ofSubmitted by

India is a very large country with an EEZ of 2 million km2, a continental shelf of some 500 000 km2, and ranks as the world’s fourth-largest fish producer, after China, Peru and Japan. Marine capture fisheries contribute less than half of the national fish production (48.7 percent in 2000), the remainder coming from inland fisheries, inland aquaculture and brackishwater aquaculture. This situation changed with the development of technology/modernization; dried products gave way to canned and frozen items. The product shift also resulted in market shift. More sophisticated and affluent markets like Aquaculture has become the mainstay of seafood exports, accounting for 90 per cent of current shrimp exports. The aquaculture harvest in 2011 had been very good, including Japan, USA, Europe and Australia, became our important buyers.

The lack of an overarching and coherent policy for coastal and deep-sea capture fisheries contributes to the weak structure of the sector. The current legal framework is dated, production oriented, and fails to provide a clear mandate and a framework for responsible fisheries management.

A new legal framework is required to define the objectives of marine resource management for the national and state administrations. Employment, increased production, welfare of fishermen and increased export earnings are the main aims pursued by the Government in its recent five year plans.

Efforts aimed at fisheries focus on infrastructure enhancement (ports and post harvest facilities) and modernisation of the fleet implemented through direct investments and subsidy schemes. Much less effort is aimed at resource appraisal, management and conservation of the resources. No single Ministry is responsible for managing the fisheries sector.

To improve the percentage of marine products exports reach in future at least 5% of total exports.

To improve the exports value also rise the Indian economy To focus on exports while having good resource in marine products to utilize

To give more job opportunities in Marine industry.

To be create new legal framework is required to define the objectives of marine resource management for the national and state administrations. Efforts aimed at fisheries focus on infrastructure enhancement (ports and post harvest facilities) and modernisation of the fleet implemented through direct investments and subsidy schemes.

To be modernising with increased mechanisation, but traditional small-scale craft stall remain responsible for these large catches. The east coast sector is modernising at a slower pace. Offshore fishing, or deep sea fishing, is still very much under-utilized in India.

To find the overall performance of MPEDA in international trade.

To analysis product wise export of MPEDA in international trade.

To Identify country wise export of MPEDA in international trade.

To find the export performance in forthcoming years using Trend analysis.

To implement the other strategies, requirements, suggestions for marine products exporters make it a success.

1. The finding of the study is applicable only to Marine products of over all india’s international trade.

2. Data has restricted only to MPEDA

3. It is restricted to 10years only.

4. Data collected will show only the approximate value not accurate value.

In this project using only Secondary Data. It is an integral part of any research study as it provides information on variables, which plays a major part in the actual research. The source of secondary data includes.Various books, journals, magazines, newspapers & Pamlets. Internet ( Email, Commerce websites)

The sampling size is estimated to be 10 years. (8 major items & 16 major exporting countries)

The period of the study is 3 months

The study has been carried out in MPEDA’s export performance in india’s marine exports.

The Marine Products Export Development Authority Acts as a coordinating agency with different Central and State Government establishments engaged in marine products and allied activities. The role envisaged for the MPEDA under the statute is comprehensive - covering fisheries of all kinds, increasing exports, specifying standards, processing, marketing, extension and training in various aspects of the industry. The Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA) was constituted in 1972 under the Marine Products Export Development Authority Act

Conservation and management of fishery resources and development of offshore fishing.

Registration of exporters and processing plants. Regulations of marine products export. Laying down standards and specifications. Acting as an agency for extension of relief as

per directions from Government. Helping the industry in relation to market

intelligence, export promotion, and import of essential items.

Imparting training in different aspects of the marine products industry, with special reference to quality control, processing and marketing.

Promotion of commercial shrimp farming. Promotion of joint ventures in aquaculture,

production, processing and marketing of value added seafood.

