10
By Miguel Angel Carranza, MsE.

Evaluation.2011intro

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation.2011intro

By Miguel Angel Carranza, MsE.

Page 2: Evaluation.2011intro

Quotes on Evaluation“It can not be denied that a great deal of

language testing is of very poor quality...they (the tests) often fail to measure accurately whatever it is they are intended to measure” (Hughes, 2000).

“Many beginning teachers believe that their most important or only responsibility is to selecteffective instructional procedures” (Sax, 2002).

Page 3: Evaluation.2011intro

Characteristics of a Good Test1. Validity: The extent to which a test measures

what it is supposed to measure.The truthfulness or accuracy within the score of a test or interpretation of an experiment.

How should a reading or listening test be designed?What does the TOEFL evaluate?

2. Reliability (consistency) : The extent to which individual differences are measured consistently. Does a clasroom, its conditions or the environment affect students` results? E.g: a marching band… health or personal problems:a fever. Taking the listening part at a noisy place? With poor equipement?Being drunk or sober?

Page 4: Evaluation.2011intro

3. Practicality Financial limitations, time constraints, ease of

administation, and scoring and interpreation.

Page 5: Evaluation.2011intro

Types of testsA) Placement test

B) Diagnostic test

C) Progress or achievement test*

D) Proficiency test

__ designed to measure how much a student has learned at a given moment in a course.

__ designed to get a general picture of a student’s knowledge and ability.

__ designed to measure a student’s strengths and weaknesses in order to better things

__ designed to fit new students in a course according to their level of language competence.

Page 6: Evaluation.2011intro

But , why do we evaluate?to measure students` learningto measure teaching effectiveness and to

improve it!To provide feedack to students, to

teachers, and parents!To diagnose students´ weaknesses and

strengthsto identify which students are in need of

remedial or advance work.To teach without evaluation is a

contradiction in terms” (Sax, 1997).

Page 7: Evaluation.2011intro

Key Terms in evaluation

A test: is a task or series of tasks used to obtain

systematic observations, usually paper andpencil procedure, about sts´s performance.

Measurement: is the process that assignsnumbers to attributes or characteristics ofpersons, objects, or events according to

explicitformulations or rules. More quantitative

Page 8: Evaluation.2011intro

Assessment vrs EvaluationAssessment: the process of collecting,

synthesizing, and interpreting information to aid in decision making. More qualitative

Evaluation: the process of determining the value or worth of a program, course, or other initiative, toward the ultimate goal of making decisions about adopting, rejecting, or revising the innovation. Evaluation is the more inclusive term, often making use of assessment data in addition to many other data sources.

Page 9: Evaluation.2011intro

Discrete point testing vrs integrative testingDiscrete point testing refers to measuring

one element at a time, item by item: a series of items, each testing particular grammatical structures.

Integrative requires the candidate to combine many language elements in the completion of a task.

Discrete point testing will be indirect and Integrative will be direct.

Page 10: Evaluation.2011intro

Direct and indirect test items

It is direct if it asks candidates to perform the communicative skill which is being tested ( through a composition, oral interview)

Indirect items: measure a students´ knowledge and ability by getting at what lies beneath their receptive and productive skills ( controlled items: multiple choice type for example).