31
Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism Assoc. Prof. Axel Bruns Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia [email protected] http://snurb.info/ @ snurb_dot_info http://mappingonlinepublics.net/

Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Guest lecture presented at the University of Helsinki, 11 Oct. 2012.

Citation preview

Page 1: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Assoc. Prof. Axel Bruns

Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

[email protected] – http://snurb.info/ – @snurb_dot_info

http://mappingonlinepublics.net/

Page 2: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

(Image by falling.bullets)

Page 3: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Challenges for the Journalism Industry

• Gatekeeping:– Multiplication of available information channels– Declining control over information flows– Potential for bypassing journalism altogether

• Gatewatching:– Increasingly active, selective audiences– Citizen journalism alternatives to mainstream media– Direct communication between news makers and news users

• Real-time media:– Acceleration of news processes beyond 24-hour news cycle– Constant circulation of news and rumours through social media– Always-on ‘ambient news’ channels (Hermida, 2010; Burns, 2010)

Page 4: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Producing the News

• Traditional news process:

(from Bruns, Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production, 2005)

Page 5: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

The End of Gatekeeping

• Gatekeeping depends on:– Scarcity of information:

information difficult to access for average citizens– Scarcity of channels:

need for careful selection of what news is ‘fit to print’– Scarcity of qualified professionals:

specific skillset required for journalism, training necessary

• The end of scarcity:– Information abundance:

digitisation of information leads to greater accessibility– Channel abundance:

institutions and organisations provide first-hand information online– Proliferation of expertise:

domain experts and ‘professional amateurs’ share their knowledge

Page 6: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism
Page 7: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

An Industry in Denial?

• The Australian erupts:– sheltered academics and failed journalists who would not get a job on a

real newspaper– we understand Newspoll because we own it (12 July 2007)– statistical bloggers forever complain … and essentially want polls to be

banished from newspapers and public debate except during an election (21 February 2008)

• No more than amateurs?– Dan Gillmor: “my readers know more than I do” (2003)– professional journalists vs. amateur journalists, but also– professional psephologists vs. (very) amateur poll interpreters

Science (psephology) beats craft (journalism)

Page 8: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Produsing the News

• Gatewatcher news process:

(from Bruns, Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production, 2005)

• Variations on the process are possible

Page 9: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Implications of Gatewatching

• Potential new roles for ‘open news’:– ‘bottom-up’ instead of ‘top-down’ reporting– multiperspectival news coverage (Herbert Gans)– democratic, dialogic, deliberative journalism

(Dan Gillmor: ‘from lecture to conversation’)

• Implications for mainstream journalism:– journalists and editors can be bypassed– corrective and critical observer of mainstream news

(Herbert Gans: a ‘second tier’ of news organisations)– removal of clear distinctions between producers and consumers

Page 10: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Open News and Open Source

• Translating the open source definition to ‘open news’:

The basic idea behind open source is very simple: When programmers can read, redistribute, and modify the source code for a piece of software, the Software evolves. People improve it, people adapt it, people fix bugs. And this can happen at a speed that, if one is used to the slow pace of conventional software development, seems astonishing.

We in the open source community have learned that this rapid evolutionary process produces better software than the traditional closed model, in which only a very few programmers can see the source and everybody else must blindly use an opaque block of bits.

(Opensource.org)

Page 11: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

• Decline of the traditional production value chain:

Producer Distributor Consumer

(market research producer distributor consumer)

(consumer input producer distributor consumer)

Beyond ‘Production’

Page 12: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

A New Value Chain?

