81
ESS3808 Sport Psychology Martin I. Jones BSc MSc Phd PGCHE CPsychol CSci AFBPsS SFHEA

Ess3808 week 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ess3808 week 3

ESS3808Sport Psychology

Martin I. JonesBSc MSc Phd PGCHE CPsychol CSci AFBPsS SFHEA

Page 2: Ess3808 week 3

Mental Toughness

Page 3: Ess3808 week 3

What is the most important psychological variable that

differentiates the great from

the good?

Page 4: Ess3808 week 3

Mental toughness

One of the most used by least understood concepts in the domain of sport

Why?

Page 5: Ess3808 week 3

Those personality characteristics that are most important in peoples' lives will

eventually become a part of their language

More important personality characteristics are more likely to be encoded into language as

a single word

Page 6: Ess3808 week 3

Mental toughness

One of the most used by least understood concepts in the domain of sport

Still?

Page 7: Ess3808 week 3

What is mental toughness and where did it come from ?

Page 8: Ess3808 week 3

Cattell (1957)Viewed tough-minded individuals as

self-reliant realistic

responsible contrasted this with emotional sensitivity.

Page 9: Ess3808 week 3

What kind of construct is mental toughness?Is it a trait, a type, a state of mind, an attitude, or a dynamic socially learned skill?

Page 10: Ess3808 week 3
Page 11: Ess3808 week 3

The ability to consistently perform toward the upper range of ones talent and skill, regardless of competitive circumstances

Page 12: Ess3808 week 3

Terry Orlick et al.Characteristics of elite athletes

Page 13: Ess3808 week 3

1. the ability to cope with and control anxiety2. confidence 3. mental toughness/resiliency 4. sport intelligence 5. the ability to focus and block out distractions; 6. competitiveness 7. a hard-work ethic 8. the ability to set and achieve goals 9. coachability 10.high levels of dispositional hope 11.Optimism12.adaptive perfectionism

Page 14: Ess3808 week 3
Page 15: Ess3808 week 3

Proliferation of researchHardiness + confidencevs.Cluster/constellation of characteristics

Page 16: Ess3808 week 3

Jones et al. (2002)“HAVING THE NATURAL OR DEVELOPED PSYCHOLOGICAL EDGE THAT ENABLES YOU TO: 1) GENERALLY, COPE BETTER THAN YOUR OPPONENTS WITH THE MANY DEMANDS (COMPETITION, TRAINING, LIFESTYLE) THAT SPORT PLACES ON A PERFORMER; AND 2) SPECIFICALLY, BE MORE CONSISTENT AND BETTER THANYOUR OPPONENTS IN REMAINING DETERMINED, FOCUSED, CONFIDENT AND IN CONTROL UNDER PRESSURE”

(P.209)

Page 17: Ess3808 week 3

Jones et al. (2002)GENERALLY COPE BETTER THAN YOUR OPPONENTS WITH THE MANY DEMANDS THAT SPORT PLACES ON A PERFORMER

SPECIFICALLY, BE MORE CONSISTENT AND BETTER THAN YOUR OPPONENTS IN REMAINING DETERMINED, FOCUSED, CONFIDENT AND IN CONTROL UNDER PRESSURE

Page 18: Ess3808 week 3
Page 19: Ess3808 week 3

Mental toughness to be a trait-like quality that determines, in some part, how individuals perform when exposed to stressors, pressure and challenge

Clough et al., 2002

Page 20: Ess3808 week 3

Mentally tough individuals tend to be sociable and outgoing; as they are able to remain calm and relaxed, they are competitive in many situations and have lower anxiety levels than others. With a high sense of self-belief and an unshakeable faith that they can control their own destiny, these individuals remain relatively unaffected by competition oradversity”

(Clough et al., 2002,p. 38)

Page 21: Ess3808 week 3

The Four C’s – a summaryTogether these give rise to Mental Toughness (apparently)

Control - I really believe I can do it - I can keep my emotions in check when doing itCommitment - I promise to do it and will set goals - I will do what it takes to keep those promisesChallenge - I can see the opportunity - I am motivated to do it Confidence - I believe I have the ability to do it - I can argue my corner if I need to

Page 22: Ess3808 week 3

TaskRank Jones et al.’s mental toughness attributes

Which attribute is the most important?

Rank-order the attributes in terms of their importance to the ideal mentally tough performer (with 1 being the most important and 12 being the least important).