20046% 2005

7%20067%

20078%

20087%

20097%

201010%

201112%

201217%

201319%

% of exports /10years exports

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%2.08%

1.72%1.54% 1.40%

1.06%0.84%

1.17% 1.04% 1.13% 1.15%

% OF MARINE EXPORTS/TOTAL COMMODITY

0.00

2,000.00

4,000.00

6,000.00

8,000.00

10,000.00

12,000.00

14,000.00

16,000.00

18,000.00

20,000.006,

105.

63

6,46

9.22

7,03

5.91

8,00

1.04

6,92

6.67

7,06

6.37

9,89

9.98

11,9

17.1

1

16,5

84.7

1

18,8

41.2

0

MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORTS –(2004-2013) Rs in crores

2014 2015 2016 2017 20180.00

5000.00

10000.00

15000.00

20000.00

25000.00

30000.00

1707

3.82

1894

1.66

2092

2.38

2301

5.01 25

276.

30

FUTURE MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORTS

(value in crores)

COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE - (2004-2013)

MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORTS 11.93%

INDIA’S TOTAL EXPORTs 10.19%

20048%

20058%

20068%

20079%

20088%

20097%2010

8%

201111%

201216%

201318%

FROZEN SHRIMP

20043%

20054%

20066%

20078%

20087%

200910%

201011%

201115%

201218%

201318%

FROZEN FISH

20045%

20056%

20066%

20079%

20089%

20099%

201011%

201113%

201216%

201316%

FROZEN CUTTLE FISH

20045% 2005

7%

20068%

20078%

20086%

20099%

20109%

201114%

201217%

201319%

FROZEN SQUID

20043%

20053% 2006

4%

20076% 2008

6%

200910%

201013%

201112%

201217%

201326%

CHILLED ITEMS

20044% 2005

5%20066%

20078%

20089%

200911%

201010%

201112%

201217%

201318%

OTHERS

20045%

20055%

20066%

20076%

20087%

200910%

201014%

201114%

201215%

201319%

LIVE ITEMS

20043%

20053%

20063% 2007

4%20086%

20099%

201021%2011

21%

201212%

201318%

DRIED ITEM

20048%

20058%

20068%

20079%

20088%

20099%

20109%

201112%

201215%

201314%

JAPAN

20049%

20059%

20069%

20077%

20086%2009

6%

20106%

201111%

201216%

201322%

USA

20046% 2005

6%20067%

200710%

20088%

200911%2010

15%

201116%

201210%

201312%

CHINA

200411%

20057%

20066%

20075%

20087%

20098%

201011%

201110%

201216%

201318%

UMITED ARAB EMIRATES

20047%

20056%

20067%

20076%

20088%

20097%

201014%

201112%

201217%

201319%

SINGAPORE

20043%

20053% 2006

3% 20074%

20085%

20096%

201024%

201119%

201215%

201317%

HONG KONG

20048%

20057%

20069%

20078%

200810%

200910%

201011%

201110%

201213%

201314%

U K

20045%

20055%

20066%

20077%

20088%

200911%

201013%

201112%

201215%

201317%

GERMANY

20042%

20052%

20067%

20079%

200810%

200912%

20108%

201112%

201216%

201321%

BELGIUM

20044% 2005

5%20066%

20078%

20089%

200911%

201010%

201112%

201217%

201318%

ITALY

200411.4%

20059.0%

20061.3%20070.4%20081.6%20090.3%

201016.5%

201111.3%

201214.8%

201333.3%

BANGLADESH

20046%

200510%

2006

3%2007

4%2008

3%2009

3%201020%2011

15%

201217%

201319%

NETHERLAND

20045% 2005

6%

2006

5%2007

5%

20087%

20098%

201021%

201113%

201215%

201316%

SRI LANKA

20040.13%

20050.35%

20060.93%

20070.56%

20080.28%

20090.16%

20108.06%

201119.49%

201226.04%

201343.99%

SAUDI ARABIA

20043% 2005

5% 20063%

20071%

20089% 2009

1%

20106%

201116%

201225%

201330%

INDONESIA

20043%

20056%

20069%

20077%

200811%

20097%

201013%

201116%

201214%

201314%

KOREA

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

5.17

%

1.20

%

5.49

%

-12.

