View
99
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Jean-Michel Glachant's Lecture at the 2014 Edition of the International Summer School on regulation of local public services in Turin
Citation preview
Electricity market regulation: lessons learnt (by me) – a 20 years journey…
Turin School of Regulation (8 September 2014) Jean-Michel Glachant - Director Florence School [& Marcelo Saguan - Microeconomix]
first step with markets
same for my first kid…
A great leap forward…
www.florence-school.eu
BUT: is this a “market”… or a regulatory frame?
5
Day-ahead market
Intraday markets
Balancing market
Reserves/ ancillary services
markets
Explicit auctions for transmission
capacity
Implicit auctions
Market coupling
Market splitting
Capacity markets
Bilateral / OTC
Long term contracts
Flexibility market
Baseload product
Peak load product
Congestion management
www.florence-school.eu
market “borders”… and regulatory frame…
6
Grid congestion
Power market
Black-Out
Externality
Grid access
Multilateral or OTC
Grid monopoly
CO2- GHG
Cross-border
www.florence-school.eu
Yes regulation framing a market order… Why? Big issues to be addressed within the market…
• In fact there is different products to market…
• To market at different time horizons: day-ahead, intraday, real time…
• How to integrate these different markets across countries? How does it work?
• Are the “final-final” resulting markets really European or still national?
7
“Final” electricity is a bundle of different products
A whole sequence of “horizon” markets
Integration of national markets
A European market?
NB: focus on wholesale market (retail market is out of scope of this lecture)
www.florence-school.eu
The “physics” of electricity (1)
• Electricity “cannot” economically be stored
• Electricity flows “cannot” be controlled & transmission lines should be operated under “safe flow” limits
– If not risk of “cascading failures” and black-out
8
• Different cost & value of energy at different times Many products differentiated by the time of production & consumption
• Transmission capacity scarce resources Many products differentiated by the location where they are produced/consumed
Implications for electricity productS & related marketS
www.florence-school.eu
The “physics” of electricity (2)
• Power stations can fail suddenly
• Demand can vary sharply over time
• Most stations can only change output slowly and can take many hours to start up
• Demand and generation must match each other continuously
– If not risk of black-out
9
• Gen.Flexibility scarce resource Many products differentiated by ability to change production/consumption at short notice
• Uncertainties Different market horizons to buy/sell the “same” product
• Strong actors coordination needed in real time important role of System Operator in real time
Implications for electricity productS & related marketS
www.florence-school.eu
Should power markets be better… by being regulated? (1)
• First : Electricity’s not a single homogeneous product as Coca Cola
– Differentiated by time horizon of generation/consumption
– Differentiated by location of generation/consumption
– Differentiated by flexibility to modify generation/consumption on short notice
• Second : Electricity’s not only energy (MWh): transmission & system flexibility components are needed
– Transmission capacity & system flexibility (MW of Power) are complementary scarce resources and should be priced for delivery
– Markets might put a price and a delivery priority order to these “invisible” components of electricity
10
www.florence-school.eu
Should power markets be better… by being regulated? (2)
• Third : Electricity trade positions (for energy, transmission, system flexibility) may be reviewed in successive markets until the time of delivery
– Electricity components (energy, transmission, flexibility) are physically delivered only in real time >> all the former exchanges are only “notional” (“virtual”)
– Markets function in a sequence of successive exchange “rounds” for the different electricity components
11
www.florence-school.eu
Sequence of successive markets
The reduced scope of “power markets” in a single zone of “system operation”
12
Short-term Energy markets
Short term Reserves/
flexibility markets
Delivery of the good
Time T-~24h T
Short term Transmission markets
Energy
Transmission
Flexibility Reserves
Real time / balancing
Mechanism (centralised by the SO)
Long-term Energy markets
Long-term Reserves/
flexibility markets
T-~months/years
Long-term Transmission markets
T-~3h
Electricity components
NB: markets for system flexibility are often called “reserves” because the SO reserves some flexible system resources (power station or demand response) to ensure enough system responsiveness (Up or Down) in real time
Power as Energy
Transmission capacity
Reserves as System
Flexibility
Scope
www.florence-school.eu
Several zones of market operation in EU
13
Intraday market
(energy B)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy B)
Intraday Markets
(energy A)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy A)
Country B
Country A
Day ahead Market
(energy B)
Day ahead Market
(energy A)
Day ahead Market
(transmission A-B)
Intraday market
(transmission A-B)
Interconnection capacity
Time
Space
Balancing mechanism
(transmission A-B)
www.florence-school.eu
How does the markets’ sequence “day-ahead> intraday> real time” work in a single country?
