Upload
dr-ajay-kumar-singh
View
3.402
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
•Ajay Kumar Singh•Neha Sinha•Department of Ophthalmology•King George‘s Medical University, Lucknow (INDIA)
INTRODUCTION
Stem cells-- Undifferentiated proliferating cells- Present in all self-renewing tissues- 0.5%-10% of total cell population
- Properties:- Long lived, long cell cycle time- have increased potential for error free proliferation with poor
differentiation- capability to divide in asymmetric manner
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
1971- Davanger and Evensen found the limbus of cornea is the root of corneal epithelium proliferation and migration
1983- Schofield et al proposed “niche hypothesis”.
1986- Schermer et al found the limbus of cornea was deficient in the expression of K3.
RELEVANT ANATOMY
The corneal epithelium -nonkeratinised, stratified squamous epithelial cells. Thickness ~50 mμ
Limbus-- CORNEA-stratified, nonkeratinised squamous epithelium
- CONJUNCTIVA-stratified, nonkeratinised columnar epithelium with mucin-secreting goblet cells
architecture of the limbus - palisade (of Vogt) arrangement.
Gradual transition
SITE OF LIMBAL STEM CELL
The limbal stem cells probably reside in the basal layer of the palisades of Vogt
Limbal stem cell- boundary of cornea, conjunctiva and sclera
RELEVANT PHYSIOLOGY
The corneal epithelium undergoes a constant process of cell renewal and regeneration
regenerates approximately every 7 days
proliferative reserve in the form of multipotent stem cells
Hypothesis- stem cells flourish only in limbal area - vascularity
The prevailing view of LESC proliferation –
one division of each LESC generates a daughter TAC that migrates centrally across the cornea while the original stem cell remains within its niche in the basal epithelium of the limbus.
TACs (Transient amplifying cells)- divide rapidly in basal cell layer
PMCs (Post mitotic cells)- wing cell layer
TDCs (Terminally differentiated cells)- squamous layer
The result of this migration and differentiation is that the corneal epithelium is renewed every 7–10 days in this manner
PROLIFERATION OF LIMBAL STEM CELLS
TAC
STEM CELL
PMC
TDC
STEM CELL NICHE
CORNEAL EPITHELIUM
Thoft and Friend - “XYZ hypothesis”
only partially explains corneal epithelial renewal over the lifetime of the cornea.
The basal corneal epithelial cells are incapable of continuous replication and enter senescence after several cell divisions
The XYZ Hypothesis:
X vector - combination of proliferation and centripetal migration of the basal epithelial cells.
Xs - asymmetric division of limbal epithelial stem cells- one daughter cell that remains in the limbus as a stem cell - a second daughter cell which migrates out of the limbus into the
basal corneal epithelium - transient amplifying cell (X TA ).
Th e X TA vector arises through a combination of proliferation and centripetal migration of the basal TACs.
Y vector- As the basal epithelial cells divide they give rise to suprabasal cells that form the stratifi ed layers of the cornea.
Z vector - shedding of squamous epithelial cells from the surface of cornea into the tear fi lm.
Corneal epithelial maintenance X + Y = Z,i.e. if corneal epithelium is to be maintained, cell loss must be balanced by cell replacement
Some stem cells migrate superficially within the limbal area. These limbal stem cells serve as a proliferative barrier between corneal and
conjunctival epithelia
The LESCs - finite body of cells that cannot be replaced naturally.
A state of corneal limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) occurs if the number of LESCs is depleted below a critical threshold by trauma or disease.
Conditions that significantly damage the limbal stem cells can result in-- invasion of conjunctival epithelium on to the corneal surface (conjunctivalisation).
Conjunctivalisation results in-- thickened, irregular, unstable epithelium, often with secondary neovascularisation
and inflammatory cell infiltration.
