16
Under-Represented Minority Faculty Recruitment Policies in U.S. Medical Schools: An Environmental Scan Elorm F. Avakame James Guevara, MD, MPH

Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Under-Represented Minority Faculty Recruitment Policies in U.S. Medical Schools: An Environmental Scan Elorm F. Avakame James Guevara, MD, MPH

Page 2: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Project Overview Investigates associations between minority faculty development

programs in US medical schools and faculty diversity rates at those schools.

TIMELINE:

KEY TERMS:

Under-Represented in Medicine (URM) - Racial and ethnic populations underrepresented in the medical profession relative to their numbers in the general population

AAMC Faculty Roster System – Database of medical school faculty statistics maintained by Association of American Medical Colleges

Literature Review

Proposal Submission

Data Collection

Data Analysis

Manuscript Publication

YOU ARE HERE

Page 3: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Benefits of Faculty Diversity Diverse provider workforce ◦ Enhanced patient-provider relationship ◦ Underserved populations

Diverse researcher workforce ◦ Diverse perspective on popular areas of study ◦ New research interests

Diverse educator workforce ◦ Increasingly diverse medical student body

“The Challenging Task of Diversifying the Faculty in Academic Medicine” – L. Castillo-Page et al. “Under-Represented Minority Faculty Recruitment Programs in U.S. Medical Schools: An Environmental Scan” – J. Guevara

Sources:

Page 4: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Barriers to Faculty Diversity Feelings of social isolation

Demand to do “minority-related activities” ◦ E.g. mentoring, community involvement, committee

appointments, etc.

Lower career satisfaction ◦ Minorities less likely to be promoted than non-minorities ◦ Minorities transition out of academia sooner than other faculty

“The Challenging Task of Diversifying the Faculty in Academic Medicine” – L. Castillo-Page et al. Source:

Page 5: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Faculty Diversity Today Mean Faculty URM Proportion: 8.71% ◦ Range 2% - 35% (HBCUs – 70%)

African-American, Native American, Native Hawaiian – US Population: 13.7%

African American, Native American, Native Hawaiian – Faculty Population: 3.8%

Hispanic – US Population: 16.3% Hispanic – Faculty Population: 4.9%

Sources: United States Census 2010, AAMC Faculty Roster System

Page 6: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Faculty Diversity Today

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Hispanic Caucasian African-American Asian Native American Native Hawaiian

PE

RC

EN

TAG

ES

DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS

RELATIVE DIVERSITY PROPORTIONS (RACIAL/ETHNIC DIVERSITY - 2010)

% of USPopulation

% of MedicalSchool FacultyPopulation

Sources: United States Census 2010, AAMC Faculty Roster System

Page 7: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Faculty Diversity Today

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Male Female

PE

RC

EN

TAG

ES

GENDER

RELATIVE DIVERSITY PROPORTIONS (GENDER DIVERSITY – 2010)

% of US Population

% of Medical School FacultyPopulation

Sources: United States Census 2010, AAMC Faculty Roster System

Page 8: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Study Significance Prevalence of faculty diversity programs

unknown ◦ Findings will describe percentage of medical schools

with faculty diversity programs

Association between faculty diversity programs

and diversity outcomes unclear ◦ Findings will direct the “next steps” in faculty diversity

efforts

Page 9: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Primary Objective

“To identify and categorize programs targeting minority faculty development at U.S. medical schools using an environmental scan.”

Descriptive aim – no hypotheses

Four program domains: mentorship, career

development, social support, financial support

Page 10: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Secondary Objective “To determine associations between program domains and

minority faculty statistics at U.S. medical schools” HYPOTHESES:

A) Factors from each of the four domains will independently be positively associated with the proportion of URM faculty.

B) Factors in combination across domains will be more strongly associated with the proportion of URM faculty than factors in isolation.

C) These factors will be associated with the proportion of URM faculty separately among both newly recruited faculty and newly promoted faculty.

Page 11: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Methods – Phase III: Data Collection and Recording

Website searches

Subject recruitment

Key informant interviews

Interview transcriptions

Page 12: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Methods – Phase IV: Data Analysis Race

Sex

Faculty Rank ◦ Instructor, Asst Professor, Assoc

Professor, Professor

Track ◦ Tenure, Clinician-Educator,

Other

Department ◦ Clinical, Basic Science, Other

Degree ◦ MD, PhD, MD/PhD

Faculty Size (tertiles) ◦ Small, Medium, Large

School Rank (deciles) ◦ 1st … 10th

Region of Country ◦ West, South, Midwest,

Northeast

Funding Type ◦ Public, Private

Page 13: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Results

Page 14: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

My Roles Data Collection ◦ Subject Recruitment/Interviews ◦ Website searches ◦ Data recording

Primary Data Analysis ◦ Summary statistics United States Census 2010, AAMC Faculty Roster System

Page 15: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

What Have I Learned? Thinking cap required! ◦ Avoiding human error ◦ Interview techniques ◦ Solving problems

Data as a Second Language

Research Rocks!

Page 16: Assessing Faculty Diversity in US Medical Schools

Special Thanks To: Ms. Joanne Levy ◦ Program Director

Mrs. Elisabeth Madden ◦ Assistant Program Director

Dr. James Guevara ◦ Principal Investigator

Ms. Emem Adanga ◦ Project Supervisor

Source: US Census 2010