21
Institutio Communicationis Borislav Gueorguiev South-East European Center for Semiotic Studies, New Bulgarian University https://bogeo.net EFSS 2016

Institution of communication

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Institution of communication

Institutio Communicationis

Borislav GueorguievSouth-East European Center for Semiotic

Studies,New Bulgarian University

https://bogeo.net

EFSS2016

Page 2: Institution of communication

Institutio OratoriaQuintilian

EFSS2016

Page 3: Institution of communication

Contents

1. What is communication?2. What is institution?3. What does anthropological approach mean?

EFSS2016

Page 4: Institution of communication

Communication

DefinitionÉtablissement de relations codées entre un locuteur et un récepteur, à condition que le récepteur puisse devenir à son tour locuteur.

B.Toussaint,Qu’est-ce que la Sémiologie?, Privat, 1978.

Parler c’est communiquer

EFSS2016

Page 5: Institution of communication

Communication sciences

Établissement de relations codées entre un locuteur et un récepteur, à condition que le récepteur puisse devenir à son tour locuteur. Linguistics (and Semiotics) Psychology Anthropology

EFSS2016

Page 6: Institution of communication

Anthropological approach

Anthropology deals with the mankind, embed in communities and in the society.

Anthropology studies the common (unwritten) laws for co-existence and survival in the community and society, i.e. the common laws of the institution.

EFSS2016

Page 7: Institution of communication

InstitutionBronislaw Kasper Malinowski

Keywords describing one institution :

1. Law2. People3. Norms4. Tools5. Activities6. Functions

EFSS2016

Page 8: Institution of communication

Is the communication an institution?

Arrangement by Malinowski:1. Law2. People3. Norms4. Tools5. Activities6. Functions

Arrangements of proofs:

1. People2. Tools3. Activities4. Functions5. Norms6. Law

EFSS2016

Page 9: Institution of communication

Tools

Sign systems, based on seven strategic types of communication

EFSS2016

Page 10: Institution of communication

Strategic types of communication for

humans1. Touch: hot/cold; soft/hard; 2. Smell: pleasant/unpleasant; soft/hard;3. Taste: raw (le cru)/cooked (le cuit) – Claude Lévi-Strauss;

pleasant/unpleasant; soft/hard;4. Hearing: loud/quiet; articulate/non-articulate5. Sight: clear/cloudy; articulate/non-articulate6. Oral: loud/quiet; articulate/non-articulate;

instantaneousness/continuity7. Written: clear/cloudy; articulate/non-articulate;

instantaneousness/continuity

EFSS2016

Page 11: Institution of communication

Activities

Any possible speech act (Austin) and/or language game (Sprachspiel, Wittgenstein) which can be performed, and which is performed in different manner in different cultures (Anna Wierzbicka).

EFSS2016

Page 12: Institution of communication

J. L. Austin (1911 - 1960)

A British philosopher of language Widely associated with the concept

of the speech act and the idea is itself a form of action By uttering X, I am doing X

How to Do Things With Words, Oxford: Clarendon, 1962 – written version of Austin’s William James Lectures delivered in Harvard in 1955

EFSS2016

Page 13: Institution of communication

Strategic functions

1.Socialization through exchange;2.Pleasure;3.Healing / Therapy.

EFSS2016

Page 14: Institution of communication

Socialization

The language is the tool, which transforms our personal experience in external and social.

Berthrand Russel

EFSS2016

Page 15: Institution of communication

What do we exchange?

Claude Lévi-Strauss1. Women (or conjugal/sexual

partners);2. Goods & services;3. Ideas (i.e. information).

EFSS2016

Page 16: Institution of communication

Norms

Human beings do not live in the objective world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection.

Edward Sapir

EFSS2016

Page 17: Institution of communication

Norms

The fact of the matter is that the 'real world' is to a large extent unconsciously built upon the language habits of the group. No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same world with different labels attached... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation.

Edward Sapir

EFSS2016

Page 18: Institution of communication

Law

The common (unwritten) laws of communication from semiotic point of view are equivalent to the pragmatic principles of communication.

EFSS2016

Page 19: Institution of communication

Pragmatic Principles

1. The Principle of power (The Principle of commitativity);

2. Co-Operative principle;3. Politeness principle;4. Irony principle;5. Other principles;

EFSS2016

Page 20: Institution of communication

Thank [email protected]

EFSS2016

Page 21: Institution of communication

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8jCV4f7HVE

19.10.09