33
California eLearning Census Between the Tipping Point and Critical Mass http://clrn.org/census/

Census presentation 2013

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Census presentation 2013

California eLearning Census

Between the Tipping Point and Critical Mass

http://clrn.org/census/

Page 2: Census presentation 2013

2013 Responses

March 1 – May 1

516 Responses 29% of 1777

144 Direct-Funded Charters

372 Districts

263 K-12/9-12 Districts/charters

253 K-5/K-8 Districts/charters

Page 3: Census presentation 2013

Response Breakdown

2012

K-5/K-8

K-12/9-12

2013

56% 51%

Page 4: Census presentation 2013

Who is eLearning?

YesNo

46%

516 districts & charters

Page 5: Census presentation 2013

eLearning by Grade Span

K-5/K-8 K-12/9-120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

20122013

19%

73%

Page 6: Census presentation 2013

eLearning: Charters vs. Districts

Charter

Districts

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

44%

53%

Page 7: Census presentation 2013

Who wants to eLearn?

Yes

No N=273

26%

Page 8: Census presentation 2013

Who wants, by grade span

K-5/K-8

Yes

No20%

K-12/9-12

44%

Page 9: Census presentation 2013

Who Wants, by Type

Charters

Districts

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

24%

27%

Page 10: Census presentation 2013

eLearning by Grade2013

51%

30%

81%

28%

49%

78%

Page 11: Census presentation 2013

Starting Small

< 20 Students

2012 20130

5

10

15

20

25

30

Bottom 50

2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

700800

900

1000

24%

13%542

887

Page 12: Census presentation 2013

Full and Part-time Online Learning Populations

Virtual Blended0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

20122013

86.3K

19.8K24.4K

100.9K

17% Increase23%

Increase

Page 13: Census presentation 2013

Average eLearning Population

Summer Virtual Average Blended Average0

100

200

300

400

500

600

139

2012

2013

80

56

125 132

453490

98

Page 14: Census presentation 2013

Blended and Virtual Medians

Blended Median Virtual Median0

20

40

60

80

100

120

702012

2013

80

56

100

Medians Increase by 25%

Page 15: Census presentation 2013

Summer 2011 Breakdown

90 districts/charters utilized online learning during summer

23,087 students N: 90 (78% districts, 22% charters)

Page 16: Census presentation 2013

Summer 2012 Breakdown

105 districts/charters utilized online learning during summer

23,379 students N: 105(78% districts, 22% charters) (same as 2011)

Page 17: Census presentation 2013

Blended Model Breakdown2012

Flex

Rotation

Enriched-Virtual

Self-Blend

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

60%

17%

36%

29%

31% of districts & charters

use more than one model

Page 18: Census presentation 2013

Blended Model Breakdown: 2013

Flex

Rotation

Enriched-Virtual

Self-Blend

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

40%

25%

33%

47%

34% of districts & charters

use more than one model

Page 19: Census presentation 2013

2013: K-5/K-8 Blended Model Breakdown

Self-Blend

Enriched-Virtual

Rotation

Flex

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

N=40

80%15% of K-5/K-8 districts & charters use more than one model

Page 20: Census presentation 2013

2012: K-12/9-12 Blended Model Breakdown

Self-Blend

Enriched Virtual

Rotation

Flex

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

N=199

Page 21: Census presentation 2013

2013: K-12/9-12 Blended Model Breakdown

Self-Blend

Enriched Virtual

Rotation

Flex

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

N=163

48%

39%

37%

28%

38% of districts & charters use more than one model

Page 22: Census presentation 2013

Are Charters More Disruptive?

Enriched Vir-tual

Flex A La Carte Rotation0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

CharterDistrict

Page 23: Census presentation 2013

Course Publisher Distribution2012

23% of districts & charters use more than one provider

Page 24: Census presentation 2013

Course Publisher Distribution2013

University of Nebraska, LincolnConnections Learning

National University Virtual HighVoyager Learning

Accelerate EducationClass.com

A+ LearningCurrium

Middlebury Interactive LanguagesFlorida Virtual SchoolAdvanced Academics

AccellusBYU Independent Study

Compass LearningEducation 2020District CreatedPlato Learning

Pearson Digital LearningK12.com

ALEKSOdysseyware

Cyber HighAventa (K12, Inc)

Apex Learning

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

46% of districts & charters use more than one provider

Page 25: Census presentation 2013

2013: Self-Built Courses and OER

Thinkfinity

OER Commons

NROC

MIT Open Courseware

Kahn Academy

iTunes University

Hippocampus

CLRN

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

87%

Page 26: Census presentation 2013

What factors did you consider when selecting courseware?

None

Selected CLRN Certified courses.

Colleague recommendation

Vendor demonstration

Data supplied by provider

Examined course outlines

U.C. A-G list

Compared to content standards

Price

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

77%

60%

60%

55%

42%

42%

6%

Page 27: Census presentation 2013

District Actions Taken Before Purchasing Courses

None of the above

Have your students sample the course?

Ask other districts who use the course about their experience?

Have your teachers sample the course?

Have the provider demonstrate the course to you?

Ask for a demo account?

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

77%

74%

72%

55%

34%

9%

Page 28: Census presentation 2013

How many publishers/providers did you investigate?

1

2

3

4 or more

52%24%

15%

9%

Page 29: Census presentation 2013

How many courses from each publisher/provider did you investigate?

0 1

2 3

4 or more

40%

17%

28%

8%8%

Page 30: Census presentation 2013

Where Do Teachers Come From?

District Instruc-torsProvider Instructors

Both

75%14%

11%

Page 31: Census presentation 2013

Do Online Instructors Receive OL/BL Professional Development?

No

Yes

22%

Page 32: Census presentation 2013

Learning Management Systems

SakaiEdu 2.0

Open ClassAngel

CourseSitesCanvas

Desire2LearnSchoology

Custom BuiltBrain Honey

CaliQityBlackboard

HaikuMoodle

Edmodo

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

39%24%

Page 33: Census presentation 2013

Between the Tipping Point and Critical Mass