28
Eldar Shafir Princeton University Sendhil Mullainathan Harvard University Christopher Bryan Crystal Hall Anandi Mani Anuj Shah On the Psychology of Scarcity

Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Eldar Shafir Princeton University

Sendhil Mullainathan Harvard University

Christopher Bryan Crystal Hall Anandi Mani Anuj Shah

On the Psychology of Scarcity

Page 2: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Two Dominant Views of Behavior under Poverty Rational Choice view

–  Consistency, Willpower, Well-defined preferences,.. –  Behavior: calculated adaptation to prevailing circumstances

Pathology view –  Psychological pathologies specific to the poor –  Impatient, no planning, confused –  Behaviors endemic to “culture of poverty”

An alternative:

Us! Neither rational nor pathological; just plain human…

Page 3: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Conditions of scarcity (in money, time…) produce their own psychology. This psychology, in contexts of scarcity, produces characteristic behaviors.

The psychology of scarcity…

Page 4: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

The Packing Problem: A Suitcase metaphor

Larger suitcase: - pack everything important w. room to spare - easy to leave slack, in case something comes up

Smaller suitcase: - pack the very essentials - need to choose among important items that don’t fit - hard to maintain any slack

•  Slack makes it easier to pack; Complexity higher when suitcase tight –  Slack reduces cognitive cost: requires less focus, less vigilance

•  Bigger suitcase means slack is “cheaper” –  What you give up to maintain slack is (marginally) cheaper

Page 5: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Tradeoffs: % who think about what they would not buy instead…

(India)

(US)

Page 6: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Taxi fare when you first get in?… (South Station)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Low SES High SES

Page 7: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Tradeoffs: If I buy this, what do If I do this, what do I not buy instead? I not do instead?

Indulgences: Given what you owe, what are you doing spending?!

Given what you owe, what are you doing here schmoozing?!..

Basic goods turn into “luxuries”

Basic activities turn into “luxuries”

Temptations:

Poor in Money or Time… an empathy bridge

More consequential: When there’s lack of slack, bad tradeoffs, giving into temptation / indulging - all more consequential!...

Page 8: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Psychology of Scarcity

•  Persistent tradeoff thinking •  More complicated / demanding packing… •  Greater vigilance (attentiveness, knowledge...) •  Focus (often highly effective...)

è •  Tunneling

•  Horizon shortening (“myopia..”)

•  Borrowing •  Insensitivity to horizon & its costs…

•  Distraction •  Depletion, Error…

Page 9: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

20 rounds “Rich”: 50 sec / rnd (1000 sec total) “Poor”:15 sec / rnd (300 sec total)

No borrowing vs. High Interest Borrowing

Page 10: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Poor Rich

No Borrow

Borrow1:2

Rounds Completed

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Poor Rich

No Borrow

Borrow1:2

P < .001!

Points Earned

P < .001

Page 11: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

•  Debt  Traps  

•  Smoothing  consump4on  

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Round

Low Slack

High Slack

-0.008

-0.006

-0.004

-0.002

0

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

low slack high slack

No Borrow

Borrow1:2

Page 12: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Overall  performance  (poor  vs  rich)  

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Poor Rich

No Borrow

Borrow 1:2

N = 68

Page 13: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Momentary  Focus  (poor  vs  rich)  

7

7.3

7.6

7.9

8.2

8.5

First Shot

Second Shot

ln(t

ime

)

Poor

Rich

N = 68

Page 14: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Scarcity is distracting..

(Calorie)  Scarcity  Hypothesis:    Temp4ng  foods  monopolize  the  aCen4on  of  dieters  (more  than  of  non-­‐dieters…)  

   

   

Page 15: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty
Page 16: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Search  4mes  –  for  neutral  targets  -­‐-­‐  by  condi4on  and  group  

!"#$

!"%$

!"!$

!"&$

&$

&"'$

&"($

)*+,-./0/12$ 3./0/12$

!"#$%&'(

)*"&+,-

$),'&./$0+,)$*"

&$(,

1%&'2$%'&#,%$3

"&-)$

4**-$5*+-.6*+$

7*+01*8$5*+-.6*+$

*

(3 practice trials) Interaction: Significant!

Page 17: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Financial challenges…

Imagine that your car...requires a..[ hard: $1,500; easy: $150] service… How would you go about making this decision?...

In a NJ mall: Participants think about financial challenges, and complete cognitive tasks…

Page 18: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

press the same side as the heart press the opposite side as the flower

Raven's Progressive Matrices

“Driving test”… “Intelligence test”…

“Measures high-level observation skills, clear thinking ability, and intellectual capacity.”

Measures cognitive control & executive function…

Cognitive control task

Page 19: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

0  

0.1  

0.2  

0.3  

0.4  

0.5  

0.6  

Rich   Poor  

Easy  (cheap)  

Hard  (Expensive)  

Raven’s Matrices

!"#$

!"%$

!"&$

!"'$

!"($

!")$

!"*$

!"+$

,$

-./0$ 1223$

4567$8/095:;$

<53=$84>:9?6.@9;$

Cognitive Control

Performance in financial challenge

Page 20: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Sugar cane farmers in India…

Significantly greater # of errors pre-harvest compared to post-harvest…

(Also heart rate, blood pressure, etc.)

Page 21: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

   press  the  same  side  as  the  heart      press  the  opposite  side  as  the  flower  

Raven's Progressive Matrices Cognitive control task

Affirmation at a Soup Kitchen

Page 22: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Results

Page 23: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Affirmation in the context of welfare benefits programs (EITC and local VITA sites) …

Stopped to consider: 44% 58% (ns)

Of those, took the information: 36% 79% p=.03

(Total take up:) 16% 46% p<.01

Neutral Affirmation Condition:

Page 24: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Irony of Poverty

•  Poor must make higher quality decisions –  Packing problems are harder under scarcity –  Many more temptations under scarcity –  Can’t afford mistakes under scarcity

•  Poor are in worse position to make high quality decisions –  Distracted by other stressors/decisions/conditions –  Depleted by challenges/temptations/past failures –  Hampered by context/culture/stereotype –  Unappreciated! (Both they and their packing problems...)

Page 25: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Problem Bottleneck Nudges

Inventions

Low Income Workers Less Productive High Turnover

Psychic Tax of Poverty

Financial Stabilizer

Page 26: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Provide  customer  service  

ideas42  is  pilo3ng  a  package  of  financial  services  designed  to  simplify  and  stabilize  finances  for  low  income  employees  

Provide  emergency  buffer    

•  Low-­‐cost  credit  access  •  Emergency  savings  

Give  3mely  feedback  &  automate  messaging  

 •  Reminders  about  important  

financial  deadlines  •  Progress  tracking  for  financial  

goals  and  commitments  

Pilot design

26

Create  budget  

Direct  deposit  into  3  dedicated  accounts:  

           1)  Bill  payment            2)  Discre4onary  spending            3)  Emergency  savings  

Set up session with financial representative

1

Automate  payments      

•  Bill  payment  •  Emergency  savings  

Ongoing interaction

with employee

2

Page 27: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty

Thank  you!  

Page 28: Decision-Making Under Conditions of Poverty