1. Associate Professor Janet Clinton Professor Stephen Dinham
The Centre for Program Evaluation Melbourne Graduate School of
Education Australian College of Educators Professor John Hattie
Professor Robert Lingard Dr Glenn Savage Ruth Aston The Centre for
Program Evaluation The Centre for Program Evaluation Dr Amy
Gullickson Ru Ying Cai Melbourne Education Research Institute The
Centre for Program Evaluation Australian College of Educators The
Centre for Program Evaluation
2. Agenda Presenter Welcome University of Melbourne
Introduction to the Evaluation of the implementation of the
Standards AITSL Jurisdictional context in relation to the Standards
Jurisdictional representative Standards in Education Expert
University of Melbourne Evaluation University of Melbourne Activity
1: Implementation mapping by initiative Activity 2: Defining
implementation success University of Melbourne Afternoon tea
Activity 3: Assessing implementation success University of
Melbourne Questions AITSL team University of Melbourne team Closing
comments University of Melbourne
3. Dual purpose: improvement career progression Map
progression: Graduate Proficient Highly Accomplished Lead
4. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine the:
usefulness of the implementation of the Standards effectiveness of
implementation of the Standards impact of the implementation of the
Standards on improving teacher quality This is not an evaluation of
the content of the Standards.
5. Adapted from the Centres for Disease Control &
Prevention Framework
6. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine the:
usefulness of the implementation of the Standards effectiveness of
implementation of the Standards impact of the implementation of the
Standards on improving teacher quality This is not an evaluation of
the content of the Standards.
8. In your group: 1. Map current activities and the responsible
organisation in black 2. Map up-coming activities and the
responsible organisation in blue 3. Map potential activities and
the responsible organisation in red Please use the full name of any
document, organisation or group you refer to.
9. In your group: Discuss what successful implementation looks
like. i.e. How do you know the implementation of the initiative has
been successful? On butchers paper, list the features of successful
implementation for your chosen initiative.
10. By yourself: Assess your two examples using the success
criteria rubric provided As a table: Discuss your individual
assessment of the examples with your table, and come to a consensus
on a final rating for each of the success criteria for both
examples Make note of the debate on your table As a whole group:
Talk through your final assessment of the examples with the whole
group
11. The examples Not ideal but a range Its about progression
Different elements of success Score against each of the success
criteria and explain why Success criteria Whats missing? Do they
work? The commentary The debates The gaps
12. Collate Analyse Provide feedback
13. Do you have any questions for The University of Melbourne
evaluation team? the AITSL team?
14. the Evaluation team A/Professor Janet Clinton
[email protected] +61 9035 3697 Dr Amy Gullickson
[email protected] +61 9035 9682 Ms Ruth Aston
[email protected] +61 9035 8350 AITSL aitsl.edu.au
newsroom.aitsl.edu.au @ [email protected] @aitsl
www.facebook.com/aitsl iTunes U > Australian Institute for
Teaching and School Leadership youtube.com/aitsleduau
