Upload
jamaica-olazo
View
1.103
Download
13
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING
Name of FS Student _________________________________________________________________________ Course ________________________________________________ Year & Section ______________________ Resource Teacher 1________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 2________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 3________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Cooperating School ____________________________________________________________
My Target While I observe three different classes, I will be able to identify applications of the
principles of assessment.
My Performance (How Will Be Rated)
Field Study 6, Episode 1- Guiding Principles in the Assessment of Learning Focused on: Application of the principles of assessment.
Tasks Exemplary 4
Superior 3
Satisfactory 2
Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation
All tasks were Done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectation
4
All or nearly all Tasks were done with high quality
3
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
2
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objective met but with poor quality
1
My Analysis Analysis questions were answered completely. In depth answers. - Thoroughly grounded on theories.
Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories.
Analysis question were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories.
Analysis question were not answered.
- Exemplary grammar and spelling.
4
Grammar and spelling are superior.
3
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
2
Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory.
1
My Reflection Reflection Statements are Thoughtful and Clear, supported By experiences From the episode
4
Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.
3
Reflection statements are shallow, supported by experiences from the episode.
2
Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode.
1
My Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
4
Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
3
Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking.
2
Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized and unclear.
1
Submission Before deadline
4
On the deadline
3
A day after the deadline
2
Two days or more after the deadline
1
Sub Totals
Over-all Score
Rating: (Based on Transmutation)
________________________________ ___________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name Date
Transmutation of Score to grade/rating Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 10 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81 8 - 19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78 17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75 16 - 1.75 - 90 8 - 9 - 3.5 - 72 and 15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below 14 - 2.25 - 84
USING APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Name of FS Student _________________________________________________________________________ Course ________________________________________________ Year & Section ______________________ Resource Teacher 1________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 2________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 3________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Cooperating School ____________________________________________________________
My Target In this episode, I must be able to identify assessment strategies/ activities used by at least
3 Resource Teachers.
My Performance (How Will Be Rated)
Field Study 6, Episode 2- Using Appropriate Assessment Tools Focused on: Identifying assessment strategies/activities.
Tasks Exemplary 4
Superior 3
Satisfactory 2
Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation
All tasks were Done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectation
4
All or nearly all Tasks were done with high quality
3
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
2
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objective met but with poor quality
1
My Analysis Analysis questions were answered completely. In depth answers. - Thoroughly grounded on theories.
Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories.
Analysis question were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories.
Analysis question were not answered.
- Exemplary grammar and spelling.
4
Grammar and spelling are superior.
3
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
2
Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory.
1
My Reflection Reflection Statements are Thoughtful and Clear, supported By experiences From the episode
4
Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.
3
Reflection statements are shallow, supported by experiences from the episode.
2
Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode.
1
My Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
4
Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
3
Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking.
2
Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized and unclear.
1
Submission Before deadline
4
On the deadline
3
A day after the deadline
2
Two days or more after the deadline
1
Sub Totals
Over-all Score
Rating: (Based on Transmutation)
________________________________ ___________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name Date
Transmutation of Score to grade/rating Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 10 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81 8 - 19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78 17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75 16 - 1.75 - 90 8 - 9 - 3.5 - 72 and 15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below 14 - 2.25 - 84
ON CONTENT VALIDITY OF TESTS
Name of FS Student _________________________________________________________________________ Course ________________________________________________ Year & Section ______________________ Resource Teacher 1________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 2________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 3________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Cooperating School ____________________________________________________________
My Target In Episode 3, I must be able to examine the content validity of a test/quiz given by at least
3 Resource Teachers, see the connection between Table of Specifications and test validity and construct test within content validity.
My Performance (How Will Be Rated)
Field Study 6, Episode 3 - Tests with Content Validity Focused on: Content validity of test/quiz, the connection between Table of Specifications and test validity and constructing test with content validity.
Tasks Exemplary 4
Superior 3
Satisfactory 2
Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation
All tasks were Done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectation
4
All or nearly all Tasks were done with high quality
3
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
2
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objective met but with poor quality
1
My Analysis Analysis questions were answered completely. In depth answers. - Thoroughly grounded on theories.
Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories.
Analysis question were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories.
Analysis question were not answered.
- Exemplary grammar and spelling.
4
Grammar and spelling are superior.
3
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
2
Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory.
1
My Reflection Reflection Statements are Thoughtful and Clear, supported By experiences From the episode
4
Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.
3
Reflection statements are shallow, supported by experiences from the episode.
2
Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode.
1
My Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
4
Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
3
Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking.
2
Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized and unclear.
1
Submission Before deadline
4
On the deadline
3
A day after the deadline
2
Two days or more after the deadline
1
Sub Totals
Over-all Score
Rating: (Based on Transmutation)
________________________________ ___________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name Date
Transmutation of Score to grade/rating Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 10 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81 8 - 19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78 17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75 16 - 1.75 - 90 8 - 9 - 3.5 - 72 and 15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below 14 - 2.25 - 84
ON SCORING RUBRICS
Name of FS Student _________________________________________________________________________ Course ________________________________________________ Year & Section ______________________ Resource Teacher 1________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 2________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 3________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Cooperating School ____________________________________________________________
My Target In this episode, I must be able to examine different types of scoring rubrics used by my
Resource Teachers and relate them to assessment of student learning.
