22
Our work here is done.... UK Summon Information Literacy Nov 2015 QMUL

Our Work Here is Done

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Our Work Here is Done

Our work here is done....UK Summon Information Literacy Nov 2015 QMUL

Page 2: Our Work Here is Done

….or is it?

Page 3: Our Work Here is Done
Page 4: Our Work Here is Done
Page 5: Our Work Here is Done

But…..

Page 6: Our Work Here is Done

“……nobody except librarians want to search, everyone else just

wants to find”

Page 7: Our Work Here is Done

• Digital Natives

• IT skills = IL skills

• Evaluating information

• New student skills

Page 8: Our Work Here is Done

Digital Natives are different

Page 9: Our Work Here is Done

IT skills = IL skills

Page 10: Our Work Here is Done

The Internet is like a…….

“Giant sweetshop, in which we behave like children,

grabbing all we can get with less regards for quality than

quantity”

Fieldhouse and Nicholas, 2008

Students do not evaluate information

Page 11: Our Work Here is Done

New students are information literate

Page 12: Our Work Here is Done

Academic perspective • Information overload

• Information skills

• Graduate of the future

• Potential of librarians

• Info literacy/academic literacy

• Limited view

Page 13: Our Work Here is Done

“I didn’t quite realise how little the students knew about the Internet

until we started doing stuff together and it’s become more and more

terrifying every single year that it’s not getting better what they are

coming in with”1st year Lecturer

Page 14: Our Work Here is Done

Our solutions

http://bit.ly/GamesMDX

Page 15: Our Work Here is Done

Final thoughts

Page 16: Our Work Here is Done
Page 18: Our Work Here is Done
Page 19: Our Work Here is Done

References• Asher, C. (2003). Separate but equal: Librarians, academics and information literacy. Australian Academic and

Research Libraries, 34 (1), pp.52-55.

• Badke, W. (2010). Why information literacy is invisible. Communications in Information Literacy, 4 (2), pp.129-141.

• Bennett, S., Maton, K., and Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), pp.775-786.

• Chen, K. and Lin, P. (2011). Information literacy in university library user education. Aslib Proceedings: new information perspectives, 63 (4), pp.399-418.

• CIBER. (2008). Information behaviour of the researchers of the future. UCL, London. Available at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf [Accessed 8th September 2014]

• Coonan, E. (2011). A new curriculum for information literacy curriculum: transitional, transferable, transformational – Theoretical background, Teaching learning: perceptions of information literacy. Cambridge University Library. Available at http://ccfil.pbworks.com/f/emma_report_final.pdf [Accessed 23rd November 2014]

• Dutton, W.H. and Helsper, E.J. (2007). The Internet in Britain: 2007. Oxford, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. Available at http://oxis.oii.ox.ac.uk/reports/ [Accessed: 29th December 2014]

• Fieldhouse, M. and Nicholas, D. (2008). Digital literacy as information savvy: the road to information literacy. In: Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (eds). Digital literacy: concepts, policies and practices. New York, Peter Lang Publishing Group, pp. 47-72.

• Head, A. (2012). Learning curve: How college graduates solve information problems once they join the workplace (Project Information Literacy Research Report). Available from http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_fall2012_workplacestudy_fullreport_revised.pdf [Accessed 11th June 2015]

• Head, A. (2013). Learning the ropes: How Freshmen conduct course research once they enter college (Project Information Literacy Research Report). Available from http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_2013_freshmenstudy_fullreport.pdf [Accessed 9th June 2015]

Page 20: Our Work Here is Done

• Head, A. and Eisenberg, M. (2010). Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age (Project Information Literacy Progress report). Available from http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_fall2010_survey_fullreport1.pdf [Accessed 11th June 2015]

• Helsper, E. J., and Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36 (3), pp. 503-520.

• Holton, D. (2010). The Digital Natives/Digital Immigrants distinction is dead or at least dying . EdTechDev. Available at https://edtechdev.wordpress.com/2010/03/19/the-digital-natives-digital-immigrants-distinction-is-dead-or-at-least-dying/ [Accessed 9th June 2015]

• Jackson, M.G. (1999). Image and status: academic librarians and the new professionalism. Advances in Librarianship, 23 (1), pp.93-115.

• Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S. and Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or Digital Natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education, 54, pp.722-732.

• Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarnot, B. and Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, pp.332-343.

• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., and Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers and Education, 56, pp.429-440.

• Markess, S. (2009). A new conception of information literacy for the digital learning environment in higher education. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 1 (1). pp.25-40.

