18
Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest soil Presented by REU Amos Lim Zhen Yu SUNY-ESF Senior year undergraduate

Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Summer Project

Citation preview

Page 1: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest soil

Presented by REU Amos Lim Zhen Yu

SUNY-ESFSenior year undergraduate

Page 2: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Introduction• Decomposition def-: Break down and decay of organic matter

• It affects the nutrients availability in the forest floor and soil

Recycled nutrients will be added to the forest floor and soil

• Potential carbon source in the forest. Beginning of food chains: Fungi/bacteria > worms > birds

• Main polymers in plant fiber including: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin.

Page 3: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Nutrients effect on decomposition

• In my project, I focus on relationships between decomposition rate and addition of nutrients including: Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), and Calcium (Ca) in the forest soil.

• Past studies shown P and Ca potentially accelerate the decomposition but not the extent of decomposition (Reid 1983).

Page 4: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Nitrogen and decomposition

• Nitrogen (N) causes inhibition of plant fiber degradation, called N-repression.

Page 5: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Nitrogen and decomposition

Page 6: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Some complexity in decomposition

• Different N source can have extremely different effect

• Example: Different N effect on white rot fungi Phanerochaete chrysosporiumt decomposition

Urea supplements (1% added N) strongly inhibited lignin degradation and weight loss.

The complex nitrogen sources peptone stimulated lignin degradation and weight loss.

NH4Cl had intermediate effects.

Page 7: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

What is available in Bartlett Experimental Forest?

• Different stand ageYoung (age ~20), Old ( ~120)

• Fertilized plotsN, P, N+P and Control in each stand

We have one Ca plot in each young and old stand

Page 8: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Methods

• I compare the decomposition rate of fertilized plots and the control plots to see the differences.

Page 9: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Methods

• I chose to look at decomposition using filter paper and popsicle sticks.

The cellulose and lignin in daily life

~1.03g ~ 1.3±0.3 g

Page 10: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Duration for my studies

I will bury and retrieve it after 3 months

Weight lost over 3 months period tell us the decomposition rate of cellulose.

Page 11: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Duration for my studies

I will bury and retrieve it in a year or 2 year period.

Weight lost over time tell us the decomposition rate of lignin.

Page 12: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Systematic locations

Page 13: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Hypothesis

• I hypothesize that the cellulose/lignin decomposition rate would be lower when concentration of Nitrogen is higher in the microenvironment of the cellulose/lignin. The cellulose/lignin decomposition rate would be higher when concentration of Ca is higher in the microenvironment of the cellulose/lignin. Therefore I expect to see significantly lower decomposition in N, and N+P fertilized stands in the end of the studies. Where the Ca and P does not affect the decomposition result.

Page 14: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Hypothesis

Higher Nitrogen concentration → lower decomposition

Higher Phosphorus concentration → higher decomposition

Higher in Both Nitrogen and Phosphorus →lower

Higher Ca concentration → higher decomposition

Page 15: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Some other problems in the past studies

• Decomposition rate varies a lot. • Decomposition takes a LONG time.• Decomposition related to microenvironment. • Microorganism involved in decomposition is

not well studied enough for us to understand decomposition process.

Page 16: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Importance of my project

• To study decomposition with limited funding.

• To give us directions on future studies.

• To see if there’s a general pattern in our experimental forest.

Page 17: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

Acknowledgement

• All the Phd titled, in ShoeString Project• And all the rootmates.

& Russell

Page 18: Popsicle sticks and filter paper decomposition in forest v2

References• Berg, B., & Laskowski R. (2006). Advances in Ecological

Research Volume 38: Litter decomposition: A guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. San Diego: Elseview Academic Press.

• Binkley, D. (1983). Does Forest Removal Increase Rates of Decomposition and Nitrogen Release?. Amsterdam, The Netherland: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.. For. Ecol. Manag., 229-233.

• Reid, I., D. (1983). Effects of Nitrogen Supplements on Degradation Wood Lignin and Carbohydrate Components by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Applied and Environmental microbiology,.. 830-837.