Upload
third-sector-research-centre
View
396
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Open Public ServicesThe changing role of the third sector
David Mullins, Rosie Meek and James Rees
Evidence Review
Partnerships
Scoping work and
20+ papers
HousingHealth and Social Care
Employment Criminal Justice
Engage with
sector
Policy / Impact
Open Public
Services
Commissioning 2012
Commissioning 2012
Our research
Open Public Services White Paper Public Services model seen as outdated. Proposals to:• Increase Choice– Presumption of preference for individual level
services ; “our vision is for public services that revolve around each of us”
– Neighbourhood and Commissioned services • Decentralise Power to lowest appropriate level• Open public services to range of providers– (“competing to offer a better service”)
• Government’s key role is to ensure fair access
Open Public Services Locating our Research
Principles Individual Neighbourhood Commissioned
Choice Health & social care
Decentralisation
Diversity Housing PartnershipsCriminal Justice
Fairness
Accountability Employment Services
Ensuring Diversity & Enabling Open Public Services: ‘new innovative providers’ , entry barriers, ‘continuity regimes’, ‘avoid switching from one monopoly to another’
Partnerships – themes • Partnership is incredibly varied • Merger: on a continuum of choices TSOs are seeking to
reduce duplication, be efficient, have influence• Hard to compile evidence about benefits or otherwise
of partnership: attribution issues, data, ‘warm glow’ effects
• Partnerships strongest where: there is external funding to be pursued AND partners have ownership AND clear (shared) purpose AND potential synergy – conversely externally mandated and steered
partnerships the LEAST SUCCESSFUL
Partnerships & Open Public Services• Conflict between ‘partnership’ and top-down
procurement agendas?• Work Programme: PBR creates tensions for
partnerships: privileges hierarchy or strongly-led consortia
• What is happening on the ground? local government. partnerships on back burner everywhere – but scope for shared local services after cuts?
• Can TSOs / spin-outs compete in new environment?
Cautious approach needed given the current evidence base
Criminal Justice – themes• Focus on Prisons and Resettlement
• Qualitative explorations
• Using existing datasets to identify the number of TSOs that work with offenders
• Levels of awareness of resettlement-focused TSOs in prisons remains low
Some TSOs had few prisoners reporting use of services despite prisons reporting working relationships
Engagement with and awareness of TSOs: prisoner self reportsN = 680, age 15-78 years (mean age 32) n = 15-31 TSOs, total = 116 TSOs
Population Type of prison (two privately run)
Response rate n (% population)
Female Closed 85 (18)Male Open, training 50 (10)Male Open, local 90 (9)Male Juvenile 19 (4)Female Open, training 16 (11)Male Closed 66 (12)Male young adults Closed 46 (10)Male Closed local 308 (25)
Criminal Justice – further questions
• The effectiveness of TSOs in meeting offenders’ needs appears to vary considerably between pathways
• Becoming major arena for outcome-based commissioning and Payment by Results
• Broader aspects of Criminal Justice: Policing, Probation, Victims
Health and Social Care – themes
• Personalisation • Carers • Health Reforms• Commissioning relationships• Spin-outs • Social care and the third sector
Health and Social Care and Open Public Services
• What can we learn from earlier attempts to externalise public services? (housing, leisure trusts)
• Can clinical commissioning groups work with third sector for more ‘joined up services’?
• Key role of carers and advocates in personalisation• Are social enterprises ready and able to compete for
provision of services? • Are commissioners ready to let go?What impact will the need for greater financial savings
have on this agenda?
Housing – themes SIZE MATTERS! scoping work led to focus on self-help
and large Housing Associations – self-help housing strong ‘policy fit’ to current agendas
such as Big Society and localism – research tracks policy action
– Large housing organisations seen as ‘the distant uncle’ what can we learn from uncle? • Balancing social and commercial aims is a key
management dynamic of large housing TSOs • Partnerships with small TSOs can deliver social
value – research tracks social investment and partnerships
Housing and Open Public Services• Housing TSOs deliver a range of neighbourhood
services (directly and through partnerships) • Should housing TSOs be treated as ‘public bodies’ – how
does this affect ability to attract finance? • Scaling up and policy fit challenges for small community
based groups such as self-help housing• Experience of housing transfers suggests different
advantages for Arms Length and fully independent forms – Transfer may lead to less locally based decisions and re-agglomeration into Regional/ national groups
Next Steps – Employment Project• We are ‘mapping’ the Work Programme• Rhetoric of Big Society: but many organisations
large and how distinctive, innovative, trusted?• Reality of supply chain function – case studies
of subcontractors• How do different types of TSO experience the
Work Programme supply chain?• Outcomes/‘results’ of WP won’t come until
2013
Next Steps – cross-sector and cross-stream research
• What have we learned about ‘spin-outs’ from health, housing and leisure services?
• How can TSOs play a more influential role in commissioning, rather than simply being seen as alternative providers?
• How can we explain the weaker outcomes in the housing prisoner resettlement pathway – how does this relate to organisation of advice and statutory homelessness services?
• Implications of Work Programme for prime contractor model in other public services?
Next Steps – Taking Stock of Commissioning & Procurement Procurement and Commissioning practices and TSO responses
will influence the future shape of the sector and largely determine the impact of TSOs on public services - therefore a
key research priority
• Growing questions around outcome-based policy and delivery• Key role of Payment by Results (employment, mental health,
offenders, fostering and adoption, etc.)• Impact of national commissioning and scale/efficiency
approach on local relationships (housing)• Update, overview and policy analysis of procurement agenda
final contribution of Service Delivery stream
Thanks for Listening
Questions and Comments Welcome
David Mullins [email protected] Rees [email protected]
Rosie Meek [email protected]