53%

-4.1

1% 10.6

5%

36.7

2%

42.9

7%

18.7

3%

FROZEN SHRIMP

0.00

%

22.3

2%

31.5

4%

45.4

8%

-10

.29% 32

.14%

18.0

0%

29.1

1%

25.1

6%

0.39

%

FROZEN FISH

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

8.93

% 15.8

5%

45.2

0%

-6.6

8%

2.27

%

21.3

9%

19.5

6%

21.9

2%

0.56

%FROZEN CUTTLE FISH

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

27.9

8%

20.5

9%

-1.2

5%

-28.

14% 54

.83%

-1.5

4%

62.3

1% 21.5

3%

12.2

0%

FROZEN SQUID

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-16.

93%

9.54

% 38.1

7%

41.3

4%

62.5

3% 133.

18%

-2.6

7%

-41.

08%

45.7

2%

DRIED ITEM

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

-0.6

9%

21.6

1%

3.80

%

7.83

%

43.3

3%

40.5

5%

2.16

%

8.76

% 28.0

0%

LIVE ITEMS

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

6.41

%

19.7

0% 43.8

2%

0.68

%

84.0

2%

21.6

9%

-2.6

3%

38.7

8%

50.2

7%

CHILLED ITEMS

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

22.18% 20.82%17.36%

15.27% 25.48%

-7.45%

20.72%

36.58%

5.21%

OTHERS

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

3.33

%

-3.8

7%

17.0

8%

-9.2

9% 0.52

% 4.50

%

30.5

4% 27.1

6%

-6.5

9%

JAPAN

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

-7.4

9%

5.34

%

-17.

78%

-24.

55%

0.45

% -0.8

8% 96.5

7%

49.6

0%

35.2

3%

USA

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

2.48

% 22.5

3% 36.2

0%

-12

.74%

28.4

1%

38.1

4%

10.4

4%

-36

.33%

14.7

4%

CHINA

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

-36.

40%

-18.

93% -7

.22% 36

.16%

16.3

9% 33.4

2%

-7.0

4%

56.3

0%

15.0

0%

UMITED ARAB EMIRATES

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-7.0

9% 4.84

%

-13.

24%

33.0

2%

-14.

00%

110.

45%

-16.

27%

44.4

6%

11.5

7%

SINGAPORE

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

-16.

27%

19.4

5%

13.9

0%

22.4

5%

20.0

7%

311.

57%

-19.

83%

-22.

06%

11.9

4%

HONG KONG

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

-6.8

1%

26.9

6%

-10.

08%

23.4

4%

-4.2

7%

10.3

2%

-6.8

8% 32.5

1%

4.93

%

UK

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

1.47

%

32.1

9%

12.6

6%

13.4

6%

35.4

2% 19.8

2%

-10.

54%

29.9

5%

12.3

3%

GERMANY

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

-14.

73%

216.

07%

38.0

3%

13.8

5%

20.1

3%

-31.

65%

44.6

2%

27.8

5%

35.9

7%

BELGIUM

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

6.12

%

11.0

2%

-0.7

2%

7.05

%

26.7

2% 97.5

4%

-86.

85%

842.

00%

15.5

1%

ITALY

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

-20

.51%

-85

.33% -

66.2

5%

249.

47% -

77.8

6%

4677

.55% -

31.9

2%

31.7

1%

124.

19%

BANGLADESH

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

63.7

6%

-65.

48%

18.5

1%

-29.

31%

15.7

1%

514.

21%

-26.

90%

19.0

7%

8.20

%

NETHERLAND

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

24.4

6%

-12

.63% -

13.1

6% 46.2

1%

19.5

0%

163.

85%

-36

.55%

15.6

3%

4.83

%

SRI LANKA

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

177.

36%

163.

95%

-39.

95%

-50.

64%

-40.

87%

4830

.88

%

141.

63%

33.6

5%

68.9

1%

SAUDI ARABIA

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

54.3

0%

-33.

