34
NEGOTIATION HARVARD STYLE Mahmoud Khater

Negotiation Harvard Style

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Based on "Getting to Yes", published by Harvard Project on negotiation, this is a quick session prepared for

Citation preview

Page 1: Negotiation Harvard Style

NEGOTIATIONHARVARD STYLE

Mahmoud Khater

Page 2: Negotiation Harvard Style

Car Negotiation exercise

Page 3: Negotiation Harvard Style

Car negotiation exercise (Analysis)

Final sale price: high, low or appropriate.

Why?

Page 4: Negotiation Harvard Style

The Program on Negotiation

• University consortium,

• Established in 1983,

• Harvard University, MIT and Tufts University,

• Courses, Trainings, Books, Newsletters, Journals.

Page 5: Negotiation Harvard Style

Negotiation Vs Bargaining

• A structured interaction or dialogue, between two or more parties, aiming at resolving a difference to reach an agreement.

• The most common way of negotiation, where parties take a position and argue for them while making concessions to reach a compromise (positional bargaining).

Page 6: Negotiation Harvard Style

Negotiation:

A structured interaction or dialogue, between two or more parties, aiming at resolving a difference to reach an agreement.

Page 7: Negotiation Harvard Style

Personal Reflections: Positional Bargaining

Party 1: Party 2:

Initial Position of Party 1:Initial Position of Party 2:

Final Position of Party 1:Final Position of Party 2:

Page 8: Negotiation Harvard Style

Positional Bargaining

DRAWBACKS???

Page 9: Negotiation Harvard Style

The drawbacks of positional bargaining

1. It misses out an opportunity of better solutions;

Example: Why do you want the orange?

2. Its context encourages lying and deception;

3. Damages relationships;

4. It usually results in a Win-Lose and misses the Win-

Win;

Page 10: Negotiation Harvard Style

BUT: We still use it!

Why??

1. Requires very little planning;

2. Very Convenient;

3. It works, It delivers results;

4. It is a learned behavior;

5. It can be applied to any situation.

Page 11: Negotiation Harvard Style

Fundamentals of Strategic Negotiations-PIHPOC-

1. Principles

2. Interests

3. Humane

4. Possibilities

5. Objective Criteria

Page 12: Negotiation Harvard Style

Zone of Possible Agreement (ZOPA)

Page 13: Negotiation Harvard Style

BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement)

Your best alternative to a negotiated agreement.

“The negotiating power of a party is partly determined by how attractive is the option of not reaching an

agreement.”

Page 14: Negotiation Harvard Style

Fundamentals of Strategic Negotiations(1)

1.Based on Principles:

a) We shall not lie;

b) We shall not deceive;

c) We shall not take unfair advantage of someone’s weakness;

Page 15: Negotiation Harvard Style

Fundamentals of Strategic Negotiations(2)

2. Focus on Interests, not positions;

3. Be mindful of the Human angle;

4. Generate a variety of Possibilities before deciding what to do;

5. Insist on an Objective Criteria: negotiate on the standards before negotiation on the substance.

PIHPOC

Page 16: Negotiation Harvard Style

Principles

• A fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning.

• A rule or belief governing one's personal behavior (regardless of the consequences).

• Principles for Negotiation:a) We shall not lie;

b) We shall not deceive;

c) We shall not take unfair advantage of someone’s weakness;

Page 17: Negotiation Harvard Style

Interests

• Identify, ask why?

• Multiple interests (prioritize them)

• Multiple stakeholders (example: buying new mobile for your son)

Page 18: Negotiation Harvard Style

The four basics of the human angle: (Perception, emotions, communication, and authority)

Perceptions

1. Understand that people may have different perceptions of the same reality.

2. For people, their perceptions are their reality and they will act accordingly.

3. The better you understand yours and the other party’s perceptions, the better you can negotiate.

Page 19: Negotiation Harvard Style

Steps to understand the other party’s perceptions

1. Put yourself in their shoes;

2. Identify possible perceptions and check if they believe in one of them.

3. Listen very carefully.

4. Discuss each other’s perceptions.

5. In the event of negative perception about you, act inconsistently with their perceptions.

Page 20: Negotiation Harvard Style

The Importance Of First Impressions

7 Seconds

“You never have a second chance to make a good first impression”

Page 21: Negotiation Harvard Style

Steps to tackle emotions in negotiations

1. Be calm. 2. Recognize emotions; theirs and yours. 3. Make emotions explicit. 4. Let the other side let off steam. 5. Check Emotional Bank Account Balance

Page 22: Negotiation Harvard Style

Body Language – 55%

Tone of Voice – 38 %

Use of Words – 7 %

Prof. Albert Mahrebian

Body Language- Tone of Voice- Use of Words

Page 23: Negotiation Harvard Style

Facts

1. Eight positions for our brows and forehead.2. Seventeen positions for our eyes and eyelids.3. Forty five positions for our lower jaw.4. Forty three distinct and separate muscle movements in the

face giving us a combination of 10,000 identifiable facial configurations.

5. Some facial expressions are fleeting, lasting for four hundredth of a second.

Reference: Performance Management,Baguley, Phil; Contemporary Books, 2003

Page 24: Negotiation Harvard Style

Human Angle: Non-verbal Communication

1. Speech pace and pauses2. Pitch and tone3. Use of space and distance4. Body motion and gestures5. Body posture6. Facial expressions7. Gaze8. Touch and body contact9. Style of written text

Page 25: Negotiation Harvard Style

The impact of a speaker's feelings and attitudes in a

conversation

7%

55%

38%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Verbal (words) Visual (face) Vocal (voice)

Impa

ct

Verbal (words)

Visual (face)

Vocal (voice)

Source: Making Presentations Happen by Michael Brown 2004

Page 26: Negotiation Harvard Style

Your words versus how you present them

7%

93%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Your Words How you present

your words?

Impa

ct

Your Words

How you presentyour words?

Source: Making Presentations Happen by Michael Brown 2004

Page 27: Negotiation Harvard Style

PossibilitiesThe four major obstacles towards a creative mutually beneficial solution

1. Premature judgment.2. Searching for the single answer. 3. Assumption of the fixed pie. 4. Solving their problem is their problem.

Page 28: Negotiation Harvard Style

Objective Criteria (standards)

1. Market value 2. Precedent 3. Scientific judgment 4. Professional standards 5. Law or Court Ruling6. Moral standards 7. Shariah 8. Tradition

Page 29: Negotiation Harvard Style

Four steps to PIHPOC

1. List out all the applicable standards. 2. Negotiate on the standards before negotiation on

the substance. 3. Don’t yield to pressure, only to principles.4. Learn to say no.

Page 30: Negotiation Harvard Style

Negotiation Techniques

• Deliberate deception• Niccolo Machiavelli– “The end justifies the means”– “It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver”

DO YOUR HOMEWORK;DO NOT ALLOW TO GET DECIEVED

Page 31: Negotiation Harvard Style

Negotiation Techniques

• GC-BC (video)– Don’t always be the Good Cop

• Deferring to Higher Authority– I will check with my boss/committee/wife…”– Take a concession from counterparty, without

giving any.– Combined with GC-BC (how)

ASK in the beginning? (how)

Page 32: Negotiation Harvard Style

Negotiation Techniques

Extreme demands

Page 33: Negotiation Harvard Style

Negotiation Techniques

1. Stressful physical

conditions

2. Personal attacks

3. Threats

4. Refusal to negotiate

5. Escalating demands

6. Decoy technique

7. A calculated delay

8. The reluctant buyer

Page 34: Negotiation Harvard Style

More Resources

Make sure you apply your principles

Thank You