View
1.426
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Prof. dr. Betty CollisEDEN Research Workshop, 26 October 2006, Castelldefels, Spain
Citation preview
Quality on line: What and how should we be measuring for
quality assurance in learning?
Prof. dr. Betty CollisEDEN Research Workshop, 26 October 2006,
Castelldefels, Spain
Moonen & Collis Learning Technology [email protected]
Emeritus professor, University of [email protected]
Quality?
From whose perspective? Against what criteria? What do you do with what you find?
An illustration from practice
From whose perspective?
Institutional perspective?
Institutional perspective
Benchmarking:Self-improvement tool for
organizations Compare with others and/or reflect
internally Review comparative strengths &
weaknesses Identify possible routes to
improvement Rather than statistical indicators
of results (completion rates, unit costs, etc), focus on processes by which results are achieved
Accreditation reviewsExternal review body
• For licensing
• For comparisons among institutions
• Implications for funding
Items are typically responded to on a scale, with labels corresponding to 0=Not applicable, 1= No information available, 2=Not adequate, 3=Partly adequate, 4=Largely adequate, 5=Fully adequate, 6=Best practices processes
http://www.insight.strath.ac.uk/projects/risk/index.htm
How might external funding policies affect your e-learning strategy?
What are the objectives of your investment in e-learning? (ie., widening access?)
How are working practices and staff roles being affected? What are students’ expectations?
What structures are in place to support students? Staff?
Should you make, buy, update, or change?
How do your students access e-learning technologies and resources?
Is your curriculum development being affected by e-learning?
How is the quality of (e)-learning being monitored?
http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/index.shtml
How can Institutions help teaching staff to be more successful in their use of technology to support student learning?
Source: S. Marchall, (2005). New Zealand E-Learning Capability Determination. Available at
http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/Presentations.shtml
Learner perspective?
Example:
Student perceptions (5-pt scale) of: Flexibility Responsiveness and support Learning Participation/interaction Usefulness and ease of use of technology Overall satisfaction
McGorry, S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet & Higher Education, 6, 159-177
http://www1.tqi.ac.uk/sites/tqi/home/index.cfm
Content perspective?
Content, assembly, metadata, standards
Output oriented
One set of stakeholders may have one (implicit) view on quality
Output oriented
Infrastructure (to achieve output goal)
Another set of stakeholders may have a different view on quality
Learning-process oriented
And some perspectives may not get represented in these clusters…
(Personal) processes?
Theory oriented?
Or may not be fully taken up in the quality priorities of other clusters
Content, assembly, metadata, standards
Thus quality reflects the perspective
The challenge: Try to combine the perspectives
Example of an integrated evaluation approach in a corporate learning context
Collaborative learning
Shell EP Learning Centre
Collis, B., Bianco, M., Margaryan, A., & Waring, B. (2005). Putting blended learning to work: A case study from a multinational oil company. Education, Communication and Information, 5(3), 233-250.
Overall company impact & alignment
Multinational knowledge sharing
Supervisor engagement
Workplace learning, learning- environment design
Merrill’s Principles of instruction
Capture, reuse, from the business and from participant contributions
Competence framework
Participant assessment
LMS, VLE for strategic/pedagogic goals
Shell: overall company
Work-based activities
As part of an integrated approach: Generic principles of learning
“Learning is promoted when: Learners are engaged in solving real-world [i.e., business-
relevant] problems. Existing knowledge [in the learner or in his or her workplace] is
activated as a foundation for new knowledge. New knowledge is demonstrated to the learner [through seeing
it in action in the workplace]. New knowledge is applied by the learner [to his or her current
workplace situation]. New knowledge in integrated into the learner’s world
[workplace].” (Merrill, 2002, pp. 44-45, augmented with linkages relating to
the corporate context)
Collis, B., & Margaryan, A. (2005). Design criteria for work-based learning: Merrill's First Principles of Instruction expanded. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 725-738.
Merrill, D. (2003). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.
Regardless of the context, an approach for quality should include Merrill’s “first principles of instruction”
Merrill’s five first principles of instruction
And finally, what to do with the results?
Use an action research approach to integrate strategic planning, stimulating, implementing, monitoring and interpreting quality
Action research
For further ideas:Prof. dr. Betty Collis & Prof. dr. Jef Moonen
Moonen & Collis Learning Technology Consultants, BVhttp://bettycollisjefmoonen.nl
Footnote: This talk is not related to the report: “Quality on the Line” which is a benchmarking study
Quality On the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance EducationBy: Ronald Phipps, Jamie Merisotis, 2000; Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington DChttp://www.ihep.com/organizations.php3?action=printContentItem&orgid=104&typeID=906&itemID=9239&templateID=1422