View
501
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
TERN Symposium 2011
Citation preview
1
The Atlas of Australian Birds
From atlassing to monitoring
2
Overview
• A very brief history of Atlas• Project objectives• Data structure• Challenges• Regional scale reporting• Resourcing
3
The Atlas – a one minute history
• First Atlas 1977-1981: project initiated to establish species distributions
• Second atlas 1998-2002: point locations defined
• Continuous data flow since 1998 –currently stable at over 2,000 surveys/month
4
Data volume:sightings per year (total c. 8M)
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Year
No. o
f Sig
htin
gs
5
Data volume:surveys per year (total c. 0.5M)
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Year
No. o
f Sur
veys
6
Participation:number of active observers (total ≥ 5556)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Year
No
of O
bser
vers
7
Project Objectives• Original aim was to map distribution• Some current aims:
> track (and report on) population changes
: in abundance
: in distribution
> engage communities in biodiversity/monitoring
8
Other potential objectives
• Integrate with national monitoring • Integrate with international reporting
objectives• Contribute to ‘indicators’ approaches
9
Data collection• Area searches: within 500m or 5km
radius, ≥ 20 min• Incidental search: usually a one-off
sighting• 2ha/20min search • Fixed route surveys: fixed site/method• Group atlassing sites: fixed site/method
10
Data structure
• Increasing proportion of fixed-site, fixed effort and count data, and repeat visits
• Potentially large amount of latent structure (repeated area searches which are Fixed Route Surveys)
11
Regional ReportingACRIS Rangelands
• Composite indices (Ross Cunningham – A.N.U.);
• Change in reporting rates based on presence-absence data
• High level of heterogeneity of trend across IBRAs
• Assessed trends for 60 most common species in 10 IBRAs
12
13
14
15
16
17
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 post2006
Year
No
. of s
pec
ies
Slight peak
Stong peak
Strong trough
Slight trough
18
Key Challenge: engagement Atlassers are:
• Highly skilled• Patchily distributed (heavily
concentrated in the coastal population centres)
• Old!
19
Key Challenge: promote fixed-site monitoring
• Defined sites• Repeat visits• Controlled sampling effort and method• Same observer per site• Continuity - Australian Bird Count 1986-
96
20
Resources
21
Where do birds fit inNational Accounts?
As a surrogate for assessing the condition of native vegetation – Wentworth Group
• Well distributed across habitats• Play a variety of ecological roles• Use a wide variety of resources• Cheap to count• Manageable number of species• Existing datasets
22
How are we incorporating these data?
Partnership with Atlas of Living Australia
• Birds Australia database remains central repository
• All data made freely available to ALA• ALA assisting BA in tools for data acquisition,
capture, management - web-based portals• BA manages data acquisition, quality, licence
restrictions
23
Potential role in research? Yes – but only if you’re asking the right
questions
Can TERN support it better?
Yes – but don’t give us a new survey method
24
Thanks
www.birdsaustralia.com.au