Upload
rcorai
View
66
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
AN OPTION TO INTEGRATE THE PRINCIPLES OF OPEN EDUCATION IN LATIN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES
Citation preview
A N O P T I O N T O I N T E G R A T E T H E P R I N C I P L E S O F O P E N E D U C A T I O N I N L A T I N A M E R I C A N U N I V E R S I T I E S
O P O R T U N I D A D P R O J E C T :
D I A N A H E R N Á N D E Z U N I V E R S I D A D E S T A T A L A D I S T A N C I A ( U N E D )
C O S T A R I C A
C O S T A R I C A
OCW UNED courses images
O P O R T U N I D A D P R O J E C T
• The OportUnidad project is co-funded by the European Commission with the participation of 12 universities (4 in Europe and 8 in Latin America).
• Objective: To bring the use of Open Education Resources (OER) closer to the educational practices in Latin American universities by developing a common higher education area between these two major sectors.
(Inamorato, Cobo, and Ferreira, 2012, p. 11).
U N E D , C O S T A R I C A
U N E D T O O P O R T U N I D A D
• Experience in projects from the European Commission.
• 36-year experience in distance learning.
• With a project OCW for 6 years.
R E S O U R C E S
O P O R T U N I D A D R E S O U R C E S
Some of the elements available are:
• Compendium of European and Latin American case studies and interviews on open educational resources and practices
• Regional Agenda
• Road Map
• The course PREA
C O M P E N D I U M
R E G I O N A L A G E N D A
R O A D M A P
W E B I N A R S
C O U R S E P R E A
C O U R S E P R E A
• It consists of 80 working hours.
• All the materials are available in Spanish and Portuguese.
• Ongoing assessment of evidence-based education.
• All course materials will be made available to the global community through a license granted by Creative Commons.
C O U R S E P R E A
• The course consists of 5 activities and some of them promote collaboration and participation:
1. Approach to OER and OEP
2. Analysis of the teaching practice
3. Adoption of OER
4. Openness and collaboration
5. Conclusion and projection
G R A P H 1 . E N R O L L M E N T O F T H E F I R S T E D I T I O N O F T H E P R E A C O U R S E , B Y N U M B E R O F P A R T I C I P A N T S E N R O L L E D P E R C O U N T R Y .
S O U R C E : H E R N Á N D E Z , S A N D O V A L , S A N D O V A L A N D V A L V E R D E ( 2 0 1 4 )
22
11
118
7
6
6
43
3 3
Mexico Costa Rica
Ecuador Brazil
Uruguay Colombia
Peru Argentina
Bolivia El Salvador
Venezuela
Total: 84 participants
G R A P H 2 . T O T A L B E N E F I T E D I N S T I T U T I O N S , D I S T R I B U T E D B Y C O U N T R Y .
S O U R C E : H E R N Á N D E Z E T A L . ( 2 0 1 4 )
18
73
3
3
3
3
32 1 1
MexicoBrazilArgentinaBoliviaColombiaCosta RicaEcuadorUruguayVenezuelaEl SalvadorPeru
Total: 47 institutions
G R A P H 3 . A P P R O A C H E S C O N S I D E R E D B Y P A R T I C I P A N T S I N T H E I R R O A D M A P S .
S O U R C E : H E R N Á N D E Z E T A L . ( 2 0 1 4 )
0
13
25
38
50
63
Pedagogical Technological Organizational Collaborative Business
Freq
uenc
ies
Approaches - Regional Agenda
G R A P H 4 . P E R S E V E R I N G P A R T I C I P A N T S I N E A C H A C T I V I T Y , B Y H O S T C O U N T R Y .
S O U R C E : H E R N Á N D E Z E T A L . ( 2 0 1 4 )
0
5
10
15
20
25
CostaRica
Mexico Bolivia Brazil Uruguay Ecuador Colombia Peru
Activ
e Pa
rtici
pant
s
Host Country
InitialAct 1Act 2Act 3Act 4Act 5
P L A T F O R M
Moderators and participants agreed that it was:
• Difficult to use.
• Lack of stability.
• Slow.
• Interaction spaces were “too many clicks away.”
I N T E R N A T I O N A L M O D E R A T I O N
Moderators and participants agreed that it was:
• Excellent
• Timely
• Educational
• Efficient
A S S E S S M E N T S
Moderators and participants said:
• They were well-developed but difficult to use.
• Appropriate and useful.
• They were demanding.
M E T H O D O L O G Y
• They liked the proposal; some made suggestions for improvement.
• It fit the course and their needs.
• Considering other assessment methods.
C O U R S E L E N G T H
• Almost everybody agreed that it was good, some said that it could be extended for 4 more weeks but some said it has to be shortened.
I M P R O V E M E N T I S A L W A Y S P O S S I B L E
• Encourage participants to finish the course through some sort of an additional commitment to participate in the course.
• Both participants and moderators suggested a balance between group and individual activities, they want more interaction among peers.
• More feedback for different activities, particularly, journals and assessment rubrics.
• Improve the guides, materials should use the vocabulary used in the country where the course will be taught.
R E F E R E N C E S
• Hernández, D., Sandoval, A., Sandoval, A. and Valverde, J. (2014). Informe de evaluación del curso Principios y estrategias de educación abierta para la innovación docente (PREA). San José: This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union.
• Inamorato, A., Cobo, C. and Ferreira, G. (2012). Compendium of European and Latin American case studies and interviews on open educational resources and practices. Retrieved from http://www.oportunidadproject.eu/resources/compendium
• OportUnidad. (2013). Curso PREA. Taken from: http://www.oportunidadproject.eu/resources/course-prea
C R E D I T A N D G R A T I T U D E
UNEDMario Badilla - Production and graphic design
OportUnidad Project
OpenCourseWare Consortium
C O N T A C T
DIANA HERNÁNDEZVICERRECTORÍA DE INVESTIGACIÓN
UNEDCOSTA RICA
Correos: [email protected] [email protected]
CC: Atribución, No comercial, Compartir igual