Upload
sujit-ghosh
View
203
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
William Bellows Presented at SCQAA San Fernando valley Chapter On October 16 2013. It was a great interactive evening.
Citation preview
Insights from Mixed Model
Management (on How to Manage Projects and not Tasks)
Presented by Bill Bellows
Associate Fellow
InThinking Network
Aerojet Rocketdyne
Email: [email protected], Cell: 818-519-8209
President
In2:InThinking Network, www.in2in.org
Email: [email protected], Cell: 562-204-6246
SCQAA Chapter Meeting
October 16, 2013
Tank Engines and Rocket
Engines
Audiences
Product / Program / Project
As Conceived
Replacing the screwdriver
Pilot holes
Hole saw
Drywall installation
Concrete
The top 5 uses:
1. Replacing the screwdriver
2. Pilot holes
3. Hole saw
4. Drywall installation
5. Concrete
Product / Program / Project
As Managed As Conceived
What if every professional firefighter in the world followed their
country’s firefighting orders? Would there ever be another
firefighting injury? Or, in a manufacturing plant, what if standard
planning and processes were followed by every operator, to the
letter; would defect-free parts be produced time and again? The
planning model of interchangeable parts, with major contribution
often given to Honore Blanc, who resided in France in the late
1700's, offers such a vision, with an outcome of products,
processes, and services that "work" (as planned), including zero
fire fighting fatalities. The American System of Manufacturing
followed shortly thereafter when Thomas Jefferson's
implementation vision was shared with Eli Whitney, leading to
the first-ever contract with the US Congress for a product made
with interchangeable parts…..
Abstract
….Make that perfectly interchangeable parts, including those
who fabricate them and those who fight fires.
The simple design model of interchangeable parts, defined as a
Macro System Model, is founded upon a set of assumptions that
will be highlighted in this presentation. As a fitting complement,
a second model, the Micro System Model, will be shared in a
presentation that reveals explanations for all too frequent
consternation and problems, let alone the failed solutions.
Such are the realities when products and services are created
by processes without an understanding of the significant
difference a Macro and a Micro System Model. Mixed Model
Management offers the ability to use both models to their full
advantage and, thereby, reduce problems and increase profits.
Abstract
Agenda •Models
•Quiz
•Modes of Thinking
•Purposeful Resource Management
•Purposeful Resource Leadership
•Opportunities to Act
•Opportunities to Think
Models Several years ago, Linda LoRe, CEO of
Frederick's of Hollywood, shared a story of
speaking with MBA students about
Frederick's and their strategy to compete with
Victoria's Secret and their supermodels,
including Gisele Bündchen. As the business
school engagement was ending, Linda fielded
a seemingly personal question; "I have to
ask...in your role as the CEO, do you get to
work with the models?"
Mental Models A mental model is an explanation of
someone's thought process about how
something works in the real world. It is a
representation of the surrounding world, the
relationships between its various parts and a
person's intuitive perception about his or her
own acts and their consequences. Mental
models can help shape behavior and set an
approach to solving problems (akin to a
personal algorithm) and doing tasks.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_model
Mental Models
Essentially, all models are wrong,
but some are useful.
Professor George Box
Ownership
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Proactive
Reactive
“Mine” “Ours”
Resource Management Model
Resource Management
Reactive – applying effort after “bad,”
“not OK,” “sick,” or “incorrect” happens
Proactive – applying effort while “good,”
“OK,” “well,” or “correct” is happening
“Every dollar we invest in high-quality
early education can save more than $7
later on”
“An ounce of prevention is worth a
pound of cure”
“A stitch in time saves nine”
Resource Management
“What we see depends on what we
thought before we looked.”
Myron Tribus
Perception & Thinking
Quiz
Horse Trading
“The secret to selling a horse is…
Mark Twain
How much time is spent discussing
parts, tasks, activities, program
milestones, etc. which are good and
completed on time?
Time Management
How much time is spent studying for
the final exam, questions from weekly
quizzes and the mid-term which were
correct?
Time Management
How important is customer satisfaction?