41%

-79.

88%

1173

.82

%

-83.

56% 31

7.01

%

171.

79%

57.7

8%

18.4

4%

INDONESIA

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

77.4

4%

51.9

6%

-17.

65%

54.9

0%

-33.

37%

72.4

7%

20.8

1%

-8.6

5%

-2.9

6%

KOREA

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

4000.00

620.

7

759.

3

998.

7

1,45

2.9

1,30

3.4

1,72

2.3

2,03

2.3

2,62

3.9

3,28

4.1

3,29

6.9

3,54

4.2

3,92

1.1

4,29

0.8

4,66

1.5

5,08

2.1FROZEN FISH

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

1000.00

2000.00

435.

2

474.

0

549.

1

797.

4

744.

1

761.

0

923.

8

1,10

4.6

1,34

6.7

1,35

4.3

1,43

4.2

1,55

7.9

1,67

4.8

1,78

6.3

1,93

3.5FROZEN CUTTLE FISH

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

1000.00

2000.00

372.

9

477.

3

575.

5

568.

3

408.

4

632.

3

622.

6

1,01

0.6

1,22

8.2

1,37

8.1

1,28

9.6

1,41

9.9

1,56

9.1

1,74

1.3

1,91

4.2FROZEN SQUID

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

51.1

50.7

61.7

64.1

69.1 99.0 13

9.1

142.

2

154.

6

197.

9

193.

1

215.

4

237.

0

259.

1

279.

1LIVE ITEMS

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00500.00

1000.001500.00

145.

7

121.

0

132.

6

183.

2

258.

9

420.

7 981.

1

954.

9

562.

6

819.

9

985.

6

1,11

3.4

1,22

9.6

1,32

9.3

1,40

9.1DRIED ITEM

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

400.00

800.00

64.0

68.1

81.6

117.

3

118.

1

217.

3

264.

5

257.

5

357.

4

537.

1

465.

1

529.

3

593.

6

656.

5

719.

8CHILLED ITEMS

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180.00

500.001000.001500.002000.002500.00

389.

2

475.

6

574.

6

674.

3

777.

3

975.

3

902.

6

1,08

9.7

1,48

8.2

1,56

5.8

1,59

5.8

1,74

3.7

1,89

3.4

2,04

4.9

2,19

5.6OTHERS

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

5000.00

10000.00

15000.00

4,01

3.1

4,22

0.7

4,27

1.5

4,50

6.1

3,94

1.6

3,77

9.8

4,18

2.4

5,71

8.1

8,17

5.3

9,70

6.4

8,08

5.5

8,88

8.9

9,79

7.5

10,7

71.9

11,8

30.2FROZEN SHRIMP

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

2000.00

4000.00

1,68

2.1

1,55

6.1

1,63

9.2

1,34

7.8

1,01

6.9

1,02

1.6

1,01

2.5

1,99

0.3

2,97

7.5

4,02

6.5

2,88

7.2

3,27

2.6

3,69

8.2

4,20

1.8

4,69

1.8USA

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

1000.00

2000.00

676.

5

693.

3

849.

4

1,15

7.0

1,00

9.6

1,29

6.4

1,79

0.9

1,97

7.8

1,25

9.2

1,44

4.9

1,83

9.1

1,94

4.8

2,01

9.7

2,08

2.9

2,17

5.2CHINA

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0200400600800

325.

1

206.

8

167.

6

155.

5

211.

8

246.

5

328.

9

305.

7

477.

8

549.

5

469.

6

545.

8

611.

2

669.

9

719.

1UMITED ARAB EMIRATES

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

100

200

300

400

93.2

86.6

90.8

78.8 104.

8

90.1

189.

7

158.

8

229.

5

256.

0

241.

9

271.

7

301.

7

332.

4

358.

2SINGAPORE

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

500

1000

1500

109.

5

91.7

109.

6

124.

8

152.

8

183.

5 755.

1

605.

3

471.

8

528.

1

674.

1

764.

