77
Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Product/Performance Dr. Carlo Magno Further Correspondence: [email protected] 1

Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

1

Assessing Knowledge, Process, Understanding, and Product/Performance

Dr. Carlo MagnoFurther Correspondence:

[email protected]

Page 2: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

2

Answer the following questions:

• What is assessment for you?• When do you conduct assessment?• What do you use to assess academic

skills of students?

Page 3: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

3

Advance Organizer

• Assessment competencies • The need for Standards• KPUP

Page 4: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Assessment Competencies for Teachers

• Constructed by the AFT, NCME, NEA:• Teachers should be skilled in:1. choosing assessment methods appropriate for

instructional decisions.2. Administering, scoring, and interpreting the results of

both externally produced and teacher produced assessment methods.

3. Using assessment results when making decisions about individual students, planning teaching, and developing curriculum and school improvement.

American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement and Evaluation, and National Education Association in the United States of America.

Page 5: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Assessment Competencies for Teachers

4. Developing valid pupil grading procedures that use pupil assessment.

5. Communicating assessment results to students, parents, other lay audiences, and other educators.

6. Recognizing unethical, illegal, and otherwise inappropriate assessment methods and uses of assessment information.

Page 6: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Why do we need standards?

• To make sure that everyone delivers quality work

• To produce quality students

• To deliver quality programs

• Basis on what to assess

6

Page 7: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

7

Mathematics Standards for Junior HS

• Algebra– explore the concepts involving a quadratic

function and its graph and solve problems involving quadratic functions and equations.

– solve equations involving rational expressions– explore relationships of quantities that involve

variation and solve problems involving direct, indirect and joint variation

Page 8: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

8

Mathematics Standards for Junior HS

– simplify expressions with rational exponents and solve problems involving them.

– perform fundamental operations on expressions involving radicals and solve problems involving expressions and equations with radicals.

Page 9: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

DepEd Taxonomy• content of the

curriculum, the facts and information that the student acquires

• cognitive operations that the student performs

• real-life application of understanding

• enduring big ideas, principles, and generalizations inherent to the discipline

Knowledge Process

Product/Performance

Understanding

Page 10: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

1. Students will describe quadratic function using graphs.

2. Solves quadratic equation by completing squares.3. Solves problems involving quadratic equation.4. Identify expressions with radicals5. Prove the theorem on angle similarity using SAS

similarity theorem.6. Draw two objects to differentiate triangle similarity

and triangle congruence.7. Prove the theorem on a 5X5 square.

Page 11: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

7. Determine the trigonometric ratio of special triangles

8. Creates a graph of an arithmetic sequence.9. Give examples of polynomial functions10.Draw a circle and illustrate 5 different chords.

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

Page 12: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

Page 13: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

Page 14: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

Page 15: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

Page 16: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

Page 17: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Determine whether: Knowledge, process, understanding, product/performance

Page 18: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

18

Knowledge

• Define• Describe• Identify• Label• Enumerate• Match

• Outline• select • State• Name• reproduce

Page 19: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Six Facets of Understanding Explain - provide thorough and justifiable accounts of

phenomena, facts, and data Interpret — tell meaningful stories, offer apt translations,

provide a revealing historical or personal dimension to ideas and events; make subjects personal or accessible through images, anecdotes, analogies, and models

Apply — effectively use and adapt what they know in diverse contexts

Have perspective — see and hear points of view through critical eyes and ears; see the big picture

Empathize — find value in what others might find odd, alien, or implausible; perceive sensitively on the basis of prior indirect experience

Have self-knowledge — perceive the personal style, prejudices, projections, and habits of mind that both shape and impede our own understanding; they are aware of what they do not understand and why understanding is so hard

Page 20: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Explain

Which of the following statements of the relationship between market price and normal price is true?

a. Over a short period of time, market price varies directly with changes in normal price.b. Over a long period of time, market price tends to equal normal price.c. Market price is usually lower than normal price.d. Over a long period of time, market price determines normal price.

Page 21: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Translation from symbolic form to another form, or vice versaWhich of the graphs below best represent the supply situation where a monopolist maintains a uniform price regardless of the amounts which people buy?

