16
Results-Based-Funding Case Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean José Gabriel Castillo Fund Portfolio Manager Latin America and the Caribbean

Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

José Gabriel Castillo, Fund Portfolio Manager for Latin America and the Caribbean, presented the following case studies on results-based funding (RBF, sometimes called performance-based funding or PBF) at the OECD Technical Workshop on Results-Based Funding, 19-20 May 2014, given together with the German Development Institute (DIE). The workshop was overseen by the DAC Network on Development Evaluation in conjunction with DIE. The DAC Network on Development Evaluation (EVALNET) contributes to better development results using evaluation to build a strong evidence base for policy making and for learning. More on DIE: http://www.die-gdi.de/en/ More on EVALNET: http://www.oecd.org/development/evaluation/

Citation preview

Page 1: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Results-Based-Funding Case

Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central

America and the Caribbean

José Gabriel CastilloFund Portfolio ManagerLatin America and the Caribbean

Page 2: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean
Page 3: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Where the problem is:

Page 4: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

P86 and P110 of 2013 World Malaria Report

Page 5: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Opportunities

Page 6: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Expected TargetsIndicator Country Base Y1 Y2 Y3Malaria confirmed cases Belize 37 <70 <50 <30

Malaria confirmed cases Costa Rica 8 <50 <20 <10

Malaria confirmed cases El Salvador 21 <50 <10 <10

Malaria confirmed cases Panama 844 <1400 15% 25%

Malaria confirmed cases Guatemala 5346 <8100 20% 30%

Malaria confirmed cases Honduras 6430 <8000 10% 15%

Malaria confirmed cases Nicaragua 1235 <1050 20% 20%

Malaria confirmed cases Mexico 797 Elimination

Malaria confirmed cases Haiti 20468 <29200 10% 20%

Malaria confirmed cases Dominican Republic 603 <525 20% 20%

Page 7: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Impact in the Central America and Caribbean Region

Build on existing results and trends in the region• MESO/Hispaniola: 3 countries <100 cases, 4 countries

<2,000 cases, 3> 2000 cases

Is it possible to accelerate this trend?• Political commitment• National allocations in NFM for obtaining more impact as fast

as possible• Expected support from international actors and neighbor

countries• Coordinating actions with non-eligible countries• Supporting research on elimination / evaluation

7

Page 8: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Multicountry collaboration?

• Subregions (Mesoamérica, Hispaniola)

• Declaration of COMISCA on elimination

• Elimination more complex in isolation

• Efficiency in use of resources– several countries supporting common objective

• Multicountry cooperation and synergies

8

Page 9: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

EMMIE:

Fuente: Organizacion Mundial de la Salud (2013)

Page 11: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

14

Q2-2014- Disbursement of start-up funds $200,000 to six countries and

reprogramming of existing funds in other countries

2020- 2025 Zero local cases in 2020. Evaluation processCertification towards 2025.

Q1-2015

- Countries present 2014 results- External verification applied- Baseline confirmed

Q1-2016 - Countries present 2015 results, verification of results and application of reward procedure (COD).

Q1-2017- Countries present 2016 results, verification of results and application of

reward procedure (COD).- .

Mar-2014 - Signature of grant

2018-2019 - New allocations and support from third parties.

EMMIE

Page 12: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Governance Updated on 7 March 2014

38%

27%

24%

12%

*

USAID

MEG

Carter

National Malaria Programs

Evaluation

Data Sharing

Coordination

Fund Transfer No existing malaria grant w ith TGF

Reporting Line

Technical Assistance

Costa

Rica *Dominican Republic

Caucaseco

IDB

ISGlobal

CDC

PARTNERS

CHAI

BMGF

PAHO

Colombia

Impl. Impl. Impl. Impl.

Mexico Belize *El

Salvador *

COMISCASE-

COMISCA

SICA

LFA

Impl. Impl.

Evaluation Panel

M & E

Program Mgmt

PSI GUA / PSI

Regional

PSI HTI?

Start-up funds

Prevention

USD 3.2m

Impl.

Panama *Haiti NicaraguaGuatemala Honduras

GIZ

Technical Advisory Group

The Global Fund Secretariat

RCM

Page 13: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

What is expected from CoD?• Continued commitment from participant

countries.• Incentive based on : reward and “competition”

with neighbor countries.• Common technical support, common visible

goals, common evaluation procedures.• Attract further incentive funding for countries

advancing faster.• Improve Value for Money in National Allocations.• Lessons Learned for other similar initiatives

Page 14: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Operational Risks: CoD supports the reduction of some associated risks

                                                                                                

1 Programmatic & Performance Risks

2 Financial & Fiduciary Risks

3 Health Services & Products Risks

4 Governance, Oversight &

Management Risks

 

   

 

   

 

1.1 Limited Program Relevance

2.1 Low Absorption or Over-

commitment

3.1 Treatment Disruptions

4.1 Inadequate CCM Governance

& Oversight

 

   

 

 1.2 Inadequate M&E and Poor Data Quality

2.2 Poor Financial Efficiency

3.2 Substandard Quality of Health

Products

4.2 Inadequate PR Governance

& Oversight

 

    

 1.3 Not Achieving Grant Output Targets

2.3 Fraud, Corruption or Theft of Funds

3.3 Poor Quality of Health Services

4.3 Inadequate PR/SR Reporting

& Compliance

 

    

 1.4 Not Achieving Program Outcome & Impact

Targets

2.4 Theft or Diversion of Non-Financial

Assets

3.4 Poor Access and Promotion of

Equity & Human Rights

4.4 Inadequate Secretariat and LFA Management & Oversight

 

    

 1.5 Poor Aid Effectiveness and Sustainability

   2.5 Market and Macroeconomic Losses

                                                 

                    Legend          

                                               

                         2.6 Poor Financial Reporting

                Very High   This assessment              

                                          High                

                                      Medium    Previous 

assessment

           

                                                              Low                

                                                              Unknown                          

                                                                                               

Page 15: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

$10.2 M - EMMIE

18

Panama

Nicaragua$4M

Costa Rica

El Salvador

Honduras$7M

Guatemala$18M

Belize

Rep. Domicana.

$6M

Haiti$37M

Mexico

Existing GF grants

Non elegibleElegible Elegible solamente para regional

Additional Resources

Domestic Funding

New NFM allocations

Other donors / technical support

Accelerate efforts

Non eligible countries

Page 16: Achieving impact in the fight against malaria in Central America and the Caribbean

Questions, comments, suggestions,

recommendations?

Thank you!