Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dayton High School Results
Topics Covered:
What is the STaR Chart?
How our campus rated the 4-Key Areas for 2011-2012
Identify improvements needed for each Key Area
2011-2012 Evaluation
Comparing the last three years
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
Final thoughts for the last three years
What are the STaR Charts?
Texas STaR Charts are a way to help
teachers, campuses, and districts determine if
they are:
1) Making adequate progress towards meeting the
Long-Range Plan for Technology
2) Meeting the technology goals set for the district
Key Area I: Teaching and LearningAreas needing improvement:1) Online Learning
Key Area II: Educator Preparation and Development
Areas needing improvement:1) Models of Professional Development2) Capabilities of Educators3) Professional Development for Online Learning
Key Area III: Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support
Areas needing improvement:1) Instructional Support
Key Area IV: Infrastructure for Technology
Areas needing improvement:1) Students per Computers2) Other Classroom Technology3) Technical Support4) Distance Learning Capacity
How we Rated Overall as a Campus for 2011-2012
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Teaching And LearningEducator Preparation and DevelopmentLeadership, Administration and Instructional SupportInfrastructure for Technology
Areas to Address for 2011-2012
1) Online learning opportunities• For teachers• Students
2) Models of Professional Development3) Capabilities of Educators4) Access to Professional Development5) Professional Development for Online Learning
To access our campus data, click the following link below:http://starchart2.epsilen.com/campusSearchlist.aspx?foryear=20072008&district=Dayton&campus=
To access the Texas STaR web site, click the following link below:http://starchart.epsilen.com/
2009-2010The Last 3 Years
Areas needing improvement:
• Small drop in Leadership, Administrative and Instructional support
• Infrastructure for Technology
2010-2011The Last 3 Years
Areas needing improvement:
• Educator Preparation and Development
• Infrastructure for Technology
2011-2012The Last 3 Years
Areas needing improvement:
• Educator Preparation and Development
• Infrastructure for Technology
Our campus technology has improved significantly over the last three years due to:Active campus administrationQuality technology teamTeacher concern and participation
Areas that still need to be ddressed:Online learning for teachers and studentsRobust networking structureWireless capabilitiesEducator preparation in the area of preparing teachers how
to use technology to enhance student learning Improve the efficiency of our technical support by hiring
another campus technician
Final Thoughts for the Past 3 Years
