9
Group Dynamics related to sport performance II Sports Psychology A2

Group dynamics II

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Group dynamics II

Group Dynamics related to sport performance II

Sports Psychology A2

Page 2: Group dynamics II

Group coordination and cooperationAnswer on a separate sheet of paper.

3 minutesTASK 1: How can lack of cooperation within a

sports team lead to problems with team coordination? Provide a sporting example to illustrate your answer.

Think about...What is cooperation?How does it help or hinder in a sporting situation?

Page 3: Group dynamics II

Topic aims:By the end of this topic you should be able to:1.Describe the nature of a group/team (mutual

awareness, interaction, common goal).2.Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of

Steiner’s model of group performance (awareness of problems associated with productivity of a group/team).

3.Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of motivational factors(social loafing); coordination/cooperation factors (Ringelmann effect) and explain the negative influences on behaviour that cause dysfunctional behaviour and avoidance of an active and healthy lifestyle.

4.Explain the factors affecting the formation and development of a cohesive group/team.

FIRST WE NEED TO SORT THE ROOM OUT

Page 4: Group dynamics II

The Ringelmann Effect

As group size increases there may be a decline of

individual effort and eventual productivity. This

phenomenon was first noted by Ringelmann. (The Ringelmann Effect)

Page 5: Group dynamics II

The Ringelmann effectRingelmann observed a ‘tug – of war’ competition

during the nineteenth century; watching events that included two to eight competitors. The main points to remember are that he found:

As the groups got bigger individual effort decreased.Instead of eight men pulling eight times as hard as

one, the group averaged pulling four times as hard as one man.

Therefore he found an inverse (opposing) relationship between the number of people performing the task and the amount of effort put in by each of them.

Later research by Ingham et al linked this relationship to a decrease in motivation rather than its initial link by Ringelmann to lack of coordination.

Page 6: Group dynamics II

Ringelmann and Steiner...LINK

TASK 5: Use your knowledge and understanding of Steiner’s model of productivity and the Ringelmann effect to write a short paragraph which links the two pieces of research; drawing

the concept of social loafing.

Think about:Where the two theories crossover?What is social loafing?How can you combine them in an explanation

which leads to you to social loafing.

Page 7: Group dynamics II

Ringelmann and Steiner...LINK

Steiner suggested that lack of actual productivity is a result of faulty group processes; which he categorised in to two aspects: Coordination losses and Motivational losses. Ringelmann’s research has shown that actual performance decreases with an increase in group size due to lack of individual effort; Ingham later suggested that this was due to the motivational losses that Steiner’s identified in his model of productivity. This loss in actual group productivity (performance) is more likely due to reduced motivation (rather than Ringelmanns suggestion of low coordination) has been termed Social Loafing.

Page 8: Group dynamics II

Social LoafingSocial Loafing: An individual who attempts to ‘hide’

when placed in group situations and fails to perform to their potential.

Research in to explaining social loafing by Latane, Harkins and Williams (1979) proposed that performers demonstrated both allocation strategies and minimising strategies.

Allocation Strategies: performers are motivated to work hard in groups but save their best for when they are performing alone or under close scrutiny when it personally benefits them more.

Minimising Strategies: performers are motivated to give as much or as little (minimum) effort in order to ‘get by’ and achieve the task.

Page 9: Group dynamics II

Homework: Next Thursday

1.Describe a situation from sport that provides opportunities for performers to ‘loaf’.

2.Using this example; explain possible reasons why performers may choose to ‘loaf’.

3.Using the sporting example you have given. Identify four strategies that a coach/teacher could use to minimise the impact of social loafing and the Ringelmann effect.

4.If the coach/teacher did not attempt to reduce social loafing and the Ringelmann effect; what impact might this have on performers sustaining a healthy and active lifestyle?