15
THE EFFECT OF FACEBOOK & LORE ON STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT ACADEMIC EMOTIONS & PERFORMANCE AN EDL@B EXPERIMENT Gaby Lutgens & Gwen Noteborn Maastricht University Library, dep. Education & Research Support 20 november 2013 Online Information Conference Publication of these slides only with explicit consent of the author

Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

THE EFFECT OF FACEBOOK & LORE ON STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT ACADEMIC EMOTIONS & PERFORMANCE

AN EDL@B EXPERIMENT

Gaby Lutgens & Gwen Noteborn

Maastricht University Library, dep. Education & Research Support

20 november 2013

Online Information Conference

Publication of these slides only with explicit consent of the author

Page 2: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

What is the EdL@b?

An educational laboratory for teachers, educators, students and companies.

2

Page 3: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

Who is Ed?

3

Page 6: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

Events to share experiences and ideas

• Inspiration sessions

• Special events

6

Page 7: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

Zooming on one specific experiment…

7

Page 8: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

8 8

Teachers use Blackboard mainly as a one-way

device; offering lots of information on the course

and documentation like literature, but students

do not feel invited to start interaction within this

environment: they tend to go ‘outside’ and make

their own Facebook pages and shared

Dropboxes.

“Standard ELO does not

offer enough tools to

interact”

Page 9: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

9 9

Yes!

Students like the possibility to interact outside the

official ELO and have the opportunity to add

links, attachments and pictures. Even the picture

next to the post has its effect (on social presence

and bonding). The teacher is welcome to

participate, but it feels like ‘their’ environment.

“Lore and Facebook fulfill

students need to

communicate with their

peers on course topics”

Page 10: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

10

Not true… Lore is created according to Facebook

(simple, intuitive interface where you can perform

all you want), but with ‘walls’ so no invited persons

can enter, copy right issues are taken care of and

you can more easily make a clear distinction

between private and professional

communication (posts do

not show up on your

personal FB-page).

“There are no

differences between

Lore and Facebook”

Page 11: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

11

The role of the teacher is important here!

Make what you want the students to do well structured,

e.g. around a project or clear assignment(s).

• have the students take up roles and give them responsibility

• not too much freedom

• and provoke the students to be critical and share ideas and

opinions.

“Can we increase

meaningful usage of tools

like Facebook or Lore?”

Page 12: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

12 12

Does the platform increase engagement?

Teachers willing to experiment already

created an atmosphere making students

more willing to participate

and engage.

Did the platform increase student satisfaction?

Having the teacher dedicate to increase

engagement (aiming for more attractive

education), made the appreciation of the

course higher.

“Did the tools have impact on behavior?

Or in other words: did they lead to other

learning and teaching activities?”

Page 13: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

“So, what did we find out?”

• Make use of what is appreciated to create engagement (notifications, personalization, pictures) and make participation worthwhile

• Lesser then more platforms; if necessary stick to what you must use and organise it from there

• The higher the appreciation, the more engagement and (not surprisingly) higher grades

Page 14: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

Questions? Who wants to make ‘my’ picture?

and send it to [email protected]

Thank you!

Page 15: Gaby Lutgens Edl@b experiment

15

www.edlab.nl