SIGNIFICANCE OF LIMBAL STEM CELL THEORY
To recognize the pathogenesis of many ocular surface diseases
To find the reason of failure of rebuliding ocular surface operations and corneal transplantations
TYPES OF LIMBAL STEM CELL DEFICIENCY
According to Etiology:- Primary- Secondary
PRIMARY-- related to an insufficient stromal microenvironment to support stem cell function- presumed site of pathophysiology -limbal stromal niche- Eg.-
- CONGENITAL: aniridia, dominantly inherited keratitis, Ectodermal dysplasia
- ACQUIRED: neurotrophic (neural and ischaemic) keratopathy and chronic limbitis
SECONDARY-(more common)-- ACQUIRED:
- related to external factors that destroy limbal stem cells - presumed site of pathophysiology – Limbal cells themselves- Eg.-
Traumatic- chemical (most common) or thermal injuries, iatrogenic (multiple surgeries or cryotherapies)
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) contact lens wear extensive microbial infection
TYPES
Iatrogenic:
Secondary to multiple surgeries Secondary to long term glaucoma medication
Sectorial limbal stem cell deficiency Secondary to Mitomycin C treatment
TYPES
According to extent of involvement:- Sectorial- Diffuse
SECTORIAL (PARTIAL)
- localized deficiency of LESCs in a region of limbus but an intact population of LESCs in other areas.
- Microscopically:- columnar keratopathy - mosaic pattern of stain with impression cytology
TYPES
DIFFUSE (TOTAL)
- functional loss of the entire LESC population- conjunctivalization of the entire cornea
TYPES
Staging System*
A. Normal B. Abnormal quiet C. Inflamed
I. <50% involvement
Iatrogenic, Contact lens, Pterygium
Old mild chemical injury Recent mild chemical injury, mild SJS
II. >50% involvement
Aniridia Old severe chemical injury
Recent severe chemical injury, severe SJS, OCP
* Ana Hidalgo-Simón, Eurotimes; April 2003
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
SYMPTOMS:- Tearing- Blepharospasm- Photophobia- decreased vision- recurrent episodes of pain (epithelial breakdown)- history of chronic inflammation with redness
SIGNS:
- The presence of a conjunctival phenotype on the cornea (conjunctival overgrowth, conjunctivalization) is central to the diagnosis of LSCD
- dull and irregular reflex of the corneal epithelium which varies in thickness and transparency
- an ingrowth of thickened fibrovascular pannus, chronic keratitis, scarring and calcification.
- Persistent epithelial defects- stippled fluorescein staining- melting and perforation of the cornea can occur
Diffuse LSCD: Partial LSCD (A) Diffuse illumination (B) Slit beam illumination
Partial stem cell deficiency-
- sectoral ingrowth of conjunctival epithelium from focal areas of SC deficiency
- clear line of demarcation- often, but not always, visible between corneal and conjunctival phenotype of cells
- At the line of contact of the two phenotypes, tiny "bud like projections" of normal corneal epithelium can be seen extending into the conjunctivalised area
- fluorescein pooling on the conjunctivalised side -because of its relative thinness
DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS Diagnosis is crucial because these patients are poor candidates for
conventional corneal transplantation
Histologically (impression cytology)- goblet cells containing conjunctival epithelium on the corneal surface
- In advanced disease- especially those where keratinisation of the epithelium occurs (SJS, ocular pemphigoid, Lyell syndrome), conjunctival goblet cells may be completely absent-not detectable
Immuno histo-chemically (monoclonal antibodies)- absence of a cornea-type differentiation (such as the absence of keratin CK3,12)- Presence of conjunctival phenotype (CK19)- presence of mucin in goblet cells
AVAILABLE TREATMENT OPTIONS
CONSERVATIVE OPTIONS:
- In Acute phase:- Immunosuppresion-
Topical steroids Cyclosporine
- use of intensive non-preserved lubrication- bandage contact lenses- autologous serum eye drops.- Only the latter is supported by evidence in the literature
Conservative treatment usually provides temporary remission but the condition tends to deteriorate over time.
SURGICAL OPTIONS:
PARTIAL LIMBAL STEM CELL DEFICIENCY-
- In the acute phase following injury-- repeated debridement of migrating conjunctival epithelium (sequential sector
conjunctival epitheliectomy (SSCE)- can reduce or prevent conjunctival ingrowth.
- The use of an amniotic membrane graft has also been reported to be successful
Conjunctival transplantation has been used to treat corneal stem cell deficiency.
supported by the hypothesis that conjunctival epithelium "transdifferentiates" into cornea-like epithelium.
Others believe-- Transdifferentiation does not occur in humans.- conjunctival transplantation in LESC deficiency is inferior to limbal
transplantation.
Conjunctival transplantation is, however useful in other conditions:- to reconstruct the conjunctival surface in cases of symblepharon- to treat primary and recurrent pterygia.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
TOTAL LIMBAL STEM CELL DEFICIENCY-
to restore a corneal phenotype- ocular surface reconstruction (OSR) is required
Indicated in-- bilateral blinding ocular surface diseases such as Stevens Johnson syndrome
(SJS), ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP), and severe chemical/ thermal burns.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
Clinically, the process involves a sequential three-step approach.
