39
Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 & Mobility in Schools Empowering K-12 school district technology leaders to use technology strategically to improve teaching and learning. ISTE Annual Conference Philadelphia, PA June 27, 2011

Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation given by Keith Krueger and Lucy Gray at the International Society of Educational Technology Conference on behalf of the Consortium for School Networking

Citation preview

Page 1: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 & Mobility in

SchoolsEmpowering K-12 school district technology leaders to use technology strategically to improve teaching and learning.

ISTE Annual ConferencePhiladelphia, PA

June 27, 2011

Page 2: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

About CoSNMission

Serving K-12 technology leaders who through their strategic use of technology, improve teaching and learning.

Core ValueThe primary challenge we face in using technology effectively is human, not technical.

Audience

Chief Technology Officers (CTOs)/Chief Information Officers (CIOs)/Technology Directors

For that reason, CoSN focuses on Leadership and Policy.

2

Page 3: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Reimagine Learning

Young People’s Use of

Technology

Emerging Technologies

Tools

School Districts &

Technology

Page 4: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

State of Today

Technology, Mobile Devices and Web 2.0 tools have pervasive presence in the lives of young people.

Page 5: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Young People’s Use of Technology

Media use in a typical day for 8 – to 18- year-olds

Medium Time (hours)

TV content 4:29

Music/audio 2:31

Cell Phone (talking & txt) 2:08

Computer 1:29

Video Game 1:13

Print :38

Movies :25

Total Media Exposure w/ Multitasking 7:38

Page 6: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Young People’s Use of Technology

Media Equipment Percentage

TV 99%

Computer 93%

Video game console 87%

Ipod/MP3 player 76%

Cell phone 75%

Handheld video game player 59%

Laptop 29%

Media ownership for 8 – to 18- year-olds

Page 7: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Young People’s Use of Technology

Activity Percentage of Teens

Social Networking Services 73%

Search for news-current events and politics 62%

Share content 38%

Search for health information 31%

Remix 21%

Blogging 14%

Virtual worlds 8%

Tweet 8%

Online Activity for Teens

Page 8: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?
Page 9: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

One Year or Less– Cloud Computing– Mobiles

Emerging Technologies

Two to Three Years– Game-Based Learning– Open Content

Four to Five Years– Learning Analytics– Personalized Learning

Environments

Page 10: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Considerations for Considerations for Educational Leaders Educational Leaders

•How are schools and their leaders reacting to Web 2.0 and Mobility?•Do we have the leadership, vision and policies in place to effectively leverage these trends to reimagine learning?

Page 11: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

The nation’s district administrators are overwhelming positive about the impact of Web 2.0 & Mobile Devices on students’ lives and their education.

School Districts &

Technology

Page 12: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Web 2.0 & Mobile Devices in Schools

Over 75% of superintendents and curriculum directors agree Web 2.0 holds potential value for teaching and learning.

More positive about the potential of Web 2.0 for high schools and middle schools rather than elementary schools.

56% reported that Web 2.0 applications have not yet been integrated within the curriculum.

Teachers and administrators voice strong support for the potential benefits of mobile devices within instruction.

Page 13: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Mobile Devices & Web 2.0 toolsKeep students interested and

engaged in school.

School Districts &

Technology

Page 14: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Educational Innovation + Increase Access+ Budgetary Concerns+ Open Attitude=

BYOD

School Districts &

Technology

Page 15: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Leader Views Value of Web 2.0 & Mobile Learning

1. Keep students interested and engaged in school 2. Meet the needs of different kinds of learners 3. Develop students capabilities not possible through

traditional methods 4. Provide alternative learning environments for students5. Extend learning beyond the school day

Page 16: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

ProtectConcern on how to

protect children from harmful content on the Web. Preserve

Involves integrating Web 2.0 applications with the curriculum and pedagogy.

ProgressSchools need to change in order to become compatible with a changed world.

Web 2.0 Tools in the Classroom

Page 17: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Protect?

The majority of district administrators believe that student use of Web 2.0 should be limited to participation on approved educational websites.

School Districts &

Technology

Page 18: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Protect? Access

n=3228 Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Technology Directors.

District administrators with specific positions on access to Web 2.0 in schools

Page 19: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Protect? Filtering

Nearly every school district in the U.S. has an Internet filtering system. 55% are more restrictive than the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) requires.

