Upload
inge-de-waard
View
791
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AI in Education in need for ethics?
Inge de Waard (at gmail dot com)
Slideshare.net/ignatia
@ignatia
http://ignatiawebs.blogspot.com
Discuss and compare ideas on implementing an ethical layer within Artificial Intelligence for education.
Artificial Intelligence: mathematical models that enable communication, enhanced decision making, semantic reasoning, responding and learning between machines and humans.
Algorithms: a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations. Algorithms are coded into software.
Algorithms enter our homes, work, schools, institutes, habits… but in most cases they are invisible.
AI risks to replicate the norm (filter bubbles prove it).Explained in part by the similar profiles of the creators of these algorithms.
Frank Pasquale (law prof) argued, “authority is increasingly expressed algorithmically.”
Audrey Waters (fab thinker, talking tomorrow) wrote “Algorithms — their development and implementation — are important expressions of power and influence.”
Algocratic governance based on black boxes? Information and software systems rule.
Building an AI that can defeat the human GO/chess champions (alphago created byDeepmind). But does it provide mental athleticwell-being to the Go player? Can it read emotions?
Emotions drive learning.Affective computing is on the rise: computer science, psychology & cognitive science.
AI in formal education: semi-automatedassessments, gamification, learning analytics, predictive analytics, scientific apps, automatedstudent assistants, identity confirmation …
AI in informal learning: browser searches, personal apps, quantified self, learning locker based learning, course suggestions …
Positive scenario
• Primary school assessment reveals a never-gonna-formally-learn student but enthusiastically yells out poems => gets a one-on-one tutor forlanguage, and ultimately learns poetry.
• Pre-school reveals personal skills compatible with satisfaction throughskilled labor. Learning trajectory is provided, mentorship is arranged.
• Humans are enhanced with technology => post-human is evolving andemotions are supported to lead to satisfied lives.
Personal learning paths, enhancing strengths and intrinsic motivation basedon enthusiasm and emotions and personal learning goals …
Negative scenario:
• AI looks only for those profiles that are deemed to be able tocontribute to society. The other humans are second class citizens withless opportunities. Emotions are screened for violent potential.
• AI evolves and looks at humans as an inefficient species (based on existing human-build algorithms coding efficiency and moral codes such as peace must be achieved. Humans are put into reservations toprotect them against themselves. AI develops into space exploringentitities.
Transparency to learn what is happening with AI in e.g. learning analytics and why => ethical rules.
Ethical layer: where do we want to go to as a society? Multiple sided stories?
We interpret the world using our moral compass: a complex set of cultural and philosophical preferences. For or against climate change and sustainable energy.
Maybe an Ethics commission at UN/Unesco. Ethics board every software output company.
Ethics layer on top of AI, reviewing the AI.
Maybe it is just natural to increase the dominant norm? And does not need ethics? History has always kept mostly words from those in power.
Does power always win, or do those win who we want to remember?