Upload
world-first
View
705
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Currency and Clinton, Trade and Trump: World First’s US Presidential Election Webinar
26th October
Jeremy CookChief Economist and Head of Currency Strategy
Your Presenter
• Clinton vs Trump• The Electoral College• The Downticket• Who will win?• Currency reactions • Terms of Trade• Implications for US and Global Economics• Conclusions• Questions
The US Election and You
Clinton vs Trump – How did we get here?
• Clinton views her ascent to the Presidency as somewhere between a divine right and a duty to the Democratic Party. Sanders battled hard in the Primary and may have made her tack to the Left to appeal to protest voters. Represents a continuation of the US under the Obama regime with a more involved Foreign Policy.
• Trump is the ultimate protest vote and has spent his short but meteoric political ‘career’ confounding and demolishing expectations. Policy is a moveable feast of populist, nationalist and quixotic ideas that have only a passing resemblance to typical Republican sensibilities.
• Election is between two extremely polarising, dislikeable characters and the campaigns will hopefully mark a nadir in political discourse.
Clinton vs Trump – The Polls
Data courtesy of 538
The Electoral College
The Electoral College
The Electoral College
Data courtesy of 538
Midnight
• Georgia: 16 votesIndiana: 11 votesKentucky: 8 votesSouth Carolina: 9 votesVermont: 3 votesVirginia: 13 votes
0.30am
• North Carolina: 15 votesOhio: 18 votesWest Virginia: 5 votes
Polls closing, exits and results1am
• Alabama: 9 votesConnecticut: 7 votesDelaware: 3 votesDistrict of Columbia: 3 votesFlorida: 29 votesIllinois: 20 votesMaine: 4 votesMaryland: 10 votesMassachusetts: 11 votesMississippi: 6 votesMissouri: 10 votesNew Hampshire: 4 votesNew Jersey: 14 votesOklahoma: 7 votesPennsylvania: 20 votesRhode Island: 4 votesTennessee: 11 votes
1.30am
• Arkansas: 6 votes
2am
• Colorado: 9 votesKansas: 6 votesLouisiana: 8 votesMichigan: 16 votesMinnesota: 10 votesNebraska: 5 votesNew Mexico: 5 votesNew York: 29 votesNorth Dakota: 3 votesSouth Dakota: 3 votesTexas: 38 votesWisconsin: 10 votesWyoming: 3 votes
3am
• Arizona: 11 votes Iowa: 6 votes Montana: 3 votes Nevada: 6 votes Utah: 6 votes
4am
• California: 55 votesHawaii: 4 votesIdaho: 4 votesOregon: 7 votesWashington: 12 votes
6am
• Alaska: 3 votes
The Downticket
• All House of Representatives members (435) are up for election once again as well as 34 Senate seats and 12 Governors on November 8th.
• Currently the Republican Party holds majorities of 30 seats in the House and 4 in the Senate. A split in the Legislative and Executive branches can lead to policy gridlock, as we have seen in Obama’s 2nd term compared to the 1st, at least until the Midterms
• A Clinton win should allow for a Democratic Senate majority as the correlation has increased between Senate and Presidential voting.
• Democratic control of the House is a much taller order and we doubt it will take place.
Who will win?
Currency and wider market reaction to each candidate
• Clinton win still very much priced into markets with some bellwethers of Trump risk (MXN, Asian manufacturing exporters) riding lower on any increase in polling intention for Trump.
• On the basis of a Clinton win we anticipate a slight run lower for the USD, JPY and EUR as investors bid up EM risk on lower risk aversion sentiment. GBP would likely benefit against the USD but little elsewhere. Shares to rise globally in a brief and uninspiring relief rally.
• A Trump win will see a dramatic jump into perceived risk havens at the expense of risk, commodity, emerging and frontier currencies. RUB may outperform.
• Given the relative pricing of markets compared to Brexit, a 5-8% jump in the value of USD upon the announcement of a Trump is entirely possible.
• My trades list for a Trump win is: sell Mexico, CE3, Asian manufacturing exporters, domestic Korea, domestic Taiwan; buy gold miners, Russia, domestic China, energy.
Terms of trade under each candidate• Trump has been outspoken on many
things during the campaign but trade has been a long-held position of confrontation.
• We foresee a ‘trade war’ with China over tariffs, currency levels, jobs and investment and with Mexico over immigration and the wall.
• May allow for freer flow of funds back into the country from foreign domiciled US companies.
• Clinton has changed her mind on TPP and TTIP to now oppose having been a vocal proponent.
China
Canada
Mexico
Japan
Germany
South Korea
United Kingdom
FranceIndia
Italy
Netherlands
Brazil
Belgium
Switzerla
nd
Singapore
Ireland
Malaysia
Vietnam
Saudi Arabia
Thailand
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
Total Trade with US ($M)
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
The US and Global economic outlook under each candidate
• Higher protectionist measures, thereby a cut in globalisation, typically will lead to an increase in inflation and a slowing of growth
• Both Clinton and Trump have advocated fiscal policy measures in an effort to boost growth but that is where the similarities end. Although fiscal plans, most notably Trump’s, have had some modifications in recent days, the general picture is one of more aggressive fiscal expansion under Trump, largely through tax cuts (both income and corporate), than under Clinton.
• Congressional picture for tax cuts (Trump) and education and healthcare spending (Clinton) are crucial
• Expansionary fiscal policy is likely to tighten the US output gap, increase inflationary pressure and invite tighter monetary policy (higher interest rates) although this is dependent on the relation with the Federal Reserve.
Conclusions• We foresee a Clinton win by a bit of a landslide in the Electoral College but a tougher deal in the
popular vote
• As seen with Brexit a ‘black swan’ event cannot be completely priced out of markets and remains a very real possibility with a fortnight of the campaign to go
• Markets have never appropriately priced Trump risk and a win for the Republican candidate would be a larger global market shock than that of Brexit
• We are moving to a global conversation of looser fiscal policy in Western economies and this will take place under either candidate
• A trade war is the last thing that the global economy needs right now
Questions
• These comments are the views and opinions of the author and should not be construed as advice. You should act using your own information and judgment.
• Whilst information has been obtained from and is based upon multiple sources the author believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy and it may be incomplete or condensed.
• All opinions and estimates constitute the author’s own judgment as of the date of the briefing and are subject to change without notice.
• Any rates given are ‘interbank’ i.e. for amounts of £5million or more thus are not indicative of the rates offered by World First. World First UK is registered in England and Wales as a Limited Company: No 05022388 and is authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN:900508, under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 for the issuing of electronic money. World First Markets Limited is registered in England and Wales as a Limited Company: No 06382377 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN:477561. Registered office address Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London SW1P 4QP.
• World First USA Inc is registered in the USA (Delaware State Division of Corporations file number: 4971976) and is registered as a Money Services Business in the United States with FinCEN (MSB Registration Number: 31000050721375) and is a registered non-depository financial institution with the National Mortgage Licensing System (NMLS# 1018479). World First USA, Inc is also registered in Canada with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Center of Canada registration number M11393445 and is licensed to conduct spot and forward foreign currency transactions on behalf of Canada.
• THESE SCENARIOS SHOULD NOT BE USED TO PREDICT FUTURE RETURNS. The company will not be liable for any loss as a result of reliance on information contained in this document.
Disclaimers