B : CPI v RPI = 0.2%

• Capacity available : Small

Instrument Approx market size

Indexed RPI gilts £270 bn

Indexed RPI bonds £30 bn

RPI Inflation swaps £100 bn

CPI linked Virtually nil

Page 24: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Insurer solutions

• Insure on CPI but small discount to RPI

– Benefits indexed to CPI

– Expected CPI under-run

– Offset by cost of risk capital

• Option to move from RPI to CPI in future

– In anticipation of CPI market opening up in future

– Part refund of premium

– To whom – scheme or company

– On a buy-in or buy-out?

• Differential pricing?

23 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Page 25: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

But general market movements more significant

24 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

• Chart shows ‘overall affordability’ for a scheme with a blend of deferred and pensioner liabilities, and

invested in a 55% equities / 45% bonds mix. ‘Affordability’ considers the cost of insuring the pension

risk compared to the value of the assets held by the scheme. A higher value in the index means that

insurance is more affordable for pension schemes (insurance costs have fallen and / or asset values

have risen)

• Bulk annuity affordability plunged during the second half of 2011, primarily due to ultra-low Gilt yields,

but equities also dragged down funding positions

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

Fundin

g level in

% Affordability

Page 26: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Redington – Pension Corporation Survey 112 Actuaries and Trustees between May and October 2011

25 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

• Overwhelming majority of schemes vulnerable to future

inflation increases

• Less than 20% of defined benefit pension schemes surveyed

had at least 50% of their inflation-linked pensions backed with

inflation-linked assets such as index-linked gilts

• General inflation risk a much greater risk to most schemes

than CPI/RPI basis risk

Key Findings / Conclusions

Page 27: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Our survey says...

© 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Page 28: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

1. What proportion of inflation-linked liabilities are matched

with inflation hedging assets such as index-linked gilts,

inflation swaps or buy-in insurance policies:

27 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Based on responses from 88 Actuaries

and 13 Trustees

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0% - 25% 25% - 50% 50% - 75% 75% - 100%

Proportion of matching assets

Actuaries Trustees

Page 29: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

2. To Trustees: Does your scheme specify statutory

minimum revaluation / indexation, i.e. could the scheme

automatically move to CPI?

28 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Yes No

"Statutory minimum" specified

Revaluation in deferment Benefit indexation in payment

Based on responses from 21 trustees

Page 30: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

3. To Trustees: Will your scheme move to CPI (rather than

retain RPI):

29 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

Based on responses from 20 trustees

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Yes No

Proportion of schemes

Revaluation in deferment Benefit indexation in payment

Page 31: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

4. In your view is it fair that schemes that can move to CPI

should move to CPI?

30 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Yes No

Actuaries

Trustees

Based on responses from 85 Actuaries

and 23 Trustees

Page 32: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

5. What is your long term expectation for CPI inflation

relative to RPI inflation:

31 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Same as RPI

c.0.5% p.a. less than RPI

c.0.5% to 1% p.a. less than RPI

1% to 2% less than RPI

Actuaries Trustees

Based on responses from 89 Actuaries

and 23 Trustees

Page 33: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following do

you think your schemes consider seriously over the next

3 years:

32 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Unlikely Likely Almost certainly

a. Liability Management Exercise

Actuaries

Trustees

Based on responses from 87 Actuaries

and 22 Trustees

Page 34: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following do

you think your schemes consider seriously over the next

3 years:

33 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Unlikely Likely Almost certainly

b. Longevity Swap

Actuaries

Trustees

Based on responses from 86 Actuaries

and 21 Trustees

Page 35: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following do

you think your schemes consider seriously over the next

3 years:

34 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Unlikely Likely Almost certainly

c. Buy-in/Buy-out

Actuaries

Trustees

Based on responses from 87 Actuaries

and 23 Trustees

Page 36: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

35 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

d. Other:

“Journey planning / flight path / de-risking triggers”

“Phased buy-in, via annuity purchase when members retire”

“Closing to future accrual (for those few schemes still open)”

“Increase in LDI assets”

“Winding up”

“More bonds”

6. Of possible de-risking options, which of the following do

you think your schemes consider seriously over the next

3 years:

Page 37: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Survey Results

36 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

7. What impact has the CPI move had on schemes

considering de-risking?

“Little / None”

“Potential reduction in Buy-out cost. Slightly more scope to exchange

pension increases. Some offset CPI gains through lower risk investment

strategy”

“Caused delays to some looking at buy-in/out because insurers have

been unable to provide CPI pricing”

“As far as I am aware [public sector schemes] are not looking to derisk,

other than via wholesale benefit changes following Huttons report”

Page 38: Investment Implications of RPI to CPI

Questions or comments?

37 © 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk

David Collinson

• Co-Head of Business Origination

• Pension Corporation

[email protected]

• Tel: + 44 20 7105 2110

Robert Gardner

• Co-Chief Executive

• Redington

[email protected]

• Tel: + 44 20 7250 3416

In addition...

http://twitter.com/robertjgardner

http://uk.linkedin.com/in/robertjgardner