Upload
noor-syamila
View
62
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Introduction
0 This lecture will consist of the following:
1. Curriculum Evaluation: Types, Purposes, Procedures
2. CIPP Model
Definition of Curriculum Evaluation
0 Making judgments about the desirability of certain
changes in students + using info to change teaching
and the curriculum
Definition
Various definitions:
1. Tyler (1950): the process of determining to what extend
educational objectives are being attained
2. Borg & Gall (1983): the process of making judgment abt
the merit, value or worth of educational prog, projects,
materials and techniques
Definition
3. Smith & Glass (1987): the process of establishing value
judgments based on evidence abt a program / product
4. Stufflebeam et al. (1971): .. The process of delineating,
obtaining & providing useful info for judging decision
alternatives
Definition
0 Provus (1971): the comparison of performance to
some standards to determine whether discrepancies
existed
Types of Evaluation
0 Scriven (1967)
1) Formative evaluation
0 on-going program
0 program improvement
0 provide data abt educational program
to assist developer in improving the program
Types of Evaluation
2) Summative evaluation
0 done at the completion of a program
0 concerned with overall effectiveness of the
program
0 Provide data to determine the worth of the
program
Evaluation in curriculum development
0 Evaluation – part of the curriculum development
process
0 Enables curriculum makers reviewing and
modifying – to cater the current and future needs
Evaluation in curriculum development
0 Curriculum shd be continuously reviewed & reviewed
0 WHY??
0 maintaining and sustaining: quality of the program relevance in meeting adequacy the ever changing quantity needs
Evaluation in curriculum development
0 QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ASKED:
1) Are the program (curriculum) meeting existing or
expected needs?
2) Does the program contain extraneous and outdated
materials?
3) Are the students able to perform adequately once they
finish their study?
Evaluation in curriculum development
0 Wentling (1980): EVALUATION MUST DO MORE
THAN :
0 just analyse the extend to which a program had
adhered to an original plan
0 OR attained its primary goals and objectives
Evaluation in curriculum development
0 So, based on Wentling’s (1980) suggestion..
0 Curriculum evaluation needs to go beyond the
assessment of student behaviour
0 It should include the overall effect on students,
teachers and society
Evaluation in curriculum development
0 The task of evaluating the curriculum involves a COMPLEX PROCESS
0 A comprehensive evaluation framework or model is necessary to achieve a systematic, effective and efficient evaluation
CIPP Model For Evaluation
0 Introduced by Daniel Stufflebeam in 1966.
0 A comprehensive framework for guiding formative and summative evaluation of Programs (Curriculum, course design, etc.)
Projects
Personnel
Products
Institutions
Systems
CIPP Model For Evaluation
0The model has been widely applied by:
Government officials
Foundation officers
Program and project staffs
International assistance personnel
School administrators
Evaluators, etc.
Model (framework) for Curriculum Evaluation
0 CIPP model (Finch & Bjorquist, 1977)
CONTEXT EVALUATION
INPUT EVALUATION
PROCESS EVALUATION
PRODUCT EVALUATION
CURRICULUM INITIATION AND STRUCTURING
CURRICULUM OPERATION
Context Evaluation
0 Involves analysis of goals and needs in a specific education setting
0 Needs a discrepancy between an existing condition and desired condition
0 Evaluation of context includes: Environment Students Background School climate Goals and objectives of offering the program, etc.
Input Evaluation
0 Concerns judgment about resources and strategies needed to accomplish program goals and objectives
0 This includes the quality of: The curriculum and syllabus
Students
Teachers
Staffs
Facilities and infrastructures, etc.
Process Evaluation 0 Involves the collection of data once the program
has been designed and put into operation.
0Data which is collected over a period of time is useful in detecting strengths and weaknesses of the program.
0Process including: Teachers’ methods
The facilities used
The students performance, etc.
Product Evaluation
0 To determine the extent to which the goals of the program have been achieved.
0 Data collected can be used to make decisions about the program and making modifications for improvement.
0 This can be done through feedback from former students or graduates, employers and the society.
0 Concerns accountability i.e. the number of quality of the students and graduates produced.