A B C D

S

Pric

e

Quantity

S

Pric

e

Quantity

S

SPric

e

Quantity

S S

Pric

e

Quantity

S

Interpret

Page 22: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

ApplyIn the following items (4-8) you are to judge the effects of a particular policy on the

distribution of income. In each case assume that there are no other changes in policy that would counteract the effect of the policy described in the item. Mark the item:

A. If the policy described would tend to reduce the existing degree of inequality in the distribution of income,

B. If the policy described would tend to increase the existing degree of inequality in the distribution of income, or

C. If the policy described would have no effect, or an indeterminate effect, on the distribution of income.

__ 4. Increasingly progressive income taxes.__ 5. Confiscation of rent on unimproved __ 6. Introduction of a national sales tax__ 7. Increasing the personal exemptions from income taxes__ 8. Distributing a subsidy to sharecroppers on southern farms

Page 23: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Have perspectiveAfter reading the passage answer the following questions…

1. Where was Carol walking?a. parkb. beachc. malld. city hall

2. How did she feel on this walk?a. enviedb. sadc. relaxedd. happy

Page 24: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Have perspective3. Carol envied the people around her because they

_____________________.a. were sad and lonelyb. love the city lifec. were laughing and jokingd. don’t like the city

Page 25: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Empathize

• Your new maid from the mountain destroyed your very expensive Narra door and she used it as firewood and cooked rice in your newly landscaped garden. How should you react?

• A…• B…• C…• D…

Page 26: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

26

• Ability to Recognize the Relevance of Information

Page 27: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

27

• Ability to Recognize Warranted and Unwarranted Generalizations

Page 28: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

28

• Ability to Recognize Inferences

Page 29: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

29

• Ability to Interpret Experimental Findings

Page 30: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

30

• Ability to Apply Principles

Page 31: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

31

• Ability to Recognize Assumptions

Page 32: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

32

Reading comprehension• Bem (1975) has argued that androgynous people are

“better off” than their sex-typed counterparts because they are not constrained by rigid sex-role concepts and are freer to respond to a wider variety of situations. Seeking to test this hypothesis, Bem exposed masculine, feminine, and androgynous men and women to situations that called for independence (a masculine attribute) or nurturance (a feminine attribute). The test for masculine independence assessed the subject’s willingness to resist social pressure by refusing to agree with peers who gave bogus judgments when rating cartoons for funniness (for example, several peers might say that a very funny cartoon was hilarious). Nurturance or feminine expressiveness, was measured by observing the behavior of the subject when left alone for ten minutes with a 5-month old baby. The result confirmed Bem’s hypothesis. Both the masculine sex-typed and the androgynous subjects were more independent (less conforming) on the ‘independence” test than feminine sex-typed individuals. Furthermore, both the feminine and the androgynous subjects were more “nurturant” than the masculine sex-typed individuals when interacting with the baby. Thus, the androgynous subjects were quite flexible, they performed as masculine subjects did on the “feminine” task.

35. What is the independent variable in the study? a. Situations calling for independence and

nurturanceb. Situation to make the sex type reactc. Situations to make the androgynous be

flexibled. Situations like sex type, androgynous and

sex role concepts 36. What are the levels of the IV? e. masculine attribute and feminine attributef. rating cartoons and taking care of a babyg. independence and nurturanceh. flexibility and rigidity

Page 33: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

33

Interpreting DiagramsInstruction. Study the following illustrations and answer the following

questions.

Figure 1

Pretest Posttest

101. Which group received the treatment? a. group A b. group Bb. c. none of the above 102. Why did group B remain stable across the experiment? a. there is an Extraneous Variableb. There was no treatmentc. ceiling effect occured 103. What is the problem during the pretest phase of the experiment? c. the two groups are nonequivalentd. the groups are competing with each otherc. the treatment took place immediately

Group B

Group A

Page 34: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

34

Process

• Cognitive operations• Cognitive and Metacognitive skills• Self-regulation• Learning strategies

Page 35: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Two components of Metacognition

• Knowledge of cognition is the reflective aspect of metacognition. It is the individuals’ awareness of their own knowledge, learning preferences, styles, strengths, and limitations, as well as their awareness of how to use this knowledge that can determine how well they can perform different tasks (de Carvalho, Magno, Lajom, Bunagan, & Regodon, 2005).

• Regulation of cognition on the other hand is the control aspect of learning. It is the procedural aspect of knowledge that allows effective linking of actions needed to complete a given task (Carvalho & Yuzawa, 2001).

Page 36: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Components of MetacognitonKnowledge of Cognition• (1) Declarative knowledge – knowledge

about one’s skills, intellectual resources, and abilities as a learner.

• (2) Procedural knowledge – knowledge about how to implement learning procedures (strategies)

• (3) Conditional knowledge – knowledge about when and why to use learning procedures.

