22
Preschoolers’ Emergent Literacy Predicts Attitudes Toward and Perceptions of Reading By: Kirsten T. Craft and Dr. Olivia K. Lima

Emergent literacy

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Academic Presentation on preschoolers' emergent literacy and how it relates to their attitudes and motivations.

Citation preview

Page 1: Emergent literacy

Preschoolers’ Emergent Literacy Predicts Attitudes Toward and

Perceptions of Reading

By: Kirsten T. Craft and Dr. Olivia K. Lima

Page 2: Emergent literacy

Introductionhttp://00.edu-cdn.com/files/static/preschool-reading/12ways.jpg

Page 3: Emergent literacy

Background

• Preschoolers do not come into the classroom as

blank slates

• In home exposure to learning does matter (Fernald,

Marchman & Weisleder, 2013)

• Lower emergent literacy skills (Bowman, Donovan & Burns,

2001)

• Long term negative impacts

• Explained by relationship between perceived ability

and engagement (Fantuzzo, Perry & McDermott, 2004)

• Preschool interventions cited as a solution (Logian, 2006)

• Motivation (Schweinie, 2011)

Page 4: Emergent literacy

Objectives and Hypotheses

• Objectives

• How do attitudes relate to ability?

• How do preschoolers define reading?

• Hypotheses

• Positive attitudes would be associated with high

emergent literacy. Negative attitudes would be

associated with low emergent literacy.

• Preschoolers would rely on books and text to

define reading.

Page 5: Emergent literacy

Methodhttp://www.njfamily.com/NJ-Family/June-2012/Summer-Reading-101/Preschooler-Reading-500.jpg

Page 6: Emergent literacy

Participants

• Participants

• 14 Preschoolers

• Gender

• 9 Males

• 5 Females

• Age

• Mean 4.43 years

• Demographics

• Similar to Sioux Falls

Page 7: Emergent literacy

Materials

• Materials

• Survey questions

and scales

• Artist illustrations

• The Get Ready to

Read Revised (Whitehurst & Lonigan, 2010)

• (M=18.3, SD=3.7)

Illustrated by Esther Rainbow

Page 8: Emergent literacy

Reading vs. Not Reading

Illustrated by Esther Rainbow

Page 9: Emergent literacy

The Get Ready to Read

(Whitehurst & Lonigan, 2010)

Page 10: Emergent literacy

The Get Ready to Read

(Whitehurst & Lonigan, 2010)

Page 11: Emergent literacy

Procedure

• Part One – Day One

• Shown illustrations and asked what they thought

the child was doing

• Open ended questions

• Likert scales used to assess attitudes

• Part Two – Day Two

• Get Ready to Read revised

• Both parts were introduced to children as games

Page 12: Emergent literacy

Resultshttp://fortcollinsreadaloud.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/reading-to-child.jpg

Page 13: Emergent literacy

Objective One• Objective

• How do attitudes relate to ability?

• Hypothesis

• Positive attitudes would be associated with high emergent literacy

and negative attitudes would be associated with low emergent

literacy.

• Results

• Negative attitudes (M=4) were associated with with high emergent

emergent literacy and more positive attitudes (M=4.43) were

associated with low emergent literacy.

• Preschoolers with high emergent literacy skills reported that they

knew less about reading (M= 3.14) than preschoolers with below

average emergent literacy skills (M=4.14).

• It did not reach significance (P=.21)

Page 14: Emergent literacy

Graphic Visuals

How Much Do You Know How Much Do You Like

Above Average Below Average0

1

2

3

4

5

Series1

Above Average Below Average0

1

2

3

4

5

Series1

Page 15: Emergent literacy

Objective Two• Objective

• How do preschoolers define reading

• Hypothesis

• Preschoolers would rely on books and text to define reading.

• Results

• More limited interpretation of reading than adult comparison

• Reliance on books

• Adults included more complex interpretations

Page 16: Emergent literacy

Other Interesting Findings

• Do you know how to read?

• No clear relationship between emergent literacy and self reported

ability to read

• “Yeah because I am four”

• “No because I am too little”

• “Yeah because I learned it”

• Is learning how to read important?

• Preschoolers with high emergent literacy skills were more likely to

report intrinsic motivations towards reading.

• Intrinsic “Yeah it helps you learn”

• Extrinsic “Yeah so you can do it when your teacher tells you to”

• Uncertain “Yeah cause I do not know”

Page 17: Emergent literacy

Discussionhttp://www.kinderpillar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/preschoolers-reading.jpg

Page 18: Emergent literacy

Explanation of Results• Objective One

• Preschoolers with high emergent literacy may have a more realistic

understanding of what reading is.

• Like it less

• Report knowing less

• Objective Two

• Preschoolers may not have had advanced exposure to literacy

• Other Findings

• Preschoolers may have different interpretations of what “knowing

how to read” is

• Preschoolers with high emergent literacy may have been taught

differently

Page 19: Emergent literacy

Macro Level Application• Preschool Interventions

• No link between perceived ability and actual

ability

• Link between motivation type and actual ability

• Classroom changes

• Preschool is a good time

• Focus on motivational drives

Page 20: Emergent literacy

Micro Level Application• At home

• Focus on showing preschoolers why reading is

important (Wingle, Martin & Bennett, 2006)

• Do not worry if a preschooler reports not knowing

much about a subject area

• Work to expose preschoolers to more complex

forms of literacy

Page 21: Emergent literacy

Thank Youhttp://montclairhistorical.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/preschool-girl-smiling.jpg

http://montclairhistorical.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/preschool-girl-smiling.jpg

Page 22: Emergent literacy

Work Cited…