23
Prof. Dr. UlfDaniel Ehlers Duale Hochschule BadenWür9emberg European Founda?on for Quality in ELearning Determining Quality of OER in Open Educa7on State of the Art Review

Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Citation preview

Page 1: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Prof.  Dr.  Ulf-­‐Daniel  Ehlers  Duale  Hochschule  Baden-­‐Wür9emberg  

European  Founda?on  for  Quality  in  E-­‐Learning  

Determining  Quality  of  OER  in  Open  Educa7on    State  of  the  Art  Review  

Page 2: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Some  picks  from  current  cha2er...  

The  Subs6tu6on  Model  •  Open  Educa6on  will  subs6tute  tradi6onal  higher  educa6on    

The  Enrichment  Model  •  Open  Educa6on  is  used  to  enrich  tradi6onal  higher  educa6on  

The  Lifelong  Learning  Model  •  Open  Educa6on  will  be  used  to  offer  lifelong  learning  opportuni6es  

Page 3: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Anno  1088  

h2p://isdsbologna2013.org/blog/loca6on/bologna/#!pre2yPhoto-­‐205/0/  

Exclusively  for  the  chosen  few...  

Page 4: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Anno  1965  

h2p://www.rd.ruhr-­‐uni-­‐bochum.de/imperia/md/images/rd/plasma/news/luPbild_rub_s__dwest.jpg  

Industrialisa7on,  Massifica7on,    Standardisa7on  

Page 5: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

 Anno  2004  

h2p://web.mit.edu/jsaa/www/photos/stata.jpg  

Postmodern,  Individualised,    Disaggregated  

Page 6: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

First  conclusion:  Where  does  that  leave  us?  

•  The  tradi6onal  model:  Exclusively  for  few  chosen.  

•  The  modern  (massifica6on)  model:  Standard  model  for  masses.  

•  The  post-­‐modern  model:  Individualised  and  diversified  HE  (Rip  and  Mix  Approach/  Patchwork)  

Page 7: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Is  OER  Quality  really  the  ques6on?    

...or  is  it  a  ques6on  of  HE  systems  change?      

How  can  HEI  cater  for  the  Quality  Needs  of  the  21st  Century  Learners?    Can  OERs  help?  

Page 8: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Modern    (Massifica7on  )  HE  Model    

 Postmodern    HE  Model  

Defined  degrees     Short  and  patchwork  study  cycles  

Study  in  a  degree  framework   Study  according  needs  and  interest  

Curriculum  is  oriented  to  professions   No  clear  curriculum,  but  cer6fia6on  needs  

Expert  led/  Prof.  led    knowledge  transfer     Students  are  peers  

Exam  driven/  Cer6fica6on  bound   Learning  experience  in  the  foreground  

Cer6fia6on  of  knowledge/  achievements   Assessment  of  competences  

Ins6tu6on  bound   De-­‐ins6tu6onalised  

Ins6tu6on‘s  reputa6on  determines  value   Experience  +  prac6ce  value  gain  importance  

Clear  6mebound  structure  of  degrees   Flexibilisa6on    

Disciplins  are  structure  giving   Inter-­‐disciplinary/  trans-­‐disciplinary  

Disciplin  oriented:  canon  of  methods  and  knowledge   Problem  oriented  

Academic  status,  tradi6ons,  clothing   individualised  

Differen6a6on  against  „non-­‐higher  educa6on“   Con6nuum  through  ed.-­‐sectors  +  levels  

What  are  the  needs    of  the  21st  century  student?  

The  Vision  of  Open  Educa7on    

Page 9: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

The  Quality  Quest…  

But...  Will learning improve

because (OE)resources are available?

Page 10: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

The  (open)  Quality  Quest  

We  more  and  more  come  to  realise...  •  It  is  not  about  OER  Quality  –  it  is  about  (higher)  educa6on  quality    

•  It  is  not  about  resources  –  it  is  about  prac6ces  

Page 11: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

h2p://www.flickr.com/photos/mamk/587941395/  

The  OER  story  

Phase  1:    Open  it!  

Phase  2:  Improve  quality  

The  Resource    

view  on  Quality

 The  Prac5ce    view  on  Quality  

Page 12: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

The  (OE)Resource  View  on  Quality  

A  vision  to    be  overcome??  

Page 13: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

www.oer-­‐quality.org  

The  (OE)Prac6ce  View  on  Quality  

Page 14: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

www.oer-­‐quality.org  

The  (OE)Prac6ce  View  on  Quality  

Page 15: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review
Page 16: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

www.efquel.org  

www.efquel.org/projects    

Page 17: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

h2p://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/EAP/docum

ents/201405JRC88304.pdf  

Page 18: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

WIKIS  in  educa6on?  (Peer-­‐Produc6on)  

www.efquel.org/projects    

Page 19: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

www.efquel.org/projects    

Open  Learning  Cultures  in  educa6on?    

Page 20: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

Quality  in  Open  Learning  

 More  and  more  we  become  to  realise,  that  

quality  in  educa?on  in  general,  but  specifically  in  open  learning    

becomes  a  federated  responsibility.  

Page 21: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

21

Recogini6on  of  open  learning?    

www.efquel.org/projects    

Page 22: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

The  MOOC  Quality  Project  

12  weeks,  12  experts,  12  posts,    12.000  Readers,  >150  comments   m

ooc.efquel.org

Page 23: Determining the Quality of Open Educational Resources - A State of the Art Review

 European  Founda6on    

for  Quality  in  E-­‐Learning    

www.efquel.org  

[email protected]  

Duale  Hochschule    Baden-­‐Wür2emberg  

 www.dhbw.de  

Thank  you  for  your  a2en6on!