Upload
kimberly-harris
View
80
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kimberly Harris,
Eshetu Dana, Patrick Antwi
And Mwanaisha Matumla
Submitted to Dr. McGee
Fall, 2016
University of Maryland University College
Abstract
Objective: To present macro-trends affect healthcare in
the U.S. in the future
Methodology: qualitative and quantitative data are
described, analyzed and synthesized
Evaluation & Recommendation: all data are evaluated
and risk management plan is designed to minimize risk
Summary: evidence based information related to
healthcare(pictures, videos, statistical values and
others) are summarized
• Macro-trends are defined as global trends that may have a significant future impact on the sectors of activity of interest to us. Those macro-trends affect health care system.
Definition of Macro-trends
1
2
3
ECONOMY
DEMOGRAPHICS
PERSONAL LIFESTYLES AND BEHAVIOR
There are five currently known Trends:
Economy, Demographics, Personal Lifestyle
& behavior, Technology, and Federal and
State Government Policies.
What Are The Five Trends of the US Healthcare
System ?
5 FEDERAL AND
STATE
GOVERNMENT
POLICIES
4 TECHNOLOGY
For further understanding what
macro-trends are, here is a video of
Trends in healthcare…
Gives further detailed
information about
trends that are affecting
the healthcare system.
Introduction
• This presentation introduces the five macro-
trends of the US healthcare system and how it
will shape the future. It will also explain the
factors that will impact the healthcare system
as well. These factors are analysis of the World
Health Organization (WHO) and consist of
social, cultural, economic, political or any other
activity human beings participates in.
• Therefore, the impact of these factors will be
accessed in recognizing advantages and risks.
• This presentation also introduces creation of
jobs based off those factors and
recommendations that will assist the new
opening of job opportunities.
Impacts on economy can be negative and positive so that
leadership focuses on leadership strategies to control
negative impacts.
The direct negative impact on the economic system consist of
two major issues:
1. Decreasing human resource.
2. Increasing treatment cost.
Quantitative structural, and intermediate traditions of
individuals have direct and indirect relationship with national
and international economic growth.
Work force age & gender – civilian labor force (above 16)…
63.3%; Civilian labor force (female)… 58.7%
Year 2010-2014 – With disability (under 65)… 8.5%; Without
insurance… 10.5%;
Macro-trend 1: Economy
Macro-trends has the greatest impact on demographic issues relating to
statistical data such as:
1 Gender- Male , Female and GLBT.
3 Birth rate –New born and its birth rate
2 Income – Poor versus Rich, ,Lower ,middle & upper class
4 Death rate – old age and its death rate
What we found? Macro-Trend 2:
Demographic
*Managing health problems of individuals in a given society has tremendous value
and contribution to the demographic changes to progress in normal condition.
What we found? Macro-Trend 3: Personal
Lifestyle and Behavior
Behavior: Behaviors will
cause more investing in
educational programs of
healthy living in schools
and workplaces
Personal Lifestyle: unhealthy
lifestyle such as smoking, alcohol
consumption, physical inactivity,
unhealthy dietary practices.
This causes acute chronic diseases;
heart diseases, obesity, and forms
of cancers.
Technology
1 Biotechnology Innovation Organization
purely based on biology; uses technologies
to process cells and biological .
2 Currently using human stem cells to
test new drugs; This can help guarantee
to generate cells and tissues that can
be used for cell based therapy.
3 Treat diseases like spinal cord injuries,
burns, heart diseases, diabetes,
osteoarthritis, macular degeneration,
and rheumatoid arthritis.
What we found? Macro-trend 4: Technology
- Biotechnology and Non-Biotechnology
Biotechnology: reducing
rates of infectious
diseases.
Top trend in biotechnology are
stem cell therapies and
personalized medicines.
