25
Disagreement Management for increasing the organizational performance of Humanity Inc. Ambjörn Naeve Knowledge Management Research The Royal Institute of Technology, and Uppsala University Sweden http:// kmr.nada.kth.se/wiki/Amb TENCompetence Winter School, Innsbruck, 2 February, 2009

Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Harnessing the power of constructive disagreement

Citation preview

Page 1: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Disagreement Managementfor increasing the organizational performance

of Humanity Inc.

Ambjörn NaeveKnowledge Management ResearchThe Royal Institute of Technology,

and Uppsala UniversitySweden

http:// kmr.nada.kth.se/wiki/Amb

TENCompetence Winter School,Innsbruck, 2 February, 2009

Page 2: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Some Techniques for Disagreement ManagementTraditional:

• Violence (war)• Diplomacy• Negotiations• Court trials• Obfuscation (hiding the conflict)• ….

Non-traditional:• Conceptual Calibration• Conceptual Bridging• Distributed Dialog Mapping• Mental Modeling• Systems Modeling• Values Modeling

Page 3: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Sharing

Culture

Knowledge

IntegratingProcess

People

Technology

Management

Knowledge

Continous Learning

Performance Organizational Increased

Functions

is to support the process of integratingpeople-, process-, and technology functionsin order to create a knowledge sharing culturethat supports continous learningaiming for increased organizational performance.

A Major Aim of Knowledge Management

Page 4: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Globally

Information

Age

Recorded Transmitted Annotated

Cuneiformwriting

Gutenbergprinting

Physicallymediated

Electronicallymediated

Archivinglibraries

SemanticWeb

The Globally Annotated Information Age

Page 5: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

• from teacher-centric to learner-centric education.

• from doctor-centric to patient-centric health care.

• from bureaucrat-centric to citizen-centric administration.

• from government-centric to citizen-centric democracy.

• from producer-centric to consumer-centric business models.

enables a shift from knowledge push to knowledge pull:

enables a shift from hierarchy to ”widearchy”:• from opinion registration to opinion publication.

The Semantic Web information architecture

Page 6: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

ModelsExplicitTacit Mental

AssumptionsFeelings Thoughts

Observe

“Maybe space”

Beliefs & Conscious

Act

Mental modeling

Human Cognition

Page 7: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

The Space of Maybe

Ambjörn Naeve, San Francisco, 1976

Page 8: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

The Maybe Spaces of Newton and Einstein

Ambjörn Naeve, San Francisco, 1976

Page 9: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Todayʼs

Web

• the information is distributed• anyone can link anything to anything• but• the information about the information is

• document-based (XML)• centralized (70% in data bases)

• the information about the information is

• graph-based (RDF)• distributed

• anyone can express opinions about anything in a machine-processable context

Semantic

Page 10: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

A Knowledge Manifold

• is a structured information architecture that supports a number of different strategies for information hiding.

• can be considered as a patchwork of knowledge, with a number of linked “knowledge patches,” each with its own knowledge gardener.

• allows the user to ask questions and search for certified live knowledge sources.

• can be used to design learner-centric learning environments (PLEs) that support question-based learning. (“knowledge-pull based on interest”)

Page 11: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Pedagogical principles of the KM architecture

• Nobody can teach you anything. A good teacher can inspire you to learn.

• Your learning is enhanced by taking control of your own learning process.

• Your learning motivation is based on the experience of subject exitement and faith in your learning capacity from a live teacher.

• No ”problematic” questions can be answered in an automated way.• Respect for ignorance can only be upheld when the ignorant person is uneducated.

Page 12: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Seven Knowledge Roles in a Knowledge Manifold• Knowledge Cartographer

• Knowledge Composer

• Knowledge Librarian

• Knowledge Coach

• Knowledge Preacher

• Knowledge Plummer

• Knowledge Mentor

• constructs context-maps.

• fills context-maps with content-components.

• combines content-components into learning modules.

• cultivates questions.

• provides live answers.

• connects questions to relevant preachers.

• supplies motivation and supports self reflection.