My Performance (How Will Be Rated)
Field Study 6, Episode 4 – On Scoring Rubrics Focused on: Types of Scoring Rubrics
Tasks Exemplary 4
Superior 3
Satisfactory 2
Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation
All tasks were Done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectation
4
All or nearly all Tasks were done with high quality
3
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
2
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objective met but with poor quality
1
My Analysis Analysis questions were answered completely. In depth answers. - Thoroughly grounded on theories.
Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories.
Analysis question were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories.
Analysis question were not answered.
- Exemplary grammar and spelling.
4
Grammar and spelling are superior.
3
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
2
Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory.
1
My Reflection Reflection Statements are Thoughtful and Clear, supported By experiences From the episode
4
Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.
3
Reflection statements are shallow, supported by experiences from the episode.
2
Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode.
1
My Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
4
Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
3
Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking.
2
Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized and unclear.
1
Submission Before deadline
4
On the deadline
3
A day after the deadline
2
Two days or more after the deadline
1
Sub Totals
Over-all Score
Rating: (Based on Transmutation)
________________________________ ___________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name Date
Transmutation of Score to grade/rating Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 10 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81 8 - 19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78 17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75 16 - 1.75 - 90 8 - 9 - 3.5 - 72 and 15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below 14 - 2.25 - 84
ON PORTFOLIOS
Name of FS Student _________________________________________________________________________ Course ________________________________________________ Year & Section ______________________ Resource Teacher 1________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 2________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Cooperating School ____________________________________________________________
My Target In this episode, I am able to see and examine various types of learners’ portfolios that my
Resource Teachers used for assessing learners’ performance.
My Performance (How Will Be Rated)
Field Study 6, Episode 5 – On Portfolios Focused on: Types of learners’ portfolios.
Tasks Exemplary 4
Superior 3
Satisfactory 2
Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation
All tasks were Done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectation
4
All or nearly all Tasks were done with high quality
3
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
2
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objective met but with poor quality
1
My Analysis Analysis questions were answered completely. In depth answers. - Thoroughly grounded on theories.
Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories.
Analysis question were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories.
Analysis question were not answered.
- Exemplary grammar and spelling.
4
Grammar and spelling are superior.
3
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
2
Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory.
1
My Reflection Reflection Statements are Thoughtful and Clear, supported By experiences From the episode
4
Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.
3
Reflection statements are shallow, supported by experiences from the episode.
2
Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode.
1
My Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
4
Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
3
Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking.
2
Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized and unclear.
1
Submission Before deadline
4
On the deadline
3
A day after the deadline
2
Two days or more after the deadline
1
Sub Totals
Over-all Score
Rating: (Based on Transmutation)
________________________________ ___________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name Date
Transmutation of Score to grade/rating Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 10 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81 8 - 19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78 17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75 16 - 1.75 - 90 8 - 9 - 3.5 - 72 and 15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below 14 - 2.25 - 84
SCORING, GRADING AND COMMUNICATING RESULTS
Name of FS Student _________________________________________________________________________ Course ________________________________________________ Year & Section ______________________ Resource Teacher 1________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 2________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Resource Teacher 3________________________________ Signature _____________ Date ____________ Cooperating School ____________________________________________________________
My Target In this Episode, I will have “hands-on” experience in scoring test items and computing
grade and I will observe classroom proceedings during the card-getting day.
My Performance (How Will Be Rated)
Field Study 6, Episode 6 – Scoring, Grading and Communicating Results Focused on: Scoring test items, computing grades and communicating results to parents.
Tasks Exemplary 4
Superior 3
Satisfactory 2
Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation
All tasks were Done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectation
4
All or nearly all Tasks were done with high quality
3
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
2
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objective met but with poor quality
1
My Analysis Analysis questions were answered completely. In depth answers. - Thoroughly grounded on theories.
Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories.
Analysis question were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories.
Analysis question were not answered.
- Exemplary grammar and spelling.
4
Grammar and spelling are superior.
3
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
2
Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory.
1
My Reflection Reflection Statements are Thoughtful and Clear, supported By experiences From the episode
4
Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.
3
Reflection statements are shallow, supported by experiences from the episode.
2
Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode.
1
My Portfolio Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
4
Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
3
Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking.
2
Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized and unclear.
1
Submission Before deadline
4
On the deadline
3
A day after the deadline
2
Two days or more after the deadline
1
Sub Totals
Over-all Score
Rating: (Based on Transmutation)
________________________________ ___________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name Date
Transmutation of Score to grade/rating Score Grade Score Grade
20 - 10 - 99 12-13 - 2.50 - 81 8 - 19 - 1.25 - 96 11 - 2.75 - 78 17 - 1.5 - 93 10 - 3.00 - 75 16 - 1.75 - 90 8 - 9 - 3.5 - 72 and 15 - 2.00 - 87 7-below - 5.00 - below 14 - 2.25 - 84