12
Co-funded by the Community programme eContentplus European Network of Best Practices for Interoperability of Spatial Planning Information

Krakow2010

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The ideas about spatial planning metadata profile of Plan4all project

Citation preview

Page 1: Krakow2010

Co-funded by the Community programmeeContentplus

European Network of BestPractices for Interoperabilityof Spatial Planning Information

Page 2: Krakow2010

WP 3

1. Analysis of requirements given by national legislation

2. Plan4all metadata profile design

Page 3: Krakow2010

WP 3 Metadata profile

Profiles1. Spatial plan metadata

2. Web services metadata

3. Spatial Data Theme metadata (dataset level) - WP4

4. Spatial Data Theme metadata (feature level) - WP4

Use of metadata Discovery (CSW) Documentation (dataset)

Discovery

Evaluation

Use

Page 4: Krakow2010

Spatial plan structure

Map 1Map 1

Textdocument

Textdocument

Map 2Map 2 Map 3Map 3

Textdocument

Textdocument

Textdocument

Textdocument

Spatial Plan Structure

Layer Layer Layer Layer

Page 5: Krakow2010

Profile: ISO 19115 / 19119 subset INSPIRE compliant Some extra queryables

SP metadata available during SP design process Documentation of SP adoption legislative steps

Requirements

Page 6: Krakow2010

SP Metadata componets

Spatial plan metadata (M)Spatial plan metadata (M)

Dataset MetadataDataset

Metadata

Application schema

Application schemaDataset

MetadataDataset

MetadataDataset

MetadataDataset

Metadata

parentIdentifier

softwareDevelopmentFile uri

Page 7: Krakow2010

Plan4all specific

1. SP Level (national / regional / local / sublocal): hierarchyLevelName

2. Organization roles (mapped to ISO codes)

3. Keywords – from Plan4all glossary

4. Application schema – link to external file

5. Text documents – distributionInfo//linkage

6. Multilingual metadata

Page 8: Krakow2010

Steps

Preparation phasePreparation phase In forceIn force

9.

Co

min

g i

nto

fo

rce

11

. E

xp

ira

tio

n

1. W

ork

star

t –

proc

ure

men

t ap

pro

val

10. R

epor

t on

pla

n's

appl

icat

ion

app

rova

l

4. C

once

pt

draf

t –

star

tin

g th

e di

scus

sion

3. S

pec

ifica

tion

- a

ppr

oval

2. S

pec

ifica

tion

– s

tart

ing

the

dis

cuss

ion

6. B

efor

e ap

pro

val -

sta

rtin

g th

e d

iscu

ssio

n

5. I

nst

ruct

ions

for

pre

par

atio

ns -

app

rova

l

7. B

efor

e ap

pro

val-

op

inio

n o

f a

reg

i. off

ice

8.

Be

fore

ap

pro

va

l -

iss

ue

10. R

epor

t on

pla

n's

appl

icat

ion

app

rova

l

Mapping: •lineage/*/processStep (preparation phase, revisions, …)•extent/*/temporalElement (in force) 9 - 11•citation/*/date (publication) - 8

Page 9: Krakow2010

Steps

MS specific

Page 10: Krakow2010

Source

Page 11: Krakow2010

Lineage

Plan 3

Plan 1Plan 2

Feature N

Generalized INSPIRE Theme

Feature level metadataInherited ?Links ?

metadata metadata

metadata

Page 12: Krakow2010

Recommendations for INSPIRE

1. Add status property to each INSPIRE theme ! gmd:MD_ProgressCode ? (planned,completed,obsolete,…) Own mapping? exiting / planned , true / false …

2. Add lineage metadata to each INSPIRE theme !