16
The number, form and genre of direct mail marketing and door to door political leafleting in the February 2013 Eastleigh by-election. Marcus Leaning University of Winchester

Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

The number, form and genre of direct mail marketing and

door to door political leafleting in the February

2013 Eastleigh by-election.

Marcus Leaning University of Winchester

Page 3: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Politics

• Constituency created in 1955.

• Held by Conservatives until 1994.

• David Chidgey won the in 1994 by-election following the death of Stephen Milligan.

• Chris Huhne held the seat in 2005.

• But was arrested and (eventually) pleaded guilty for ‘perverting the course of justice’ after getting his then wife to accept speeding points in 2003.

• Mike Thornton (Lib Dem) held the seat on the 28th Feb 2013.

Page 4: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Electoral Campaigning

• The Lib Dem victory was attributed to a ‘strong ground game’ – the mobilisation of lots of political activists to engage voters.

• This paper looks at one aspect of the campaign, the door to door leafleting.

• An important but (recently) less studied electoral campaigning technique.

Page 5: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

The impact of the local activist on electoral campaign performance

• Norris (2002) sees three periods in campaigning: Pre-modern, modern and post modern.

• Premodern were activist based, during the modern period the Nuffield Studies reported the futility of local activism in campaigns as elections are won or lost on national issues (Cutts, 2006a).

• Postmodern electioneering – that occurring post 1993 (Norris, 2000) is about ‘strategic targeting’.

• This has resulted in a revitalisation of local activism (Cutts, 2006b) underpinned by central party support that bolster constituency parties (Fisher and Denver, 2008).

• This requires lots of activists (Pattie and Johnston, 2009) and can overcome limited spending (Fisher, 2011).

• Door to door leafleting is a good barometer of local activism.• However the leaflets are not homogeneous and actually offer

further insight into local activism.

Page 6: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Method

• Consideration of all deliveries to one address over the campaign period.

• This was from the day of Huhne’s guilty plea (4th Feb), though the official declaration of candidates and official start of campaign (13th Feb) to the election day (28th Feb).

• In total 61 printed party political electoral communications were delivered from 11 of the 14 standing parties.

• Look at:– Number and frequency;– Type;– Discursive strategies

Page 7: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Number of door to door delivery by party

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1

Liberal Democrat

UKIP

Labour

Conservative

Independent

English Democrats

National HealthAction

Christian

Peace

TUSC

Wessex Regionalist

PARTY No. of communications Votes

Liberal Democrat 24 13,342

UKIP 13 11,571

Labour 7 4,088

Conservative 6 10,559

Independent 3 768

English Democrats 3 70

National Health Action 2 392

Christian 1 163

Peace 1 128

TUSC 1 62

Wessex Regionalist 1 30

Beer, Baccy and Crumpet 0 235

Monster Raving Loony 0 136

Elvis Loves Pets 0 72

Page 8: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Number of leaflets delivered by day

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 9: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Types of communication

• Can be considered by:– Financial cost to produce and deliver.

– Labour to produce and deliver.

– Mode of communication.

• 4 basic types of communication:– Leaflet

– Impersonal letter

– Personal letter / communication

– Pseudo magazine/newspaper

Page 10: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Leaflets

• Long heritage.

• The ‘base’ door to door political communication.

• Relatively cheap to produce but intensive to deliver – by activist.

• Tone is often ‘proclamatory’.

Page 11: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Impersonal letters

• In many ways similar to a leaflet – tend to be more issue focussed.

• Again relatively cheap to produce but intensive to deliver – by activists.

• Tone is ‘discursive’ or ‘conversational’.

Page 12: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Personal letter / communication

• Addressed to an individual.

• Explicit targeting.

• Variable costs to produce.

• Expensive / intensive to deliver- either• by Royal Mail -

candidates get one free delivery.

• Or on occasion by hand by activist.

Page 13: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Pseudo magazine/newspaper

• Mimicry or remediation of local newspaper or magazine.

• Visually distinct.

• Occasionally politically ‘camouflaged’.

• Expensive to produce.

• Intensive to deliver.

Page 14: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Type of communication by partyParty Leaflets

Activistdelivered

ImpersonalletterActivistdelivered

Personal letterPaid delivery

Pseudonewspaper magazine

Total Activistdelivered

Total Paid for delivery

Total

Liberal Democrat 15 6 (1 hand delivered) 3 19 5 24

UKIP 9 2 2 11 2 13

Labour 4 3 4 3 7

Conservative 1 2 3 4 2 6

Independent 3 3 3

English Democrats 3 3 3

National Health Action

2 2 2

Christian 1 1 1

Peace 1 1 1

TUSC 1 1 1

Wessex Regionalist

1 1 1

Page 15: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

Hmmm…

• Lib dems – lots of activism and lots spent.

• Ukip – lots of activism but not so much money.

• Labour – a bit of activism and a bit of money spent.

• Conservative – similar amount of activism but lots of money spent.

Page 16: Political leaflets in the Eastleigh 2013 by election

References

• Cutts, D. (2006a) Continuous campaigning and electoral outcomes: The Liberal Democrats in Bath. Political Geography, 25(1), 72-88.

• Cutts, D. (2006b) “Where We Work We Win”: A Case Study of Local Liberal Democrat Campaigning. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 16(3), 221-242.

• Fisher, J., Cutts, D. J. and Fieldhouse, E. (2011) ‘Constituency Campaigning in 2010’, in D. Wring , R. Mortimore and S. Atkinson (eds), Political Communication in Britain: The Leader Debates, the Campaign and the Media in the 2010 General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 198–217.

• Fisher, J. and Denver, D. (2008) From Foot-Slogging to Call Centres and Direct Mail: A Framework for Analyzing the Development of District-Level Campaigning,European Journal of Political Research, 47 (6), 794–826.

• Norris, P. (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in PostindustrialSocieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Pattie, C., & Johnston, R. (2009) Still Talking, But Is Anyone Listening?: The Changing Face of Constituency Campaigning in Britain, 1997—2005. Party Politics, 15(4), 411-434.