20
Reviewing learning designs with HEART A learning design support strategy DONALD, C., BLAKE, A., GIRAULT, I., DATT, A. & RAMSAY, E. (2009). Approaches to learning design: past the head and the han ds to the HEART of the matter . Distance Education, 30, (2), pp.179-199.

Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

HEART (HEaring And Realising Teaching voice) is a learning design support strategy for teachers and learning designers involved in planning, developing or reviewing course (or learning) designs. The strategy helps users to elicit and visualise what we have called the 'teaching voice'; that is, the confluence of teaching beliefs and educational practice in the form of pedagogical dimensions. The HEART strategy involves using a questionnaire that addresses these pedagogical dimensions, a visualisation tool, and facilitated face-to-face and online discussion. It can be used in a variety of course or resource development stages (e.g. planning, design, or review), either collaboratively between course lecturers and learning designers, by individual teachers or learning designers, or by a teaching programme team. Once the questionnaire is completed, the results are submitted directly to the visualisation tool. The visual representations illustrate the pedagogical dimensions of the course or learning design. Currently we are trialling different visual representations and dimensions, including the 'bubble chart' you see above. For more information, see: cloudworks.ac.uk/index.php/cloud/view/2769 Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Citation preview

Page 1: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Reviewing learning designs with HEARTA learning design support strategy

DONALD, C., BLAKE, A., GIRAULT, I., DATT, A. & RAMSAY, E. (2009). Approaches to learning design: past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter. Distance Education, 30, (2), pp.179-199.

Page 2: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Why HEART?Why HEART?

Page 3: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

The origins of HEART HEaring And Realising Teaching-voice

learning designer - teacher collaboration: the voices of each may be more or less ‘audible’ in the final design output

Project teams often have discordant voices eLearning development may be expedited if

we can harmonise (‘sing from the same page’)

Choices in pedagogical strategies and reuse of learning designs will be more effective if we can discern our own voice and project it into practice

Page 4: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

‘Teaching voice’

“the middle ground of educational design is 'the difficult territory in which philosophy and pedagogical tactics have to be aligned' (Goodyear, 2005, p. 85). This is where belief and practice converge, or where pedagogical beliefs find voice as pedagogical practice. It is this confluence of belief and practice that we have termed teaching voice.”

Donald et al., 2009, p. 184

Page 5: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

The power of beliefs over practice

“Knowledge systems are open to evaluation and critical examination; beliefs are not … And yet, for all their idiosyncrasies … beliefs are far more influential than knowledge in determining how individuals organize and define tasks and problems and are stronger predictors of behavior.”

Pajares, 1992, p. 311

Page 6: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Belief/practice dimensions

“…we believe that more research-led academic staff development is needed in the CAL area. One approach worth further investigation would involve academic teachers coding their own beliefs and practices in sessions facilitated by staff developers, and then deciding how they might incorporate technology into their framework so as to enhance student learning.”

Bain & McNaught, 2006, p. 112

Page 7: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Reconciling teacher beliefs, learning design and technology integration

Does your learning design reflect your pedagogical vision?

“To negotiate … technology environments and create effective learning designs, teachers require opportunities to resolve tensions across their own belief systems…. to articulate their pedagogical beliefs and beliefs about technologies ...”

Steel, 2009, p. 417

Page 8: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

How can HEART help?How can HEART help?

Page 9: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

HEART:HEaring And Realising Teaching-voice

Page 10: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

What is HEART ‘measuring’?

Page 11: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

How might we use HEART?

Page 12: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

HEART in (prototype) practice

Social network (Elgg/Cloudworks)

IBM ‘Many Eyes’ software

Google Docs

Social network

Page 13: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Taking the pulse of a learning designTaking the pulse of a learning design

Page 14: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Entering the social network…

Page 15: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Completing the questionnaire…

Page 16: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Question format…

Page 17: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Accessing the results…

Page 18: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Pedagogical dimensions as a bubble chart…

Page 19: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Pedagogical dimensionsas a treemap…

Page 20: Reviewing Learning Designs With HEART - September 2010

Ongoing development

Recent trial with 12 learning designers at University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji

Pending trials with staff at University of Waikato and additional staff at University of Auckland, NZ

Information Systems PhD student developing custom database and visualisation options

Validating questionnaire, or locating one ‘off the shelf’? Options other than student/teacher-centred?

Trial online (distance) use, project team use, and social network implementation (Cloudworks)

Seek further collaboration with other researchers.