21
Meeting the golden rule? Christine Frayne

Meeting The Golden Rule

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Meeting The Golden Rule

Citation preview

Page 1: Meeting The Golden Rule

Meeting the golden rule?

Christine Frayne

Page 2: Meeting The Golden Rule

Changes since PBR 2004

• Forecasts for economic growth unchanged

• Small forecasting changes• Higher equity prices boost current & future receipts• But lower NICs and public sector corporation profits

• Small net discretionary change• £265m tightening in 2005–06• Small net giveaway thereafter

Page 3: Meeting The Golden Rule

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

Budget2001 -

Giveaway

Budget2001 -

Takeaway

Budget2005 -

Giveaway

Budget2005 -

Takeaway

£ bi

llion

Other

Pensioners

Home owners(?)

Anti-avoidance

Stamp duty

Oil companies

Children

Income tax

Motorists

Small pre-election giveaway

£3.5bn

–£0.3bn

Page 4: Meeting The Golden Rule

The Chancellor’s fiscal rules

• Golden rule: only borrow to invest • Receipts cover current spending• Surplus or balance on current budget• Judged over the economic cycle

• Sustainable investment rule: debt at a ‘stable and prudent’ level, <40% of national income

Page 5: Meeting The Golden Rule

Meeting the golden rule? (1)

2.2 2.2

1.0

-1.3-1.8

-1.4

-0.5

-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.5

99–0

0

00–0

1

01–0

2

02–0

3

03–0

4

04–0

5

05–0

6

06–0

7

07–0

8

08–0

9

09–1

0

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Current cycle?

Source: HM Treasury

Page 6: Meeting The Golden Rule

Meeting the golden rule? (1)

2.2 2.2

1.0

-1.3-1.8

-1.4

-0.5

0.00.3

0.6 0.8

-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.5

99–0

0

00–0

1

01–0

2

02–0

3

03–0

4

04–0

5

05–0

6

06–0

7

07–0

8

08–0

9

09–1

0

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Next cycle?Current cycle?

Source: HM Treasury

Page 7: Meeting The Golden Rule

Meeting the golden rule? (2)

-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.5

99–0

0

00–0

1

01–0

2

02–0

3

03–0

4

04–0

5

05–0

6

06–0

7

07–0

8

08–0

9

09–1

0

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

Budget 02Budget 03Budget 04Budget 05

Source: HM Treasury

Cyclically adjusted current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Page 8: Meeting The Golden Rule

Room to manoeuvre?

• PBR 2nd December 2004• Golden rule met with £8bn to spare

• ONS revision 28th February 2005• Margin increases by £3bn• Golden rule now met with £11bn to spare

• Budget 16th March 2005• Golden rule now met with £6bn to spare

Page 9: Meeting The Golden Rule

-10.5

-12.5

-15.9 -16.1

-5.5-6.9

-13.4

-5.7

-18.0

-16.0

-14.0

-12.0

-10.0

-8.0

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

Budget 04 PBR 04IFS GreenBudget 05 Budget 05

£ bi

llion

2004-052005-06

Meeting the golden rule? (3)

-£10.8

Page 10: Meeting The Golden Rule

Forecasting uncertainty

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

1999

-200

0

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

Central

Source: IFS calculations

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Page 11: Meeting The Golden Rule

Forecasting uncertainty

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

1999

-200

0

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

20%

Central

20%

Source: IFS calculations

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Page 12: Meeting The Golden Rule

Forecasting uncertainty

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

1999

-200

0

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

40%

20%

Central

20%

40%

Source: IFS calculations

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Page 13: Meeting The Golden Rule

Forecasting uncertainty

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

1999

-200

0

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

60%

40%

20%

Central

20%

40%

60%

Source: IFS calculations

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Page 14: Meeting The Golden Rule

Forecasting uncertainty

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

1999

-200

0

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

80%60%40%20%Central20%40%60%80%

Source: IFS calculations

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Page 15: Meeting The Golden Rule

Forecasting uncertainty

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

1999

-200

0

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

Financial year

Per

cent

age

of n

atio

nal i

ncom

e

80%60%40%20%Central20%40%60%80%

Source: IFS calculations

Current budget surplus, as a share of national income

Page 16: Meeting The Golden Rule

Will the golden rule be met?

82.2%74.2%

59.1%62.9%

44.5%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Budget 02 Budget 03 Budget 04 Budget 05 IFS GreenBudget 05

Per

cent

age

Source: IFS Calculations

Page 17: Meeting The Golden Rule

Taxes to rise, spending to stabilise?

35.0

36.0

37.0

38.0

39.0

40.0

41.0

96

–9

7

97

–9

8

98

–9

9

99

–0

0

00

–0

1

01

–0

2

02

–0

3

03

–0

4

04

–0

5

05

–0

6

06

–0

7

07

–0

8

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of n

atio

na

l in

com

e

Current expenditureCurrent receiptsGreen Budget revenue projection

Source: HM Treasury; IFS Green Budget

Page 18: Meeting The Golden Rule

Forecast growth in revenues

4.4

0.5

2.0

3.5

3.5

4.7

13.2

0 5 10 15

Excise Duties

VAT

'Other taxes and royalties'

NICs

Income tax

Corporation Tax

Of which

Current receipts

Average annual real growth

Average annual real growth in revenues, 2004–05 to 2007–08

Source: HM Treasury

Page 19: Meeting The Golden Rule

The parties compared: 2007–08

Tory Lib Dem

Net change in tax

–£4bn +£4bn

Net change in spending

–£12bn +£4bn

Net change in borrowing

–£8bn No change

Page 20: Meeting The Golden Rule

The parties compared: 2007–08

Tory Lib Dem

Labour

baseline

plans

Net change in tax

–£4bn +£4bn +£25bn

Net change in spending

–£12bn +£4bn +£13bn

Net change in borrowing

–£8bn No change –£11bn

Page 21: Meeting The Golden Rule

Conclusions

• Public finances little changed since the PBR• Despite £3bn improvement from ONS revision

• Over current economic cycle• Whether golden rule is met likely to go to the wire

• Over the next economic cycle• Tax burden set to grow• New tax raising measures might still be required