Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
o The Goal is to provide safe, comfortable, sustainable and
creative spaces for students and early learners to achieve
success
o To achieve this, students, teachers, parents, school divisions and
community members will be involved in the core design through
the 3P process
o Nine joint-use schools in high growth areas:
•
•
•
•
o Schools expected to open Fall 2017 - requires Spring 2014
procurement
o Jan–May 2014 – Due diligence and LEAN 3P
•
•
o June–Aug 2014 – Request For Qualifications (RFQ)
o Sept 2014–July 2015 – Request For Proposal (RFP) and Financial Close
o July 2015–June 2017 – Construction
o June–August 2017 – Transition
o Fall 2017 – Schools open
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o Procurement process decision (P3 vs. Traditional)
o Develop RFQ, RFP and Project Agreement documentation
o Financial close
o Construction and commissioning site preparation work
o Construction
o Commissioning
o Preparation for school opening & operation
o Schools open
Provide benefits for students where specific programming may not
have been otherwise offered
Short-term and long-term maintenance costs could be shared
reducing overall cost for each school board
Potential to strengthen partnerships between school divisions
Provides equitable facilities
Improves efficiencies in construction
Significant time savings
Meets provincial standards and guidelines
Adaptable to suit unique needs where needed
Supports Student First
o Core Design informed by LEAN 3P: Production/Preparation/Process
o Involves students, teachers, parents, school divisions, caretakers and
community members in the core school design
o Goal is to ensure quality, safety, flow and efficiencies to provide the
best learning environment
o Design may be modified to meet local needs
o Land certainty
o All issues and costs known
o Ownership strategy to resolve by financial close
o Public sector procurement methodology
o Design, Build, Finance and/or Operate, Maintain
o Innovation competition
o Lifecycle of the asset
o Rapid growth = increasing demand for new infrastructure to
support economic growth and improved quality of life
o Balanced budget context
o Superior procurement methodology (on-time, on-budget, with
value for money)
14
o Traditional build is the right approach for majority of projects ~80+%
o P3s an option for large/complex projects in the $100+ million range
o P3s widely used and well established in Canada and internationally
15
o Compare traditional approach to P3 approach taking into
consideration the lifecycle of the asset
o Must be value for money and other factors confirmed in due diligence
18
Due
Diligence
RFQ
Issue RFP
Issue
Proponent
Evaluation
and Partner
Selection
Construct
Government
Approval
Proponent short-list and 1st
Fairness Advisor Report released
Value for Money Report and 2nd
Fairness Advisor Report released
Market sounding to test
interest and get feedback
Projects:
9 Joint-use schools
Projects:
Swift Current Long-Term Care Centre
Government
Approval &
Agreement Signed
P3 Advisors
Retained
VFM
Confirmed
Assessment and Procurement Process
X Cost more
X Quality is compromised
X Hurt local construction sector
X Privatization
X Allow government to avoid debt
X Shrouded in secrecy
X Lead to public sector job loss
19
Value for money for taxpayers
On-time delivery and cost certainty - performance-based contracts
Long-term warranty on infrastructure – e.g. 30 years
Expedite priority infrastructure rather than deferring to future
Opportunity for innovation
Public sector retains ownership and directs service delivery
20
o Education ministry leads design process and technical work
o SaskBuilds leads review of P3 financing and development options
(with expert advisors)
o School divisions involved throughout the process
o Government decides core design and procurement method