• McGuinness, C. (2006). What faculty think: Exploring the barriers to information literacy development in undergraduate education. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32 (6), pp.573-582.

• Norgaard, R. (2003). Writing information literacy: contributions to a concept. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 43 (2). pp.124-130.

• Orr, D., Appleton, M. and Wallin, M. (2001). Information literacy and flexible delivery: creating a conceptual framework and model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27 (6), pp.457-463.

Page 21: Our Work Here is Done

• Palfrey, J., and Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books, New York.

• Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5), pp.1-6.

• Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants: do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9 (6), pp.1-6.

• Prensky, M. (2009). H.Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. The Wisdom Page. Available from http://www.wisdompage.com/Prensky01.html [Accessed 9th June 2015]

• Silipigni Connaway, L. and Dickey, T. (2010). The digital information seeker: report of findings from selected OCLC, RIN and JISC user behaviour projects. JISC. Available at http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140615023510/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2010/digitalinformationseekerreport.pdf [Accessed 27th February 2015]

• Webber, S., Ford, N., Crowder, M. and Madden, A. (2013). Collaborating for deep critical information behaviour. Presented at: LILAC 2013, University of Manchester, UK. 25-27th March 2013. Available at http://www.slideshare.net/infolit_group/webber-ford-2013-18177230 [Accessed 11th September 2014]

• Weetman, J. (2005). Osmosis- does it work for the development of information literacy? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31 (5), pp.456-460.

• Weetman DaCosta, J. (2010). Is there an information literacy skills gap to be bridged? An examination of faculty perceptions and activities relating to information literacy in the United States and England. College and Research Libraries, 71 (3), pp.203-222. Available at http://derby.openrepository.com/derby/bitstream/10545/254393/1/C%26RL_May2010.pdf [Accessed 4th January 2015]

• White, D. and Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: a new typology for online engagement. First Monday: peer reviewed journal on the Internet, 16 (9). Available from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3171/3049 [Accessed 9th June 2015]

• Wright, F., White, D., Hirst, T. and cann, A. (2014). Visitors and residents: mapping student attitudes to academic use of social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 39 (1), pp.126-141.

Page 22: Our Work Here is Done

Photo credits:• Slide 1 http://www.bs757.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Tan.jpg

• Slide 2 http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/news/cyclone-pam-kills-8-flattens-pacific-islands-1.1832413#.VgVd2aRVhHw

• Slide 3 (clockwise from top left)http://library.oakland.edu/uploads/2014/02/librarytimeline_015.jpghttp://www.aadl.org/files/photos/1980periodicals.jpghttps://www.york.ac.uk/education/alumni/50/digital-archive/1980s/80s-photoshttps://www.york.ac.uk/education/alumni/50/digital-archive/1980s/80s-photos

• Slide 4 http://www.coupondunia.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Bungee_Jumping-1.jpeg

• Slide 5 http://www.creattor.com/files/71/4969/green-maze-screenshots-10.jpg

• Slide 6 http://lawlibrary.gsu.edu/files/2013/10/catalog-300x200.jpg

• Slide 7 https://www.tcd.ie/Library/about/exhibitions/wild-waves/ww_images/EPB-EX-08_106.jpg

• Slide 8 https://rcastle33.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/cartoon-you-can-read-all-about-it-on-my-blog-dad1.jpg

• Slide 9 https://t2.ftcdn.net/jpg/00/74/86/73/240_F_74867364_u1mmvxRx5xjb4NcnBSOdzqJjiZHTBQdw.jpg

• Slide 10 http://cdn1.cloudpro.co.uk/sites/cloudprod7/files/sweet%20shop.jpg

• Slide 11 https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/87/b0/6e/87b06e9ec1bd485c24b25dbbd55b2240.gif

• Slide 12 https://www.visitflam.com/globalassets/stegastein/stegatein_4.jpg?id=729

• Slide 13 http://www.flickr.com/photos/webtreatsetc/4869256777

• Slide 14 http://www.istockphoto.com/photo/roadsign-16721207?st=c5d1c26

• Slide 15 http://sambellsculptor.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/rodin2.jpg

• Slide 16 http://www.flickr.com/photos/naturalturn/3264726560

• Slide 17 Copyright Fotolia under Microsoft licence http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/images/results.aspx?qu=blank+sign&ex=1#ai:MP900442493

• Slide 18 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Question_mark_road_sign,_Australia.jpg