24
Systematics in ecology ALEX FILAZZOLA CRITICAL THINKING LAB 2

BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Systematics in ecologyALEX FILAZZOLACRITICAL THINKING LAB 2

Page 2: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 3: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Different types of literature Primary sources – original materials, often empirical testing or experiments.

Examples: - Journal articles - Experimental data - Communications

Page 4: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Different types of literature Secondary sources – interpretations or summarization of primary sources

Examples: - Reviews - Meta-analyses - Commentaries

Page 5: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Different types of literature Tertiary sources – A distillation and collection of primary and secondary sources

Examples: - Encyclopedias - Textbooks - Bibliographies

Page 6: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Different types of literature Grey literature – is information or researched produced by an organization or government.

Examples: - Government documents - Newsletters - Technical reports

Page 7: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Synthesis tools Textbook examples Narrative reviews

Vote counting Combining probabilities

Systematic reviews Meta-analysis

Page 8: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

hypothesis orproblem

predictions orqueries

Page 9: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

i. summarize knowledge

ii. meta-analysis

Page 10: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Narratives - Reviews written about a subject that are not quantitative

- Relatively easy to write

- Biased towards authors of the article

- Typically written by experts on the subject

Page 11: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

- Reviews that are based from a systematic search through the literature of a topic

- More difficult to write, requires reading many articles to make conclusions

- Less biased towards authors, but biased towards the state of the literature

- Written by any researcher

Systematic reviews

Page 12: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 13: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 14: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 15: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

- Reviews that are based from statistics conducted on multiple studies

- Difficult because it requires specific data from many articles.

- Generally unbiased, comparing effect sizes rather than studies

- Written by any researcher

Meta-analysis

Page 16: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 17: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 18: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 19: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 20: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 21: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 22: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology
Page 23: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Choosing search terms - Wild cards (*) to capture different spellings. - Do not truncate - Avoid ambiguity - Common names and latin names - define inclusion material

Page 24: BIOL2050 - systematics in ecology

Refinement techniques - Refine to English language

- Refine to empirical papers and exclude reviews for systematic reviews/meta-analyses

- Refine to countries when targeting a geographic area

- Refine to year when targeting a time frame.