14
Intraday market
(energy B)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy B)
Intraday Markets
(energy A)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy A)
Country B
Country A
Day ahead Market
(energy B)
Day ahead Market
(energy A)
Day ahead Market
(transmission A-B)
Intraday market
(transmission A-B)
Interconnection capacity
Time
Space
Balancing mechanism
(transmission A-B)
www.florence-school.eu
Events occur from day-ahead> (to) >real time: power station failure / demand forecast error
15
Po
we
r (M
W)
Po
we
r (M
W)
Produced power Sold quantity
Power station faliure
Imbalance
Imbalance Imbalance
-10000
-8000
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
40000
45000
50000
55000
60000
65000
70000
00
:30
02
:00
03
:30
05
:00
06
:30
08
:00
09
:30
11
:00
12
:30
14
:00
15
:30
17
:00
18
:30
20
:00
21
:30
23
:00
Fore
cast
err
or
[MW
]
Load
[M
W]
France (RTE) - 03/11/2009
DA forecast error Load realisation DA forecast
www.florence-school.eu
Temps réel
A sequence… of energy market positionS adjustements… through timely step
16
Gat
e c
losu
re
Balancing and imbalance settlement
day-ahead market
Intraday markets
T-~24h T-~3h
SP2 SP2
SP3 SP2 SP1
SP2
Contractual position / Nomination
SP1 SP3 SP1 SP3
SP1 SP3
Vo
lum
e (M
Wh
)
Settlement periods Settlement periods
Settlement periods
Vo
lum
e (M
Wh
)
Vo
lum
e (M
Wh
)
Settlement periods
Positive imbalance
Imbalance (ex. net buyer)
Production / Consumption
metering
Negative imbalance
Transactions between market players (with or without market intermediaries)
Transactions with the SO (balancing bid/offers & insuring
imbalance settlement)
Time
www.florence-school.eu
Day-ahead markets organized as “Power Exchanges” (multilateral trade)
17
www.florence-school.eu
Intraday markets (organized -or not) • The intraday markets can be used:
– Purchase/sale of quantities that have not been executed during the Day Ahead market
– Unplanned maintenance after the DA market
– Flexible tool to trade closer to real time
– Arbitrage with neighboring countries
18
www.florence-school.eu
Real-time markets: always organized by the “System Operator” (to “balancing” the whole energy system) Imbalance settlement pricing rule: one or two prices?
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Imb
ala
nce p
rice [
€/M
Wh
]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Dif
f. i
mb
ala
nce p
rices [
€/M
Wh
]
Diff. imbalance prices BE Negative imbalance price BE Positive imbalance price BE
e.g. Belgian positive versus negative imbalance prices
www.florence-school.eu
What does mean “coupling”countries’markets? What do we do? Look at “Day Ahead” horizon…
20
Intraday market
(energy B)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy B)
Intraday Markets
(energy A)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy A)
Country B
Country A
Day ahead Market
(energy B)
Day ahead Market
(energy A)
Day ahead Market
(transmission A-B)
Intraday market
(transmission A-B)
Interconnection capacity
Time
Space
Balancing mechanism
(transmission A-B)
www.florence-school.eu
What’s outcome from coupling market zones?
• Outcome from coupling market zones
– Efficient use of Gen. resources (energy cost; system flex.)
– Uncorrelated demands
– Uncorrelated renewables
Also >> Security of supply
Also <</>>Market power
21
Day ahead Market
(energy B)
Day ahead Market
(energy A)
Day ahead Market
(transmission A-B)
Country B
Country A
www.florence-school.eu
Illustration of market coupling outcome
• Outcome from coupling market zones
– Efficient use of resources
– Uncorrelated demand
– Uncorrelated renewables
22
Source: Menager
(2002)
www.florence-school.eu
But… actual countries’ market coupling is limited by transmission capacity availability…
• We may have to split the EU into several market zones
– when transmission capacity reaches security limit (i.e. there is a congestion)
• Transmission becomes a “too” scarce resource
• Hence a coordinated method of cross-border congestion management helps to operate softly coupling & decoupling of power market zones
23
www.florence-school.eu
Alternative regulation for coupling & decoupling EU power markets
• Explicit grid auctioning
– Separate markets for energy & cross border transmission capacity
– Coordination of these two markets depends on individual ability of market players
• Implicit grid auctioning (market coupling or splitting)
– “Smart” coordination of market borders done by single central algorithm
24
Day-ahead Market
(energy B)
Day-ahead Market
(energy A)
Day-ahead Market
(transmission A-B)
Country B
Country A
Day-ahead Market
(energy A + B)
Single Matching Algorithm takes into
account l imited capacity A-B
Explicit auctions
Implicit auctions
www.florence-school.eu
-Perfect- coupling… and decoupling
25
Country B
Country A Energy Price Difference (A – B)
0 Price A > Price B Price B > Price A
Use of the cross-border capacity
From A to B
From B to A
www.florence-school.eu
Reality of explicit auctioning for crossing borders between France & Spain)
26
Country B
Country A
www.florence-school.eu
Reality of implicit auctioning for crossing borders between France & Belgium
27
Country B
Country A
www.florence-school.eu
Generalising this to a regulatory frame for European internal electricity market
• A single European market? Or a coupling of national markets?
28
Intraday market
(energy B)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy B)
Intraday Markets
(energy A)
Balancing Mechanism
(energy A)
Country B
Country A
Day ahead Market
(energy B)
Day ahead Market
(energy A)
Day ahead Market
(transmission A-B)
Intraday market
(transmission A-B)
Interconnection capacity
Balancing mechanism
(transmission A-B)
www.florence-school.eu
EU market Integration at Day Ahead horizon
29
Hourly day ahead price convergence by region (source: ACER, 2013)
www.florence-school.eu
EU market Integration at Intra-Day horizon
30
www.florence-school.eu
EU market Integration at real time horizon
31
www.florence-school.eu
To conclude: is the EU Internal Market regulation «au menu» or «à la carte»?
www.florence-school.eu 33
Thank you for your attention Email contact: [email protected] Follow me on Twitter: @JMGlachant Read the Journal I am chief-editor of: EEEP “Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy”
My web site: http://www.florence-school.eu