27
The Courts From Magistrates Court to Supreme Court

Courts system

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Courts system

The CourtsFrom Magistrates Court to Supreme Court

Page 2: Courts system

Overview

The common law system is based on precedent - cases set law for future cases.

Precedents from the higher courts are stronger than precedents from lower courts.

But how does the court system work?

What is the appeals process?

Page 3: Courts system

Objectives

By the end of the session, all learners will:

1) Be able to identify the key features of the courts system.

Page 4: Courts system

Hierarchy

Supreme Court

Supreme Court

Court of Appeal

Court of Appeal

High CourtHigh CourtCrown Court

Crown Court

Magistrates Court

Magistrates Court

At first instance, trials are always heard at either the Magistrates Court

or Crown Court. It depends on the nature of the offence.....

Page 5: Courts system

Categories of Criminal Offences

Summary: Least serious crimes (speeding etc)

Triable either-way: Slightly more serious than summary (having a knife in a public place etc).

Indictable: The most serious offences (murder etc).

Page 6: Courts system

Match the Offence to the Court

Magistrates Court

Crown Court

Summary Offences

Triable either way

Indictable Offences

Page 7: Courts system

Crown Court vs Magistrates Court - What's the Difference?

Magistrates Court

•Mostly non-lawyers, assisted by a legal clerk.

•Can fine up to £5,000

•Can imprison for up to six months.

Crown Court

•Overseen by a qualified judge.

•Fines are unlimited (subject to statutory restrictions).

•Can imprison for anything up to life (subject to statutory restrictions).

Page 8: Courts system

Triable Either Way - Where Will the Trial be Held?

Plea before venue: If D pleads guilty, he may be sentenced by the Magistrates. If they think their powers are insufficient, they will send the case to the Crown Court for sentencing.

Page 9: Courts system

Triable Either Way - Where Will the Trial be Held?

If D pleads not guilty, a mode of trial procedure takes place.

Magistrates will consider if the case is suitable to be heard by them. If not, they will send it to the Crown Court.

D then gets to choose which court he wants: Magistrates or Crown.

Page 10: Courts system

Triable Either Way - Where Will the Trial be Held?

How does D plead?

How does D plead?

Sentencing carried out at

Magistrates Court unless

powers not sufficient.

Sentencing carried out at

Magistrates Court unless

powers not sufficient.

Guilty

Is the case suitable to beheard at the Magistrates

Court?

Is the case suitable to beheard at the Magistrates

Court?

Not guilty

Case sent to the Crown Court

Case sent to the Crown Court

No

Does D want to have his trial

at the Magistrates Court?

Does D want to have his trial

at the Magistrates Court?

Case sent to the Crown Court

Case sent to the Crown Court

No

Yes

Case heard by the Magistrates CourtCase heard by the Magistrates Court

Yes

Page 11: Courts system

Appeals - Magistrates Court

Pleaded guilty: Right to appeal sentence to the Crown Court.

Pleaded not guilty: Right to appeal both conviction and sentence to Crown Court.

Crown Court can: quash conviction or uphold it; reduce sentence (but not increase).

21 day time limit.

Page 12: Courts system

Appeals - Magistrates Court

If D or P allege that the Magistrates Court made an error of law, they can appeal to the High Court.

High Court examines the Magistrates' reasoning, but does not hold a fresh trial.

Page 13: Courts system

Appeals - Magistrates Court

Error of fact: Appealed to the Crown Court and a fresh trial heard.

Error of law: Appealed to the High Court and the reasoning examined. No fresh trial.

Page 15: Courts system

Crown Court - Procedure

1. Plea and Case Management Hearing: D pleads guilty or not guilty. If he pleads guilty, he is sentenced; if he pleads not guilty, a trial is arranged.

2. Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996: D and P must swap all their evidence and arguments. P must also disclose any documents that might undermine their case.

Page 16: Courts system

Appeals - Crown Court

Under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995, the Court of Appeal will give permission to appeal if the conviction is unsafe.

About 30% of cases are granted permission to appeal.

Must be requested within 28 days.

Page 17: Courts system

Appeals to the Supreme Court

P or D may appeal to the Supreme Court.

They must obtain permission, and will only receive it of the case concerns a point of law of public importance.

Page 18: Courts system

Criminal Cases Review Commission

Set up under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995

Investigate cases where there might have been a miscarriage of justice.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUJHfEb9v88

Page 19: Courts system

Youth Court

Offenders aged 10-17 are dealt with by this court: a branch of the Magistrates Court.

Exceptionally, young offenders can be tried in the Crown Court for very serious offences.

Trial is held in private.

Members of the press may attend but cannot report the child's name.

Page 20: Courts system

Precedent

Statements of law made by a higher court must be followed by lower courts.

If a case involving the same bit of law comes before the Court of Appeal, it must follow the case decided by the Supreme Court

Page 21: Courts system

Precedent

How do we find precedents?

READ CASE LAW: This is why it is a good idea to mention cases in problem questions - they are statements of law.

Page 22: Courts system

Ratio Decidendi

When a judge decides a case, he gives his reasons in a law report.

Those reasons and explanations are called ratio decidendi and they set binding precedents.

The judge might say other things unrelated to the case (e.g. speculate how the case would have been decided if the facts were different). This is called obiter dicta and only sets persuasive precedent.

Page 23: Courts system

Do Courts Bind Themselves

Traditionally, all courts bound themselves.

If the Supreme Court says the law is X, it cannot change the law at a later date. Cannot modernise it.

Ever since the Practice Statement 1966, the Supreme Court has been able to overrule its previous decisions.

Page 24: Courts system

Practice Statement 1966

Knuller v DPP (1973):

Lord Reid: Although we have permission to overrule older decisions, we should only do so if there is some very good reason for doing so. It is important to maintain certainty in the law.

Page 25: Courts system

Practice Statement 1966

Pepper v Hart (1993)

House of Lords overruled its previous decision that Hansard cannot be used to aid statutory interpretation.

V

Page 26: Courts system

Practice Statement 1966

Remember this?

Page 27: Courts system

Precedent - Overview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bu36FGG4dv8