Page 23: Ess3808 week 3
Page 24: Ess3808 week 3
Page 25: Ess3808 week 3

ProblemsDoes not represent what mental toughness is, but rather what mental toughness can allow athletes to do

Page 26: Ess3808 week 3

OpportunityDoes not represent what mental toughness is, but rather what mental toughness can allow athletes to do

Page 27: Ess3808 week 3

ProblemsMental toughness may have variousidiosyncratic meanings to different athletes in different sports

Page 28: Ess3808 week 3

Bull et al. (2005) Suggested different forms of mental toughness,

Final putt or pressure mental toughness

endurance mental toughness

Mental toughness in relation to heavy training schedules;

Mental toughness in circumstances of extreme physical danger

Page 29: Ess3808 week 3

Jones et al. (2002)Socially constructed cultural ideals

Aka. Fantasy researchsee Andersen 2011

Page 30: Ess3808 week 3

Ladies and gentlemen, I present the mentally tough athlete

Page 31: Ess3808 week 3

AGREED UPON DEFINITION (BY JONES ET AL., 2002) BUT

CHANGED THE WORD

GENERALLY COPE BETTER TO

ALWAYS COPE BETTERThelwell, Weston, Greenless (2005)

Page 32: Ess3808 week 3

Never ever use absolute language; It is always false

Page 33: Ess3808 week 3

Mental toughness represents a higher-order concept that accounts for the shared variance among a group of personal resources or assets

Page 34: Ess3808 week 3

Specifically, the common conceptually identifiable element among these personal resources or assets is a process driving consistently high levels of performance.

Page 35: Ess3808 week 3

An inherent feature of this conceptualization is that mental

toughness resides within an individual and – although providing a foundation for

performance consistency – is imperfectly translated into behaviour or

action

Page 36: Ess3808 week 3

Is imperfectly translated into behaviour or

action

Page 37: Ess3808 week 3

So, what's mental weakness?Provide a definition of the contrast pole

Page 38: Ess3808 week 3

A definition of everything?A collection of experientially developed and inherent sport-general and sport specific values, attitudes, cognitions, and emotions that influence the way in which an individual approaches, responds to, and appraises both negatively and positively construed pressures, challenges, and adversities to consistently achieve his or her goals.

Page 39: Ess3808 week 3

MT Attribute Description Example

Being confident Having faith in your ability to achieve goals

In the lead and no thought of looking back

Galvanizing motivation and desire Possessing a determined work ethic

Training hard irrespective of the conditions

Effectively dealing with adversity and failure

Fortitude in the face of adversity and setbacks

A slow start is not linked to cause and a effect outcomes

Overcoming physical /emotional pain & hardship

Pushing the envelope beyond previous sessions

The experience of exhaustion is interpreted as a challenge and sought out not avoided

Optimal management of aversive levels of anxiety and emotions

Accepting competitive anxiety as part of the competitive situation

Thoughts/feelings/behaviours of nervousness are deemed to be illustrative of excitement and not detrimental to performance

Staying focused Present moment thinking and connected with task specific stimuli

Thoughts about what can and can not be controlled are correctly appraised

A balanced perspective Being able to switch on and off to ensure emotional and psychological well-being is maintained

Taking time away fro the sport and reconnecting with other aspects of your life

Page 40: Ess3808 week 3

A belief in your abilities to achieve success

The ability to continue on during adversity

Focus on what is relevant

Desire to achieve and act on such thoughts

Awareness and understanding of performance

An awareness of and ability to use emotions

Tendency to expect positive events

To thrive when challenged

Self-belief

Resilience

Attention control

Success mindset

Contextintelligence

Emotional awareness

and regulation

Optimistic thinking

Handle challenge

GMental

toughness

Conceptual overview, adapted from Gucciardi et al. (2011)

Page 41: Ess3808 week 3
Page 42: Ess3808 week 3
Page 43: Ess3808 week 3

Strive

ThriveSurvive

Page 44: Ess3808 week 3

Mental toughness process vs mental toughness orientation?

Page 45: Ess3808 week 3

How do you measure mental

toughness?