Satisfaction
Value
Disappointment
Expectation
Expectation Management
Buying Watermelons and
Briquettes
Grades
What letter grade is required for all
purchased parts and services, as well
as tasks completed internally?
Handoff Requirements?
D E F
P
G I H
Task Flow
Task Grades
Task Management
Sub-
Assembly 1
Task A Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Task B
Task O
Task P
Sub-
Assembly 2
Product
Assembly
Assembly Final Assembly
FIT
FIT
FIT
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Macro System Model Task Completion
Sub-
Assembly 1
Task A Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Task B
Task O
Task P
Sub-
Assembly 2
Product
Assembly
Assembly Final Assembly
FIT
FIT
FIT
GOOD
WORKS
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Macro System Model Task Completion
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Task Grades
Cutting Wood
Given a piece of wood that will be cut into
2 pieces, how many lines will be drawn
across the top face before the cut is
made?
(target)
1 line
Cutting Wood
target
2 lines
Cutting Wood
MAX MIN
HOLE DIAMETER
MAX MIN
25 20
PAGE COUNT
OUTER DIAMETER
Examples of Task
Management
100 FT 0 FT
DISTANCE FROM THE DOOR
MAX MIN
HOLE DIAMETER
MAX MIN
25 20
PAGE COUNT
OUTER DIAMETER
Macro System
Task Management
100 FT 0 FT
DISTANCE FROM THE DOOR
= =
= =
MAX MIN
HOLE DIAMETER
MAX MIN
25 20
PAGE COUNT
OUTER DIAMETER
Micro System
Task Management
100 FT 0 FT
DISTANCE FROM THE DOOR
= =
= =
Resource Management
Contrast
MAX MIN
HOLE DIAMETER
MAX MIN
OUTER DIAMETER
MAX MIN
HOLE DIAMETER
MAX MIN
OUTER DIAMETER
Resource Management
Contrast
MAX MIN
HOLE DIAMETER
MAX MIN
OUTER DIAMETER
MAX MIN
HOLE DIAMETER
MAX MIN
OUTER DIAMETER
MIND THE TASK MIND THE GAP
Upper
Specification
Limit
Lower
Specification
Limit
TARGET
(desired
value of
parameter)
“Loss to
Society”
Taguchi’s Quality Loss
Function
Sub-
Assembly 1
Task A Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Task B
Task O
Task P
Sub-
Assembly 2
Product
Assembly
Assembly Final Assembly
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Step 1
Step 2
Step N
Degrees of
GOOD
Degrees of WORKS
Degrees of FIT
Degrees of FIT
Degrees of FIT
Micro System Model Task Completion
Modes of Thinking
Categories
Absolutes
Discrete / Digital
How many students
at CSUN? How
many faculty?
Continuum
Relative
Wholeness / Analog
Better/Faster/Cheaper/
Smarter/etc.
Students are different,
faculty are different
Modes of Thinking
Categories
Absolutes
Discrete / Digital
How many students
at CSUN? How
many faculty?
Continuum
Relative
Wholeness / Analog
Better/Faster/Cheaper/
Smarter/etc.
Students are different,
faculty are different
Modes of Thinking
Purposeful
Resource
Management
Ownership
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Proactive
Reactive
“Mine” “Ours”
P
U
R
P
O
S
E
F
U
L
REFLEXIVE
Resource Management
Purposeful
Resource
Leadership
Assumptions
A better way to operate an organization is
to invest resources with the ability to
manage customer delight, satisfaction,
and disappointment
Better investment results from discovering
opportunities to invest
The discovery of opportunities for
investment is limited by how thinking is
conditioned
What is needed ?
Thinking that promotes better
discovery
Opportunities to Act
Opportunities to Act (differences that make a difference)
Category Thinking vs. Continuum Thinking
Macro Systems vs. Micro Systems
Attention to “Good” elements
Customer Satisfaction vs. Customer
Delight
Perception & Thinking
“How the world we perceive
works depends on how we think.
The world we perceive is a world
we bring forth through our thinking.”