Effectiveness of Filtering – 8% say virtually 100% effectively– 67% say filtering is very effective, but things

slip through– 13% say the best we can find, but students

find ways around it– 12% filtering system is too strict it often

impedes instruction

School Districts &

Technology

Page 20: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Protect?District administrators classified these problems as moderate to severe

Concern Percentage

Wasting time/distraction 75%

Making inappropriate contacts with strangers 27%

Use of non-authoritative or biased sources 56%

Inappropriate or rude online social interactions 54%

Accessing inappropriate materials 53%

Students giving out personal information 53%

Posting inappropriate pictures or media 48%

Cheating/plagiarism 48%

Cyber bullying 45%

Using technology to cheat in other ways 43%

Inappropriate entries/use 41%

Page 21: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Preserve?

The majority of school districts allow prescribed educational use for most of the other Web 2.0 tools.

Page 22: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Percentage of technology directors reporting on Web 2.0 use allowed in their districts

n= 907 Technology Directors.

Preserve?

Page 23: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Progress? Disruptive Change

Puts the organization in new path and transforms it.

Disruptive change represents a break with the way an organization structures policies, practices, roles and rules.

Page 24: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Preserve?

The use of these tools in American classrooms remains the province of individual pioneering classrooms.

Page 25: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Progress?Web 2.0 applications used in teaching materials, adopted by the district,or specifically included in the district's formal curriculum.

Page 26: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

What Stands in the Way?

School districts are more focused on dealing with the problems of Web 2.0 than on challenges to leverage Web 2.0 for learning.

Many district administrators said that educators in their districts were not sufficiently familiar with Web 2.0 to understand it fully, much less ready to redesign schooling.

Page 27: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

What Stands in the Way? • Broadband

• Hardware

• Filtering

• Mobile Devices

• Parental/Citizen Concerns

• Organizational/ Professional Development

• District – Level Leadership

• District Policies

Page 28: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Participatory Learning in Schools: Policy and Leadership Initiative

Tools

Page 29: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Participatory Culture: Building Blocks for School Leaders

Administrator’s Guide to Collaborative Tools in K–12 EducationGoal

Help school administrators foster participatory learning and support system changes in the school culture through the use of digital media.

Page 30: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Participatory Culture: Building Blocks for School Leaders

Leading with Web 2.0

Page 31: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Participatory Culture: Building Blocks for School Leaders

Learning with Web 2.0

Page 32: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Participatory Culture: Building Blocks for School Leaders

Transformative Leadership with Web 2.0

Page 33: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Tools

Page 34: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Tips for Building Blocks

• Understand the educational potential of Web 2.0

• Improve personal productivity with Web 2.0 tools

• Understand role of leaders (supt’s, curriculum and technology)

• Use Web 2.0 to transform teaching and learning

Page 35: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

CoSN, Leadership for Web 2.0 in Education: Promise and Reality, 2009

CoSN , Leadership for Mobile Learning, www.cosn.org/MobileLead

CoSN, Participatory Culture: Building Blocks for School Leaders, 2010 www.cosn.org/buildingblocks

Department of Education, National Education Technology Plan, Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology, 2010

Kaiser Family Foundation, Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds, 2010

Project Tomorrow, Speak Up 2010, National Findings, April 2011

Sources

Page 36: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Reimagine Learning: Leading in a Time of Constant Change 

March 5-7, 2012Washington, DC 

Call for Presentations 2012Deadline for Presentation Submission  

July 8, 2011, 6pm (ET) To Start your Presentation Proposal go to:

www.cosn.org/CFP 

Page 37: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Leadership for Mobile Leadership for Mobile LearningLearning

An interactive web site Tools and resources for planning mobile programsNews updatesCase studies of exemplary mobile programsVideo interviewsSpeaker bureau materials

Page 38: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Leadership for Mobile Leadership for Mobile LearningLearning

• Highlight leadership, research, and best practices for using mobile learning devices as an effective tool in teaching and learning

• Identify district policies that hinder the effective deployment of mobile learning devices

• Develop strategies and tools for the successful deployment of mobile learning technologies in school districts

Page 39: Leadership for Rethinking Web 2.0 and Mobility in Education: Protect? Preserve? Progress?

Keith Krueger, CEO, [email protected]

Lucy Gray , Project Director, [email protected]