Page 37: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Examples of knowledge of cognition in Mathematical Investigation

• Declarative Knowledge– Knowing what is needed to be solved– Understanding ones intellectual strengths and

weaknesses in solving math problems• Procedural knowledge

– Awareness of what strategies to use when solving math problems

– Have a specific purpose of each strategy to use• Conditional knowledge

– Solve better if the case is relevant

– Use different learning strategies depending on the type of problem

Page 38: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Components of MetacognitonRegulation of cognition1) Planning – planning, goal setting, and allocating

resources prior to learning.(2) Information Management Strategies – skills and

strategy sequences used on- line to process information more effectively (organizing, elaborating, summarizing, selective focusing).

(3) Monitoring – Assessing one’s learning or strategy use.

(4) Debugging Strategies – strategies used to correct comprehension and performance errors

(5) Evaluation of learning – analysis of performance and strategy effectiveness after learning episodes.

Page 39: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Examples of regulation of cognition• Planning

• Pacing oneself when solving in order to have enough time• Thinking about what really needs to be solved before beginning a

task• Information Management Strategies

• Focusing attention to important information• Slowing down when important information is encountered

• Monitoring• Considering alternatives to a problem before solving• Pause regularly to check for comprehension

• Debugging Strategies• Ask help form others when one doesn’t understand• Stop and go over of it is not clear

• Evaluation of learning• Recheck after solving• Find easier ways to do things

Page 40: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Shifts in assessment• Testing Alternative assessment

• Paper and pencil Performance assessment • Multiple choice Supply • Single correct answer Many correct answer • Summative Formative • Outcome only Process and Outcome • Skill focused Task-based • Isolated facts Application of knowledge • Decontextualized task Contextualized task

Page 41: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Alternative forms of assessment

• Performance based assessment• Authentic assessment• Portfolio assessment

Page 42: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Terms

• Authentic assessment

• Direct assessment• Alternative

assessment• Performance

testing• Performance

assessment• Changes are taking

place in assessment

Page 43: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Method

• Assessment should measure what is really important in the curriculum.

• Assessment should look more like instructional activities than like tests.

• Educational assessment should approximate the learning tasks of interest, so that, when students practice for the assessment, some useful learning takes place.

Page 44: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

What is Performance Assessment?

• Testing that requires a student to create an answer or a product that demonstrates his/her knowledge or skills (Rudner & Boston, 1991).

Page 45: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Features of performance assessment

• Intended to assess what it is that students know and can do with the emphasis on doing.

• Have a high degree of realism about them.• Involve: (a) activities for which there is no correct answer, (b)

assessing groups rather than individuals, (c) testing that would continue over an extended period of time, (d) self-evaluation of performances.

• Likely use open-ended tasks aimed at assessing higher level cognitive skills.

Page 46: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 47: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 48: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Push on performance assessment

• Bring testing methods more in line with instruction.

• Assessment should approximate closely what it is students should know and be able to do.

Page 49: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Emphasis of performance assessment

• Should assess higher level cognitive skills rather than narrow and lower level discreet skills.

• Direct measures of skills of interest.

Page 50: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Characteristics of performance-based assessment

• Students perform, create, construct, produce, or do something.• Deep understanding and/or reasoning skills are needed and

assessed.• Involves sustained work, often days and weeks.• Calls on students to explain, justify, and defend.• Performance is directly observable.• Involves engaging in ideas of importance and substance.• Relies on trained assessor’s judgments for scoring• Multiple criteria and standards are prespecified and public• There is no single correct answer.• If authentic, the performance is grounded in real world contexts

and constraints.

Page 51: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Variation of authenticityRelatively authentic Somewhat authentic Authentic

Indicate which parts of a garden design are accurate

Design a garden Create a garden

Write a paper on zoning Write a proposal to change fictitious zoning laws

Write a proposal to present to city council to change zoning laws

Explain what would you teach to students learning basketball

Show how to perform basketball skills in practice

Play a basketball game.

Page 52: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Constructing Performance Based tasks

1. Identify the performance task in which students will be engaged

2. Develop descriptions of the task and the context in which the performance is to be conducted.

3. Write the specific question, prompt, or problem that the student will receive.

• Structure: Individual or group?• Content: Specific or integrated?• Complexity: Restricted or extended?

Page 53: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Complexity of task

• Restricted-type task– Narrowly defined and require brief responses– Task is structured and specific– Ex:

• Construct a bar graph from data provided• Demonstrate a shorter conversation in French about what is on a menu• Read an article from the newspaper and answer questions• Flip a coin ten times. Predict what the next ten flips of the coin will be,

and explain why.• Listen to the evening news on television and explain if you believe the

stories are biased.• Construct a circle, square, and triangle from provided materials that

have the same circumference.

