18
Court of the Future: Courthouse for problem solving courts – HiiL innovating justice SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM IN COURT Ashley Bennet I Melvin Kaersenhout I Laurens Mol I Elsbeth Ronner I Judith Schotanus I Laura Vellinga

problem solving court of the future

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This team focussed upon courts that aim to help people solve their problems. “We imagine a large glass greenhouse, open to the public, located at the site of the current Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which will soon need a new function,” states architect Judith Schotanus. Team member Elsbeth Ronner adds: “All the courtrooms and public spaces are designed to stimulate social interaction and dialogue. We also provide judges with the possibility to influence the physical space according to the needs of a case. For example, a judge will have the ability to make a room smaller in order to put pressure on the parties to reach an agreement.”

Citation preview

Page 1: problem solving court of the future

Court of the Future: Courthouse for problem solving courts – HiiL innovating justice

SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM IN COURT

Ashley Bennet I Melvin Kaersenhout I Laurens Mol I Elsbeth Ronner I Judith Schotanus I Laura Vellinga

Page 2: problem solving court of the future

1 Punitive2 Case centric

3 Content4 Focus on difference

5 Decisive judge6 Two parties

7 Focus on the past

1 Solvative2 People centric

3 Context4 Focus on interest5 Facilitating judge

6 Multiple stakeholders7 Focus on the future

PROBLEM SOVING PROCESS

Legal approach Problem solving

Page 3: problem solving court of the future

A problem solving process is public, led by a judge and not without obligations

PROBLEM SOVING COURT

Page 4: problem solving court of the future

PROBLEM SOLVING COURT IS PART OF PUBLIC SOCIETY

Decentralised system• Courthouse• Court on location• Judge to the problem

Page 5: problem solving court of the future

Legal approach Problem solving

PEOPLE IN CONFLICT ARE CENTRAL

Page 6: problem solving court of the future

• Parties facing each other• No specific entrances• Less emphasis on judge

Legal approach Problem solving

DIALOGUE DEFINES THE COURTROOM

Page 7: problem solving court of the future

PROBLEM IS NOT LIMITED TO COURTROOM

• Differentiated places to meet and work

Legal approach Problem solving

Page 8: problem solving court of the future

THE COURT IS A PUBLIC BUILDING

• All parties use the same public areas

• Separate buildings for court and offices

• No commercial functions

Legal approach Problem solving

Page 9: problem solving court of the future

COURTHOUSE IS A DISTINCTIVE PUBLIC BUILDING

The Hague: plot of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Page 10: problem solving court of the future

Axo

INFORMAL PUBLIC SPACE IS CENTRAL

Page 11: problem solving court of the future

PUBLIC SPACE IS CENTRAL

Page 12: problem solving court of the future

IDENTITY: FORMAL IN A FRIENDLY WAY

Page 13: problem solving court of the future

PUBLIC SPACE FOR INFORMAL USE

Page 14: problem solving court of the future

PUBLIC SPACE STIMULATES DIALOGUE

Page 15: problem solving court of the future

• Circular setup• Movable chairs: judge can adjust

distance between parties• Various dimensions by curtain

DIALOGUE DEFINES THE COURTROOM

Page 16: problem solving court of the future

ADDED VALUE

The judge derives his authority by solving the problem in a fair and thorough manner.

Page 17: problem solving court of the future

QUESTIONS

Page 18: problem solving court of the future

Manifestation Court of the Future: Design for a Courthouse for problem solving courts

HiiL innovating justice I Platform GRAS Also made possible by Stimuleringsfonds Creatieve Industrie

Team:

Ashley Bennet - PhilosopherMelvin Kaersenhout - Architect Laurens Mol - LawyerElsbeth Ronner - ArchitectJudith Schotanus - Architect I Urban SociologistLaura Vellinga - Interior Architect

SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM IN COURT