I. Correct any dry eye disease and lid abnormality that is contributing to ocular surface failure
- correction of meibomian gland dysfunction Corneal exposure Trichiasis entropion
- Punctal occlusion- Repair of symblepharon- frequent application of preservative-free artificial tears or autologous serum
SURGICAL OPTIONS
II. Remove the conjunctival epithelium from the cornea and restore a normal stromal environment
- Debridement of abnormal conjunctival epithelium and subepithelial fi brous tissue - mechanically -combined tissue peeled off the cornea.- peritomy and resection of the conjunctival epithelium for up to 4 mm from the
limbus, with application of mitomycin C over the exposed sclera to reduce recurrence of scarring and subepithelial fibroblastic proliferation.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
III. Transplant corneal LESCs to reestablish an intact and transparent epithelium
- conjunctival limbal autograft (CLAU)- living-related conjunctival limbal allograft (Lr-CLAL)- Keratolimbal allograft (KLAL)- ex vivo expansion and transplantation of cultured LESCs.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
CONJUNCTIVAL LIMBAL AUTOGRAFT (CLAU)
- First reported by Kenyon and Tseng in 1989
- transfer of autologous limbal tissue from the unaffected fellow eye to the stem cell deficient eye
SURGICAL OPTIONS
A significant percentage of the limbus is transferred for an autograft
partial stem cell deficiency in a previously normal eye
The use of an amniotic membrane graft to cover the defect in the donor eye may promote proliferation of the remaining LESCs and reduce this risk.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
Surgical procedure for performing a conjunctival-limbal autograft :
The eye on the left hand side of the image is normal.
The eye on the right has total limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
LIVING-RELATED CONJUNCTIVAL LIMBAL ALLOGRAFT TRANSPLANT (Lr-CLAL)
- In bilateral total LSCD- only potential source of LESCs- allogeneic limbus
- living-related conjuctival- limbal allograft transplantation (Lr-CLAL)- conjunctival-limbal graft is taken from a living related donor and transplanted to the recipient’s stem cell deficient eye
SURGICAL OPTIONS
- The surgical technique - identical to CLAU. - Amniotic membrane can be used similarly-
- To eliminate the concern of removing LESCs from the healthy donor eye - To augment the effect of CLAU in the recipient eye
- Risk - rejection of a Lr- CLAL- systemic immunosuppression required
SURGICAL OPTIONS
KERATOLIMBAL ALLOGRAFT TRANSPLANT (KLAL)
- using tissue from cadaveric donors- may restore the corneal phenotype in
- patients with bilateral LSCD - less commonly, in patients with unilateral LSCD who do not wish to jeopardize
the healthy eye with any surgery
- Because the tissue transplanted in KLAL is allogeneic,- systemic immunosuppression is required (like Lr-CLAL)
SURGICAL OPTIONS
most important limiting factor- Allograft rejection (despite systemic immunosuppression)
Signs of allograft rejection- - telangiectasia and engorged limbal blood vessels- epithelial rejection lines and epithelial breakdown- severe limbal inflammation
Amniotic membrane transplantation (as a corneal inlay)-- suppress inflammation- restore the damaged limbal stromal environment
SURGICAL OPTIONS
Ex Vivo EXPANSION AND TRANSPLANTATION OF CULTURED LIMBAL STEM CELLS
- Based on the pioneering work in skin of Rheinwald and Green
- First described in humans by Pellegrini et al. in 1997
SURGICAL OPTIONS
Schematic drawing of ex vivo expansion of limbal SC
(a) A limbal biopsy measuring 2 × 2 mm is performed on the donor eye
(b) This biopsy is then placed on amniotic membrane, allowed to adhere and then submerged in a culture medium
(c) Limbal epithelial cells migrate out of the biopsy onto the amnion, and after 2–3 weeks the epithelial outgrowth measures 2–3 cm in diameter
(d) After the fibrovascular pannus is removed from the recipient eye the explant is placed on the cornea
(e) sutured to the sclera
The protocols used to cultivate cells for transplantation vary widely.