Page 54: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

• Extended-type task– Complex, elaborate, and time-consuming.– Often include collaborative work with small group of students.– Requires the use of a variety of information– Examples:

• Design a playhouse and estimate cost of materials and labor• Plan a trip to another country: Include the budget and itinerary, and

justify why you want to visit certain places• Conduct a historical reenactment (e. g. impeachment trial of ERAP)• Diagnose and repair a car problem• Design an advertising campaign for a new or existing product

Page 55: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Identifying Performance Task Description

• Prepare a task description• Listing of specifications to ensure that essential if criteria are

met• Includes the ff.:

– Content and skill targets to be assessed– Description of student activities

• Group or individual• Help allowed

– Resources needed– Teacher role– Administrative process– Scoring procedures

Page 56: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Performance-based Task Question Prompt

• Task prompts and questions will be based on the task descriptions.

• Clearly identifies the outcomes, outlines what the students are encourage dot do, explains criteria for judgment.

Page 57: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Example of a task Prompt:

Page 58: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 59: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 60: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 61: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 62: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 63: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product
Page 64: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Performance Criteria

• What you look for in student responses to evaluate their progress toward meeting the learning target.

• Dimensions of traits in performance that are used to illustrate understanding, reasoning, and proficiency.

• Start with identifying the most important dimensions of the performance

• What distinguishes an adequate to an inadequate demonstration of the target?

Page 65: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Example of Criteria

• Learning target: – Students will be able to write a persuasive paper to

encourage the reader to accept a specific course of action or point of view.

• Criteria:– Appropriateness of language for the audience– Plausibility and relevance of supporting arguments.– Level of detail presented– Evidence of creative, innovative thinking– Clarity of expression – Organization of ideas

Page 66: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Rating Scales

• Indicate the degree to which a particular dimension is present.

• Three kinds: Numerical, qualitative, combined qualitative/quantitative

Page 67: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

• Numerical Scale– Numbers of a continuum to indicate different level

of proficiency in terms of frequency or quality

Example:No Understanding 1 2 3 4 5 Complete

understandingNo organization 1 2 3 4 5 Clear organizationEmergent reader 1 2 3 4 5 Fluent reader

Page 68: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

• Qualitative scale– Uses verbal descriptions to indicate student

performance.– Provides a way to check the whether each

dimension was evidenced.• Type A: Indicate different gradations of the dimension• Type B: Checklist

Page 69: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

• Example of Type A:– Minimal, partial, complete– Never, seldom, occasionally, frequently, always– Consistent, sporadically, rarely– None, some, complete– Novice, intermediate, advance, superior– Inadequate, needs improvement, good excellent– Excellent, proficient, needs improvement– Absent, developing, adequate, fully developed– Limited, partial, thorough– Emerging, developing, achieving– Not there yet, shows growth, proficient– Excellent, good, fair, poor

Page 70: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

• Example of Type A: Checklist

Page 71: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

• Holistic scale– The category of the scale contains several criteria, yielding a single

score that gives an overall impression or rating

Examplelevel 4: Sophisticated understanding of text indicated with constructed meaninglevel 3: Solid understanding of text indicated with some constructed meaninglevel 2: Partial understanding of text indicated with tenuous constructed meaninglevel 1: superficial understanding of text with little or no constructed meaning

Page 72: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Example holistic scale

Page 73: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

• Analytic Scale– One in which each criterion receives a separate

score.

ExampleCriteria Outstanding

5 4Competent 3

Marginal2 1

Creative ideas

Logical organization

Relevance of detail

Variety in words and sentencesVivid images

Page 74: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Rubrics• When scoring criteria are combined with a

rating scale, a complete scoring guideline is produced or rubric.

• A scoring guide that uses criteria to differentiate between levels of student proficiency.

Page 75: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Example of a rubric

Page 76: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Guidelines in creating a rubric

1. Be sure the criteria focus on important aspects of the performance

2. Match the type of rating with the purpose of the assessment

3. The descriptions of the criteria should be directly observable

4. The criteria should be written so that students, parents, and others understand them.

5. The characteristics and traits used in the scale should be clearly and specifically defined.

6. Take appropriate steps to minimize scoring frame

Page 77: Assessment Knowledge, Process, Understanding, Process/Product

Workshop

• Create a performance based task.• Indicate the following:– Nature of the final product– What students are suppose to do– Criteria for the marking