Upload
mohammad-tawfik
View
743
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Problem definition
• A military training aircraft
• Load factors +6 & -3G
• Two pilots, 105 Kg each
• Baggage 22.5 Kg
• Takeoff distance of 1500 m
• Climb to 5000 m
• Cruise 15 min at a speed of no less than 87 m/s
• Manoeuvre at 103 m/3 for 60 min
• Return to base
• Taxi and parking
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Data Collection
● Data of 30 different aircraft was collected
● Some relations were plotted and
regression relations were calculated
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Thrust History
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Year
T/T
max(2
5.9
8 K
N)
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Empty to Take-off weight
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
Wo (Kg)
Wo
/We
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Wing loading vs aspect ratio
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
AR
L (
Kg
/m^
2)
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Preliminary Sizing
● Using the relations obtained from the data,
equations could be obtained to fill in the
equation
● You obtain a quadratic equation in the
take-off weight which can be solved readily
● The number was 3220 Kg
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Preliminary Sizing
● Similarly, the wing loading could be found
to be: 290 Kg/m2
● From which you get the wing area to be 11
m2
● Which yields and Aspect ratio of 5 and
span of 7.5 m
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Geometric Considerations
● From the data collected, the taper ratio of
0.5 was used
● The distance between the tail and the is,
similarly, taken to be 3 times the mean
wing chord
● For the area of the stabilizers, the volume
ratio was the determinant as per a
reference and taken as 0.7
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Components Weight
● Formulae are given in different references
to estimate the weight of different
components
● What is really important is the weight
distribution
● The distribution of the masses of the
aircraft will be assumed to be regular as
per the external size
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Aerodynamic Performance
Estimation ● The Aerodynamic coefficients may be
evaluated using different methods
● There are simple formulae to determine
them
● You may use some Lattice methods to
estimate the coefficients
● You may solve the full Navier Stokes
equations!
Aero474 Aircraft Design
For the Example
● Selection of the aerofoil was NACA4212
for the wing and NACA0009 for the tail.
● Using Prandtl lifting line theory, the wing
and tail lift coefficients were calculated
● The induced drag coefficient was also
evaluated using the same theory
● Finally, the maximum lift coefficient was
calculated using emperical relations.
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Total Coefficients
● Finally, the total lift, drag, and moment
coefficients were calculated
● BUT … Flight stability literature indicated
that the moment and lift coefficients were
not adequate!
● First modification was to change the tail
incidence angle
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Total Lift
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Alpha
CL tota
l
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Lift-Drag ratio variation with CL
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
CL
CL/C
D
Aero474 Aircraft Design
CL-M curves for different
altitudes
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
M
CL
CL SL
CL 5000
CL 10000
Aero474 Aircraft Design
CRITICAL!!!
● Reviewing those results, it was found that
the lift coefficient at cruise conditions is so
much near the maximum!
● To remedy this problem, the wing loading
was reduced!
● Increasing the area of the wing, changed
EVERYTHING!!!
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Flight Dynamics and Stability
● Now that we have all the aerodynamic
coefficients, we may approach the problem
of dynamics of the aircraft
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Longitudinal Dynamics &
Stability ● The Response for an impulse elevator
input could be plotted using the Runge-
Kutta method
● The two main modes of motion of the
aircraft in longitudinal direction are:
● Phugoid
● Short period
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Third iteration!
● Now, the aircraft need to be modified again!
● However, before doing all that effort again, let's
examine the weight requirements of the fuel
● When recalculating the fuel requirements using
detailed relations for each step of the mission,
the weight was reduced
● That lead to the stability of the aircraft!
● Fuel weight was reduced by more than 50%!!!
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Aerodynamic Refinement
● A VLM code was developed for the
aerodynamic analysis of aircraft
components
● The results obtained for the combined
wing-tail problem gave better estimates for
the aerodynamic characteristics
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Engine Performance
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
M
T (
N)
0
3300
5000
6600
10000
13000
16000
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Max M vs Altitude
0.65 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.81
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
M max
Altitude (
m)
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Time to reach Altitude
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Altitude
Tim
e (
Sec)
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Other Parameters
● Range
● Endurance
● Flight in a horizontal circle
● Take-off runway
● Stall speed
● Time to reach 5000 m
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Forces and Moments
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Y
Vz
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Y
My
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Y
Mx
Aero474 Aircraft Design
Cost Estimates
● Engineering hours
● Tooling hours
● Manufacturing hours
● Quality control hours
● Development Support
● Flight test cost
● Material cost
● Avionics
● Engine