Page 46: Ess3808 week 3

Psychological PerformanceInventory

(PPI; Loehr, 1986)

Page 47: Ess3808 week 3

Alternative-Psychological Performance Inventory

(PPI-A; Golby, Sheard & van Wersch, 2007

Page 48: Ess3808 week 3

Mental Toughness Questionnaire

(MTQ48; Clough et al., 2002 )

Page 49: Ess3808 week 3

Sport Mental Toughness Questionnaire

(SMTQ; Sheard, Golby &van Wersch, 2009)

Page 50: Ess3808 week 3

Mental Toughness Index(MTI; Gucciardi et al., 2015)

Page 51: Ess3808 week 3

And more . . .

Page 52: Ess3808 week 3

Construct development (Clough, et al., (2002) Perceptual and behavioural differences

Mental toughness and stress buffering – links with hardiness (Clough, et al., 2002)

Fawcett (2005) transferability an issue. Effective lifestyle management

Development of MT, importance of environmental contexts (Connaughton, et al., (2008)

Page 53: Ess3808 week 3

Genes. No association between serotonin transporter 5-HTT and positive psychological attributes

Bull et al. (2005) relationship between MT and behavioural tendencies in cricketers.

Crust and Clough (2005) found association with levels of MT and pain tolerance

Page 54: Ess3808 week 3

Assessment of complex concepts is almost always prone to measurement error, and failure to correct for this error in data analyses can bias substantive conclusions

(Schmidt & Hunter, 1996).

Page 55: Ess3808 week 3

Construct proliferation? Empirical distinctiveness & logical (conceptual) distinctiveness

Page 56: Ess3808 week 3

Mental toughnessHardinessResilienceMutton

Constructs?

Page 57: Ess3808 week 3

Jingle-jangle fallacies Erroneous assumptions that two different things are the same because they bear the

same name (jingle fallacy) or that two identical or almost identical things are different because they are labelled differently

(jangle fallacy).

Page 58: Ess3808 week 3

Empirically distinct?If constructs are empirically distinct, then they will correlate considerably less than 1.00 after the appropriate corrections for bias due to measurement error.

High correlations might mean that athletes may not see constructs differently in the real world

Page 59: Ess3808 week 3

Var(X) = Var(p) + Var(po) + Var(pi : s) + Var(ps) + Var(e)

(Lee et al., 2009)

Page 60: Ess3808 week 3

Var(X) is observed variance

Page 61: Ess3808 week 3

Var(p) is variance due to the construct of interest

Page 62: Ess3808 week 3

Var(po) is transient error variance

Page 63: Ess3808 week 3

Var(pi:s) is item specific factor error variance

Page 64: Ess3808 week 3

Var(ps) is scale specific factor error variance

Page 65: Ess3808 week 3

Var(e) is random response error varaince

Page 66: Ess3808 week 3

Discriminant validityWhether concepts or measurements that are supposed to be unrelated are, in fact, unrelated

Page 67: Ess3808 week 3

Take home messageThere are multiple sources of variance that we need to consider when establishing relationships between constructs.

Researchers create a problem by ignoring or failing to take into account the effects of all the measurement artefacts in self-report measures in research

Page 68: Ess3808 week 3

Current Research

Page 69: Ess3808 week 3

Self determination theory and mental toughnessDoes BPNT theory provide an explanation for the development of MT?

Page 70: Ess3808 week 3

Mahoney et al., 2014

Page 71: Ess3808 week 3

Mahoney et al., 2014

Page 72: Ess3808 week 3

Reward Sensitivity and mental toughness“neuropsychological” explanation for mental toughness?

Page 73: Ess3808 week 3

Reward sensitivity is underpinned by a neurological network known as the Behavioral activation system (BAS),

By responding to rewarding stimuli in the environment, this system is proposed to be responsible for all goal-focused approach behaviour

Page 74: Ess3808 week 3

Punishment sensitivity is underpinned by acombination of the fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) and the behavioural inhibition system (BIS)

The BIS is engaged during aversive stimuli (i.e., remove him- or herself from the situation).

Page 75: Ess3808 week 3

Hardy et al., 2014

Page 76: Ess3808 week 3

(Delaney et al., 2015)

Page 77: Ess3808 week 3

Military and mental toughness“neuropsychological” explanation for mental toughness?

Page 78: Ess3808 week 3

Military Training Mental Toughness InventoryMilitary specific MT measurement tool

Page 79: Ess3808 week 3

Arthur et al., 2015

Page 80: Ess3808 week 3

Pain and mental toughnessIs mental toughness associated with pain experiences?

Page 81: Ess3808 week 3

Martin I. JonesBSc MSc PhD CPsychol CSci AFBPsS SFHEA

[email protected]@drmijones