2

847.

9

925.

0

987.

7

HONG KONG

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

200400600800

278.

3

259.

4

329.

3

296.

1

365.

6

350.

0

386.

1

359.

5

476.

3

499.

8

490.

6

521.

0

544.

4

578.

4

602.

8U K

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0

100

200

300

53.9

54.7

72.3

81.4

92.4 12

5.1

149.

9

134.

1

174.

3

195.

8

202.

1

221.

7

239.

5

258.

0

275.

1GERMANY

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0.00

1000.00

2000.00

3000.00

1,16

3.7

1,20

2.5

1,15

6.0

1,35

3.4

1,22

7.6

1,23

4.0

1,28

9.6

1,68

3.4

2,14

0.7

1,99

9.6

1,99

6.5

2,14

2.0

2,30

0.6

2,44

7.6

2,62

9.7JAPAN

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

500

1000

1500

89.3

76.1 24

0.5

332.

0

378.

0

454.

1

310.

4

448.

9

573.

9

780.

3

726.

9

795.

9

846.

5

913.

1

990.

5BELGIUM

0200400600800

134.

2

142.

4

158.

1

156.

9

168.

0

212.

9 420.

6

55.3

521.

0

601.

8

496.

5

559.

4

625.

6

694.

7

759.

8ITALY

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

0100200

48.3

38.4

5.6

1.9

6.6

1.5 70

.2

47.8

63.0 14

1.2

89.7

110.

2

133.

5

152.

5

169.

7BANGLADESH

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

200

400

80.8 13

2.3

45.7

54.1

38.3

44.3

271.

9

198.

7

236.

6

256.

0

260.

3

295.

3

346.

2

383.

5

417.

8NETHERLAND

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

50

100

17.1

21.2

18.5

16.1

23.5

28.1

74.2

47.1

54.5

57.1 66.2

73.4

81.4

88.3

93.1SRI LANKA

2004200520062007 200820092010201120122013 201420152016201720180

50100150200250300

0.5

1.5

3.9

2.3

1.1

0.7 33

.5 81.0 10

8.3 18

2.9

137.

2

164.

5

193.

8

224.

7

254.

8SAUDI ARABIA

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

50100150200

11.3

17.4

11.6

2.3 29

.7

4.9 20

.4 55.3 87

.3 103.

4

86.5

101.

3

118.

5

135.

5

149.

7

INDONESIA

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180

50100150200

27.2 48

.2 73.3

60.3 93

.5

62.3 10

7.4

129.

8

118.

5

115.

0

139.

4

146.

7

155.

1

166.

9

174.

5

KOREA

FROZEN SHRIMP

FROZEN FISH FR CUTTLE FISH

FR SQUID DRIED ITEM LIVE ITEMS CHILLED ITEMS

OTHERS0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

9.23

% 18.1

7%

12.0

2%

13.9

6%

18.8

6%

14.5

0%

23.7

0%

14.9

3%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

5.56

%

9.12

%

7.88

%

5.39

%

10.6

3%

17.0

3%

6.03

% 13.7

7% 24.2

1%

16.1

9%

11.3

3%

12.2

3%

12.8

4%

79.3

9%

24.8

1%

15.5

2%

•India’s highest export performance increased to18841.20crores ( 19.06%) in 2013 on Total marine exports.

•Indian overall products and Marine products exported from our country. In the year 2004 Total exports of marine

products contri buted arround 2.08% on India’s Total export. but it was decreased to 0.84% in 2009 on Total

exports. but it over all reveals the contri but ion was above 1% on all the year of marine products

•In the year 2010 contribution of Marine products is arround 40.10% and in the year 2008 it was increased to -

13.43% due to lack of demands in foreign country. Overall it shows function in marine products

•Marine products export to FROZEN SHRIMP at the value was increasing into highest level 9706.36 croress (18.48%) in the year of 2013.

•Marine products export of FROZEN FISH at the was increasing into highest level 3296.86croress (18.22%). in the year of 2013

•Marine products export of FROZEN CUTTLE FISH at thewas Growing the highest export value in the year of 2013 is 1354.28croress (15.95%).