Page 13: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

We see the Human Semantic Webas a mixture between

conceptual and pictorial“information landscapes”

that are linked in the structure of

a Knowledge Manifoldand allowing “deep search”

for both concepts, contexts and content

The Human Semantic Web

Page 14: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

The Human Semantic Web (“Web 3.0”)

Concept network

The Conceptual Web

Concept

RDF triple

The Machine Semantic Web

The Web

Conzilla

Page 15: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Content

Contexts

Concept

The Conzilla “Mantra”

Content in Contexts through Concept

= Outsides of Concept

= Inside of Concept= Border between these

Page 16: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Right-clicking on a concept or concept-relation brings up a menu with three choices: Contexts, Content, and Information.

• Selecting Contexts opens a sub-menu, which lists all the other contexts where this concept or concept-relation appears.

• Selecting Content opens a window (to the right) where the content-components of the concept or concept-relation are listed.

• Pointing to a content-component brings up information about it, and double-clicking on a content-component opens another window where the content is shown.

Conzilla (www.conzilla.org)

Page 17: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Disagreement Managementby Conceptual Calibrationfor bottom-up conceptual bridge-building

1. Agreeing on what we agree on.2. Agreeing on what we donʼt agree on.3. Documenting step 1 and step 2

in a way that we agree on.

Greatest advantage:Consensus does not have to be reached.

Source: Naeve, A., (2005) The Human Semantic Web - Shifting from Knowledge Push to Knowledge Pull

Page 18: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

by conceptual bridgingConzilla: Disagreement Management

Page 19: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Conzilla: Disagreement Managementby conceptual bridging

Page 20: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

by distributed dialogue mappingConzilla: Disagreement Management

Page 21: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

by distributed dialogue mappingConzilla: Disagreement Management

Page 22: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Embryo of a global values model

Source: Naeve, A., (2005) The Human Semantic Web - Shifting from Knowledge Push to Knowledge Pull

Page 23: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Some Relevant Papers• Naeve, A., (2001) The Knowledge Manifold – an educationalarchitecture that supports inquiry-based customizableforms of e-learning, 2:nd European Conference on Web-BasedLearning Environments, Lund, October 24-26, 2001.http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/KnowledgeManifolds/KnowledgeManifold.pdf

• Naeve, A., (2001) The Concept Browser, a New Form of Knowledge Management Tool, Proc. of the 2:nd european conference on Web Based Learning Environments, Lund, Oct. 24-26, 2001.http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/ConceptualBrowsing/ConceptBrowser.doc• Naeve, A., (2005), The Human Semantic Web – Shifting from Knowledge Push to Knowledge Pull, International Journal of Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) Vol 1, No. 3, pp. 1-30, July-September 2005, http://kmr.nada.kth.se/papers/SemanticWeb/HSW.pdf

Page 24: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Some Strategically Important Books• Muhammad Yunus (2007): Creating a World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism.• Joel Kurtzman (1993): The Death of Money: How the Electronic Economy has Destabilized the Worldʼs Markets and Created Financial Chaos.

• James Martin (2006): The Meaning of the 21:st Century: A Vital Blueprint for Ensuring our Future.• Michael Shuman (2006): The Small-Mart Revolution: How Local Businesses are Beating the Global Competition.• E. F. Schumacher (1973): Small Is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered.

• George Soros (1998): The Crisis of Global capitalism: Open Society Endangered.

• Peter Senge (1990, 2006): The Fifth Discipline. • Peter Senge, Claus-Otto Scharmer, et. al., (2006): Presence, An Exploration of Profound Change in People, Organizations, and Society

Page 25: Ambjorn on Disagreement Management

Some Conzilla maps (Download Conzilla at www.conzilla.org)

Humanity Inc.:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/humanity-inc/layoutCM#e7e2ec115741c42d0

Ambjörnʼs maps:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/TEL-research-community/presentation/CM#ea00241132f2d1e2c

Threats to - and Possibilites for - the Survival of Humanity:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/humanity-inc/layout/contextmap#3624493c11c88c988e91c2dA Major Aim of Knowledge Management:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/KLM/layoutCM#af678c11586cfeefcSelfish and Unselfish Knowledge:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/humanity-inc/layoutCM#76358a115a4478b6cThe Big Switch:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/humanity-inc/layoutCM#76358a115a4478b6cThe Small-Mart Revolution:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/humanity-inc/layout/contextmap#-210ea64811c80d34cbf19feSystemic Patterns:http://org/conzilla/people/amb/systems-modeling/CM#e919f51133f838881245Asynchronous Public Service:http://www.conzilla.org/people/amb/KLM/layout/contextmap#54ab461511afa5bf6eb