(as user)

produser

(as producer)

Content Content

Page 13: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

(http://www.research.ibm.com/visual/projects/history_flow/capitalism1.htm)

Page 14: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism
Page 15: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Common Characteristics

• shared across these environments:– Open Participation, Communal Evaluation – the community as a

whole, if sufficiently large and varied, can contribute more than a closed team of producers, however qualified

– Fluid Heterarchy, Ad Hoc Governance – produsers participate as is appropriate to their personal skills, interests, and knowledges; this changes as the produsage project proceeds

– Unfinished Artefacts, Continuing Process – content artefacts in produsage projects are continually under development, and therefore always unfinished; their development follows evolutionary, iterative, palimpsestic paths

– Common Property, Individual Merit – contributors permit (non-commercial) community use and adaptation of their intellectual property, and are rewarded by the status capital gained through this process

Page 16: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism
Page 17: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Social Media and Real-Time News

• Key news-related uses of social media:– First-hand news reports:

• Hudson River emergency landing; Abbottabad raid; crises and disasters

– Continuing news discussion:• Information sharing, commentary, story curation

– ‘Ambient’ news coverage (Hermida; Burns):• Early indicator of breaking stories; trending topics, themes, URLs, etc.

• Ad hoc formation of online communities:– Drawing on available tools and platforms– Driven by current themes and problems– Quasi-journalistic research and commentary– User-driven data journalism

Page 18: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Twitter and the Japanese Tsunami

Page 19: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

‘Working the Story’ through Social Media

• Journalism as a distributed effort:– Large number of contributors performing ‘random acts of journalism’– Network of ‘sleeper sources’, on the scene well before journalists– Collaborative curation of stories, ad hoc but self-organising– Journalists and news organisations participating as equals with users

• Journalism in the open:– Information sourcing, sharing, verification, curation as it happens– Separate, uncontrolled, third-party spaces for ambient journalism– Sharing of individual news items, disembedded from the brand– No scoops, no embargoed knowledge, no controlled releases

• Journalism as a participatory sport:– “the news may be too important to leave to the journalists alone”

(Gans, 1980)

Page 20: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

#spill: 23 June 2010, 6-7 p.m.

http://mappingonlinepublics.net/2010/12/30/visualising-twitter-dynamics-in-gephi-part-2/

Page 21: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

#spill: 23 June 2010, 7-8 p.m.

Page 22: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

#spill: 23 June 2010, 8-9 p.m.

Page 23: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Image by Yea I Knit

Page 24: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

#eqnz: @replies + Manual Retweets

mainstream news

authorities

utilities

Page 25: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Ha

sh

tag

Me

trics

(Bruns & Stieglitz, forthcoming)

Page 26: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism
Page 27: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Challenges for Journalism

• No more information monopolies– Gatekeeping has become impossible– Gatewatching creates new competitors– Self-righteousness is inappropriate

• Active, productive users– Clear distinctions between amateurs and professionals have disappeared– Journalists are often amateurs in relation to the themes they cover– Collaborative produsage can lead to professional quality

• Ambient information environments– Declining product loyalty in complex media environments– Information subscriptions information search ‘information will find me’– Subscription models (e.g. iPad apps) only successful in special cases

Page 28: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Opportunities for Journalism

• Engaging with active news users:– Specialisation:

• Personal and organisational specialisation• Individual journalists as personal brands

– Curation:• Journalists and news organisations as expert news curators• Provision of advanced news crowdsourcing platforms

– Facilitation:• Focus on journalistic core business: research, investigation• Partnership with users as critics, commentators, and curators

Page 29: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Produsage and the News Industry

• Engaging with social media communities:1. Be open.

For users (access) and with users (transparency).

2. Seed community processes by providing content and tools.

Model desired behaviour, assist productive participation.

3. Support community dynamics and devolve responsibilities.

Engage promising community leaders as they emerge.

4. Don’t exploit the community and its work.

Making money is fine, but you don’t own your users.

Adapted from Axel Bruns and Mark Bahnisch. "Social Drivers behind Growing Consumer Participation in User-Led Content Generation: Volume 1 - State of the Art." Sydney: Smart Services CRC, 2009.

Page 31: Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism

Viral Marketing

Axel Bruns

Associate Professor

ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation

Queensland University of Technology

Brisbane, Australia

[email protected]

@snurb_dot_info

http://snurb.info/

http://produsage.org/

http://mappingonlinepublics.net/

Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond:From Production to Produsage (Peter Lang, 2008)

Uses of Blogs, eds. Axel Bruns and Joanne Jacobs (Peter Lang, 2006)

Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production (Peter Lang, 2005)