H. Thomas Johnson
Source: (article) A Different Perspective on Quality, Johnson, 1997
Opportunities to
Think
An InThinking Roadmap AKA The Hotel California
InThinking Together (9 hrs) (Formerly known as “ET” and “Understanding Variation”)
Six Thinking
Hats (8 hrs)
Kepner - Tregoe
(24 hrs) (Problem Solving and
Decision Making)
Workshop”)
Managing
Variation as a
System
(9 hrs)
The New
Economics
Study Session
(14 hrs)
Understanding Taguchi Methods – Part 2
(40 hrs)
Understanding
Taguchi Methods – Part 1
(40 hrs)
DATT (16 hrs)
-
(Problem Solving and
DATT (16 hrs) DATT (16 hrs)
Design of Experiments &
Taguchi Methods – An
Overview (16 hrs)
Leading Systems
(12 hrs)
(AKA the “Organization
Resource Leadership
(8 hrs)
OD
(4th week, Th/Fri, 12-2pm PT)
Prerequisites
BTA…webinar
(2nd week, Th/11:30-1pm PT)
Lateral Thinking
(16 hrs)
TARGET AUDIENCES: Members of management,
individual contributors, suppliers, and customers who
are providing leadership in "enterprise thinking"
activities. Family members, "members of the
community" and students are welcome to attend.
"Members of the community" are citizens who are
involved full or part time, or in a volunteer capacity, in
community related work. Examples include hospital
employees, teachers, religious leaders, scouting
leaders, and youth sports volunteers.
An InThinking Roadmap
An InThinking Roadmap AKA The Hotel California
InThinking Together (9 hrs) (Formerly known as “ET” and “Understanding Variation”)
Six Thinking
Hats (8 hrs)
Kepner - Tregoe
(24 hrs) (Problem Solving and
Decision Making)
Workshop”)
Managing
Variation as a
System
(9 hrs)
The New
Economics
Study Session
(14 hrs)
Understanding Taguchi Methods – Part 2
(40 hrs)
Understanding
Taguchi Methods – Part 1
(40 hrs)
DATT (16 hrs)
-
(Problem Solving and
DATT (16 hrs) DATT (16 hrs)
Design of Experiments &
Taguchi Methods – An
Overview (16 hrs)
Leading Systems
(12 hrs)
(AKA the “Organization
Resource Leadership
(8 hrs)
OD
(4th week, Th/Fri, 12-2pm PT)
Prerequisites
Distance Learning
Opportunities
BTA…webinar
(2nd week, Th/11:30-1pm PT)
Lateral Thinking
(16 hrs)
Monthly Announcement
In2:InThinking Network 2014 Forum
Succeed with Inquiry: Insights, Knowledge, Action June 18 - 22, 2014 in Los Angeles, California
The In2:InThinking Network was formed in
2001 by a group of students of the work of
W. Edwards Deming and related theorists,
including Russell Ackoff, Edward de Bono,
Tom Johnson, Peter Senge, and Genichi
Taguchi. The aim of our network is to make
thinking about sub-systems, variation,
knowledge, and psychology, and their
interaction – which comprises Deming's
System of Profound Knowledge - more
conscious. We believe that such thinking
about thinking, which we call “InThinking," will
allow people to better perceive relationships
and interdependencies in human endeavors, and consequently act to make those
endeavors more valuable, more satisfying, and more joyful. The aim of our 5-day In2:IN
2014 Forum is to continue to elevate the consciousness of individual and collective
thinking. Join us in learning, connecting, and improving how we can work, learn, and
think together. Registration fee: $400, with a $50 discount for registering on or before
May 7th.
Learn more about our 2014 Forum at our website at www.in2in.org
“Little progress can be made by
merely attempting to repress
what is evil; our great hope lies
in developing what is good.”
Calvin Coolidge
“All that we have comes from
people who are responsible only
to themselves.”
W. Edwards Deming
Insights from Mixed Model
Management (on How to Manage Projects and not Tasks)
Presented by Bill Bellows
Associate Fellow
InThinking Network
Aerojet Rocketdyne
Email: [email protected], Cell: 818-519-8209
President
In2:InThinking Network, www.in2in.org
Email: [email protected], Cell: 562-204-6246
SCQAA Chapter Meeting
October 16, 2013