Upload
erika-marie-pace
View
178
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Erika M. PaceProf. Paola Aiello
Facing complexity of inclusive classrooms through reflection on
simplex principles17th International Conference on Education
18th May, 2015Athens, Greece
Department of Humanities, Philosophy and Education,
University of SalernoResearch Interests: Inclusive and Special Needs
Education, Teacher Education, Non-linear Trajectories in Didactics, Technology in Education
Motor Activity, The Role of the Body in Educational Research, Health and Wellbeing
Project OutlineResearch aim: To develop a resource to guide reflective processes during teacher education courses that will positively impact teacher efficacy to deal with the complexity characterising inclusive school settings.
Specific Objective: Create and pilot test the effectiveness of a specifically-designed professional development journal to be used during teacher education courses to guide reflective processes aimed at increasing teacher efficacy to work in inclusive contexts.
Project Outline
Core Project Phases: • Design and develop a professional
development journal to be used during a teacher training course;• Teacher efficacy will be measured prior
to and at the end of the course using the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) scale, a validated tool designed by Sharma, Loreman & Forlin (2011);
Project Outline
• Pilot test the resource during a teacher training course and gather feedback on journal use.
Rationale
3. Reflective practice – acknowledged as an essential competence for lifelong learning and continuous professional development;
4. The theory of simplexity: its application to didactics may provide a key to face complexity.
1. Complexity: in inclusive contexts, teaching-learning processes and inclusive teaching;
2. Teacher agency: depends on teacher efficacy, which is underpinned by personal, behavioural and environmental factors;
Complexity in 21st Century Classrooms
Fast social, cultural, economic and technological change leading to: obsolescence of knowledge and
skills (Michel, 2001) within knowledge-based economies (OECD, 1996);
an unpredictable environment in constant evolution (Putman, 2012; Sibilio, 2014).
Shift from dual track to single-track inclusive systems
Implications of Inclusive Education
A radical shift in attitudes and a willingness on the part of schools to transform practices: • in the curriculum on offer, • the assessment, • recording and reporting of pupils’
achievements, • the decisions that are taken on the
grouping of pupils within schools or classrooms, • pedagogy and classroom practice, • sport and leisure and recreational
opportunities (Mittler, 2000).
The Construct of Self-efficacy
SELF-EFFICACY: “what you believe you can do with what you have under a variety of circumstances” (Bandura, 1986 p. 37).
Individual’s overall perceptions
of his/her abilities - SELF-EFFICACY
Motivation to change
PersonalFactors
Behavioural Factors
Environmental Factors
Self-efficacy and Teacher Agency
Self-efficacy is an essential component within human agency, defined as the intentional completion of actions (Bandura, 1986), as it influences:• the choice of tasks, • the effort one puts into the application
of such tasks and • the persistence over time (Putman,
2012);
all fundamental elements when working within complex scenarios as are
inclusive classrooms and systems.
Self-efficacy and Teacher AgencyA strong predictor of various variables linked to effective inclusive education such as:• willingness and openness to
innovation (Berman, Mc Laughlin, Bass, Pauly & Zellman, 1977, Guskey, 1988, Stein & Wang, 1988); • persistence when faced with low-
performing students (Gibson & Dembo, 1984; Pajares, 1996);• lower inclination to refer a difficult
student to special education (Meijer & Foster, 1988; Podell & Sodak, 1993; Soodak & Podell, 1993); and • a higher likelihood to implement
effective methods of instruction (Ashton & Webb, 1986; Bandura, 1997).
Reflective Practice
“it is through the development of knowledge and
understanding of the practice setting and
the ability to recognize and respond to such knowledge that the
reflective practitioner becomes truly
responsive to the needs, issues, and
concerns that are so important in shaping practice” (Loughran,
2002, p.42).
The Theory of Simplexity – Alain Berthoz Based on simplifying principles, a
complex adaptive system finds solutions “to process complex situations
very rapidly, elegantly, and efficiently, taking past experience into account and anticipating the future” (Berthoz, 2012, p.3).
Simplexity complements complexity – it’s not an anytonym. Nor is it a synonym of simplicity. Simplexity is an ensemble of solutions that appeared in the course of evolution to allow living organisms to survive despite the complexity of natural processes.
Simplexity – 6 Characteristics or Properties
Specialisation and Modularityneeded for the breakdown of a complex task into various functions to facilitate better control of action
needed for the ability of decision making when anticipating and predicting consequences of actions, capitalising the results of past experiences and betting on the behaviour of others
Speed
Simplexity – 6 Characteristics or Properties
Reliabilityto reduce the margin of error to a minimum
the ability to select the right strategy from a repertoire of choices to resolve a problem, perceive, capture, decide, or act depending on the context
Flexibility, Vicariance and Adaptation to Change
Simplexity – 6 Characteristics or Properties
Memory
present action relies on this
characteristic to predict the future consequences of
an action
the ability to capitalize patterns of interactions in similar situations
Generalization
Six Simplex Principles as Tools for Life
1. Inhibition and the Principle of Refusal
•Enables competition, and consequently decision making, plasticity (flexibility), and stability. • It enhances speed to select from among the complex constituents that make up any phenomenon, act, or situation.• Selecting one action over another requires inhibiting all the actions one does not choose and disinhibit the one acted.
Six Simplex Principles as Tools for Life
2. The principle of specialisation and selection
•Every species scans the world only form cues important to its survival, creating one’s own umwelt (subjective universe).• It involves the selection of pertinent information needed to reach the goal of action. • It is induced during a stimulus-response process, but it is also intrinsic to adopting a perspective to project one’s intentions and hypothesise onto the world.
Six Simplex Principles as Tools for Life
3. The principle of Probabilistic Anticipation
• Prediction always involves probability, and to take action the brain has to make some hypotheses, deciding on what probability that hypothesis has of being correct on the basis of the information available in the present as well as taking the memory of past experiences into account. •Key to innovation thanks to its unique spatial and temporal organisation.
Six Simplex Principles as Tools for Life
4. The Detour principle•Essential to solve non linear problems.• Inextricably linked to creative thought and action. • Short-cuts should not be ignored, but systems need to ensure that taking the longer way is not faster.
Six Simplex Principles as Tools for Life
5. The principle of Cooperation and Redundancy•Redundancy refers to the duplication of components or function of a system with the intention to increase reliability of the system to make it fail-safe. •Cooperation refers to the process of combining the information available to ensure that the information is coherent and therefore mitigate the risk of error.
Six Simplex Principles as Tools for Life
6. The principle of Meaning• Since “simplex solutions are motivated by intentions, goals, or functions”, it implies affirming the principle of meaning whose foundations are in the act itself.
Erika M. [email protected]
Thank you