8
Rural Housing Affordability February 2017 Oregon Office of Economic Analysis

Rural Housing Affordability

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Rural Housing Affordability

Rural Housing Affordability

February 2017

Oregon Office of Economic Analysis

Page 2: Rural Housing Affordability

Oregon Office of

Economic Analysis2

Overall Rural Affordability is Better, but not Everywhere

Median Price to Income Ratio:Rural – 2.4Urban – 2.9

10% least affordable rural counties face equivalent of 20% least affordable urban counties

Page 3: Rural Housing Affordability

Oregon Office of

Economic Analysis3

Regional Patterns Stand Out Rural Housing Affordability (Price to Income Ratio)

Data: American Community Survey, 2011-2015 Estimates

Source: Census, Oregon Office of Economic AnalysisMap Template: www.clearlyandsimply.com

60-80th Percentile

(2.5-3.1)

80-90th Percentile

(3.1-3.7)

90th+ Percentile

(>3.7)

Urban County

< 20th Percentile

(<1.9)

20-40th Percentile

(1.9-2.2)

40-60th Percentile

(2.2-2.5)

Page 4: Rural Housing Affordability

Oregon Office of

Economic Analysis4

Rural Oregon is Expensive

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Nu

mb

er

of

Co

un

tie

s

Rural America Housing AffordabilityMedian Home Value to Median Household Income Ratio

Source: Census (2011-2015 American Community Survey), Oregon Office of Economic Analysis

Price to Income Ratio

Morrow (2.4, 52nd)

Gilliam, Harney (2.7, 68th)

Umatilla (3.0, 78th)

Jefferson (3.2, 83rd)

Wheeler (3.4, 86th)

Baker, Malheur (3.6, 88th)

Sherman, Union (3.7, 90th)

Klamath, Grant (3.8, 91st)

Lake, Wasco (4.0, 93rd)

Douglas (4.1, 94th)

Coos (4.4, 95th)

Crook (4.5, 95th)

Wallowa (5.0, 97th)

Lincoln, Tillamook (5.2, 98th)

Clatsop, Curry (5.3, 98th)

Hood River (5.8, 99th)

County (Price-Income Ratio, National Percentile)U.S. Rural Median (2.37)

Page 5: Rural Housing Affordability

Oregon Office of

Economic Analysis5

What Drives Affordability Differences?

Page 6: Rural Housing Affordability

Oregon Office of

Economic Analysis6

Rural County Scatter

Page 7: Rural Housing Affordability

Oregon Office of

Economic Analysis7

High Valuations Not All Bad, But Shouldn’t Be Goal of Policy

Flipside of affordability challenges is high values are positive for current homeowners in terms of asset valuations. Not that that should be the goal of housing policy, of course.

More rural households own their homes outright, or with no mortgage.

Potential problem may be ability to sell rural homes in regions facing declining populations and/or underperforming economies.

Page 8: Rural Housing Affordability

Oregon Office of

Economic Analysis8

Contact

[email protected]

(503) 378-3455

[email protected]

(503) 378-4052

www.OregonEconomicAnalysis.com

@OR_EconAnalysis