- “explant culture system” – - a small limbal biopsy is placed directly onto an amniotic membrane - limbal epithelial cells migrate out of the biopsy - proliferate to form an epithelial sheet
- The amniotic membrane substrate is then purported to act as a surrogate stem cell niche environment
SURGICAL OPTIONS
- “suspension culture system” –
- limbal epithelial cells are first released from the limbal biopsy (enzyme treatment )- a suspension of individual cells is seeded
either onto amniotic membrane or onto a layer of growth-arrested 3T3 feeder cells.
- A carrier substrate such as fibrin may also be used to transfer the cells to the eye
SURGICAL OPTIONS
Theoretical advantages over CLAU and Lr-CLAL:
- substantially smaller size of the limbal biopsy is required (although more than one biopsy may be required to obtain a successful explant or cell culture).
- Minimizes the risk of precipitating stem cell failure in the donor eye and provides the option for a second biopsy if necessary
SURGICAL OPTIONS
Another advantage –
- potentially reduced risk of allograft rejection- due to the absence of antigen-presenting macrophages and Langerhan’s cells in
ex vivo cultured LEC grafts.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
ISSUES REQUIRING FURTHER INVESTIGATION:
- The exact proportion of SCs present in ex vivo cultured LEC sheets is unclear and needs to be determined.
- The behaviour of LESCs following transplantation also needs to be elucidated
SURGICAL OPTIONS
despite the diff erent methodologies employed, success rate and outcomes of ex vivo expansion and transplantation of limbal epithelium are remarkably similar.
As long as viable LESCs are transferred, the method that is used to achieve this is relatively unimportant.
The inability to identify transplanted cells on the cornea of patients more than 9 months after treatment may indicate that long-term survival of transplanted cells is not essential, and that other mechanisms are responsible for the improvement of the epithelial phenotype.
SURGICAL OPTIONS
AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE TRANSPLANTATION
first used by Kim and Tseng in1995- for corneal surface reconstruction in a rabbit model of limbal stem cell
deficiency
have also been used:- as an alternative to conjunctival flaps in treating persistent and refractory corneal
epithelial defects and ulceration- to create a limbal barrier in pterygium surgery
- for conjunctival surface reconstruction following- excision of tumours, scars and symblepharon
The amniotic membrane is a thick basement membrane and avascular stromal matrix.
As only the substrate without cells is employed, there is no adverse reaction of rejection
Action Mechanisms:
• Prolong life span and maintain clonogenicity of epithelial progenitor cells
• Promote non-goblet cell epithelial differentiation
• Promote goblet cell differentiation when combined with conjunctival fibroblasts
• Exclude inflammatory cells with anti-protease activities
• Suppress TGF- signaling system and myofibroblast differentiation of normal βfibroblasts
AMT
Observed Clinical Effects:
• Facilitate epithelialization
• Maintain normal epithelial phenotype
• Reduce inflammation
• Reduce vascularization
• Reduce scarring
AMT
LIMITATIONS:
- amniotic membrane transplantation is a substrate transplantation-- cannot be used to treat ocular surface disorders that are characterized with a
total loss of limbal epithelial stem cells or conjunctival epithelial stem cells.
- Because amniotic membrane transplantation still relies on the host tissue to supply epithelial and mesenchymal cells-- Can not be used in-
severe aqueous tear deficiency diffuse keratinization Exposure keratopathy in severe neurotrophic state Near total/toal stromal ischemia
AMT
Significance of Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation
Effective method for limbal stem cell deficiency to recover the integrity of ocular surface and rebuild limbal barrier
Successful limbal transplantation can achieve:- rapid surface healing- stable ocular surface without recurrent erosions or persistent epithelial defects- regression of corneal vascularization- restoration of a smooth and optically improved ocular surface
resulting in:- improved visual acuity- probably, increased success for subsequent keratoplasty.
RECENT ADVANCES
ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELLS
Oral mucosa:- Potential advantages-
- the cells are autologous- no risk of immune mediated rejection- immuosuppression is not required.
- oral mucosa -lower stage of differentiation than epidermal keratinocytes- they divide rapidly - can be maintained in culture for prolonged periods without keratinization.
- Theoretical disadvantage -- In treatment of autoimmune diseases (such as OCP) is that the oral and ocular
mucosa may both secrete a common basement membrane target antigen
Co-cultivated limbal and conjunctival epithelum:- Central area of HAM (human amniotic membrane) has limbal epithelial cells- Peripheral area- conjunctival epithelial cells- Advantage- total ocular surface reconstruction simultaneously
Other autologous sources:- Hemopoetic stem cells- Advantage- better long term survival without need of immunosuppression