1 Federal Law: HIPAA (Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration Act)
2 State Law: OSHA; MOSH (Maryland…);
3 Workplace Medical Surveillance –
Federal Law; Persons at risk of
contracting or spreading a
disease – State Law; Child abuse
or neglect – State Law
Consist of both Federal and State Laws
What we found? Macro-rend 5: Federal and
State Government Policies
• Pharmaceutical health insurance
• Nursing homes; home healthcare
• Ambulatory services; Laboratories
• Hospital Administration; Private Practice
Potential Job Opportunities
1 2 3The overall poverty rate according to the
Supplemental Poverty Measure is 14.3%;
significantly higher than the official
poverty rate of 13.5 percent.
Under the Supplemental Poverty Measure,
there are 45.7 million living in poverty.
2.6 million more than are represented by
the official poverty measure (43.1 million).
• 43.1 million people (13.5%) were in poverty.
• 24.4 million (12.4%) of people ages 18-64 are in poverty.
• 14.5 million (19.7%) children below 18 are in poverty.
• 4.2 million (8.8%) seniors 65 and older are in poverty.
Poverty causes Health Problem that needs
Immediate Solution
Recommendations assisting job opportunities in the health system…
• Promoting safe daily activities to minimize risk
upon vulnerable individuals.
• Managing and controlling job related hazards.
• Facilitating environmental issues with a specific
plan.
Therefore, in conclusion, economy, demographics, personal lifestyle and behavior, and government policies are all
macro-trends that affect the United States healthcare system.
Requires special policies, plans, and recommendations to control issues of US Healthcare system
Demands a high number of healthcare professionals and health care leaders
Managing one’s personal lifestyles to ensure safety and success of their health.
Conclusion
• Amini, C., & Bianco, S. D. (2016). Poverty, growth, inequality and pro-poor factors: new evidence from macro data. Journal Of Developing Areas, (2), 231.
• Burch, R. C., Loder, S., Loder, E., & Smitherman, T. A. (2015). The Prevalence and Burden of Migraine and Severe Headache in the United States: Updated Statistics From
Government Health Surveillance Studies. Headache: The Journal Of Head & Face Pain, 55(1), 21-34. doi:10.1111/head.12482
• Everest, S., & Phillips, A. (2015). Socioeconomic factors affecting the health of people with diabetes. Practice Nursing, 26(4), 185-188.
• Khorasani, E., Keyvanara, M., Karimi, S., & Jazi, M. J. (2014). Views of Health System Experts on Macro Factors of Induced Demand. International Journal Of Preventive
Medicine,5(10), 1286-1298.
• Lowe, M., Chen, D., & Huang, S. (2016). Social and Cultural Factors Affecting Maternal Health in Rural Gambia: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Plos ONE, 11(9), 1-16.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163653
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration: United States Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/generalshreferences/journals.html
• Nieuwendyk, L. M., Belon, A. P., Vallianatos, H., Raine, K. D., Schopflocher, D., Spence, J. C., & ... Nykiforuk, C. I. (2016). How perceptions of community environment influence
health behaviours: using the Analysis Grid for Environments Linked to Obesity Framework as a mechanism for exploration.Maladies Chroniques Et Blessures Au Canada,
36(9), 175-184.
• Valdmanis, V. (2015). Factors Affecting Well-Being at the State Level in the United States. Journal Of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 985-997
• World Health Organization (WHO).Macro-determinants of health Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hia/evidence/doh/en/
• Zardo, P., Collie, A., & Livingstone, C. (2015). Organisational factors affecting policy and programme decision making in a public health policy environment. Evidence &
Policy: A Journal Of Research, Debate & Practice, 11(4), 509-527. doi:10.1332/174426414X14170304008766
• Brady, M. E. (2016). Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, and the “Invisible Hand”: A Metaphor For Ambiguity-Uncertainty Aversion by Decision Makers. Scholedge
International Journal Of Management & Development, 3(5), 97-102. doi:10.19085/journal.sijmd030501
• Qu, W. G., & Yang, Z. (2015). The effect of uncertainty avoidance and social trust on supply chain collaboration. Journal Of Business Research, 68(5), 911-918.
doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.017
References