•Marine products export of FROZEN SQUID at thewas increasing into highest leve 1378.08 croress (18.94%) . in the year of 2013

•Marine products export of DRIED ITEM at thewas increasing into highest level 819.90 croress (17.90%). in the year of 2013

•Marine products export to LIVE ITEMS at thewas increasing into highest level 197.89 croress (19.22%). in the year of 2013.

•Marine products export of CHILLED ITEMS at the value was increasing into highest level 537.11 crores(25.78%). in the year of 2013

•Marine products export of OTHERS at the value was increasing into highest level 1565.78croress (17.57%). in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to JAPAN at the value was increasing into highest level 2140.67croress(14.81%). in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to USA was increasing into highest level 4026.48croress(22.04%). in the year of 2013

•Marine products export to CHINA was increasing into highest level 1977.81croress(16.27%). in the year of 2011

•Marine products export to U ARAB EMTS at the value was increasing into highest level 549.51croress (18.47%). in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to SINGAPORE at the value was increasing into highest level 256.01croress (18.57%). in the year of 2013

•Marine products export to U K at the value was increasing into highest level 499.8croress (13.88%). in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to GERMANY at the value was increasing into highest level 195.75croress (17.27%). in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to BELGIUM at the value was increasing into highest level 780croress (21.18%) in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to ITALY at the value was increasing into highest level 601croress. (23.41%) in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to BANGLADESH at the value was increasing into highest level (33.26%) 3779.80croress. in the year of 2013

•Marine products export to NETHERLAND at the value was increasing into highest level (18.85%) 256.03croress. in the year of 2009

•Marine products export to SRI LANKA at the value was increasing into highest level (15.97%) 57.08croress. in the year of 2013

•Marine products export to SAUDI ARAB at the value was increasing into highest level (43.99%) 182.9croress. in the year of 2013.

•Marine products export to INDONESIA at the was increasing into highest level (30.10%) 03.36croress. in the year of 2013

•Marine products export to KOREA at the value was increasing into highest level 118.53croress (13.77). in the year of 2013.

•Marine products export to HONG KONG at the value was increasing into highest level 755.06croress (24.11%). in the year of 2010

The marine board should take

necessary steps to improve its

foreign trade .Because the future

trend of the board’s export is in

partially decreasing trend.

The board has to produce some

more variety of marine products.

The board should adopt some

safety measures to avoid future

losses.

Multiple usages & multiple-

ownership;

Poor understanding of

requirements of users;

The government and the industry

has to clearly identify the problem

and evolve a common strategy

involving the government and the

industry with cluster as focus.

Unlike marine sector, inland

fisheries cannot claim a satisfactory

status with regard to data collection;

Preparation of policy papers and

issuing guidelines based on latest

information on zonal and regional

basis

Poor understanding of

requirements of users; Lack of

relevant and usable information;

It is good to give more incentives

to the employees; it will be helpful

for increasing the production

marine product.

To avoid fluction in growth rate

for seasonal,demand,production,

market condition, tax rate

problem ,preshipment problem

should be avoided by improving

storage facility

Establishment and adoption of

standardized or compatible data

compilation methodologies and

tools;

The marine products export fetches several crores of foreign country to our country and provides

employment opportunities to our people. The production of the marine products must be increased to

increase the exports into global level. So, our marine products can hike their share into global level in

future. By, improving the exports of the marine products, it will yield the benefit to improve our

economy. Based on the above study we can find that all the aspects related to this company’s products

show a positive growth steadily. If marine export promotion council follows the strategy and policy

suitable to its environment it can be able to secure a significant portion of the world market. The

growth of exporter lies in the technical advancements, and maintenance of good will to beat the

competitions, which is extruding now as well as in the future. This chapter explains the trend analysis

for export statistics from the year 2014-2018. This projected trend will help the further enhancement of

the company. Increasing and declining trend has been shown by different charts.