57
Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities 1 Payam Barnaghi Institute for Communication Systems (ICS) University of Surrey Guildford, United Kingdom MyIoT Week Malaysia 2015, MIMOS Berhad Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, August 2015

Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

1

Payam BarnaghiInstitute for Communication Systems (ICS)University of SurreyGuildford, United Kingdom

MyIoT Week Malaysia 2015, MIMOS Berhad Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, August 2015

Page 2: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

The Internet of Things (IoT)

2P. Barnaghi et al., "Digital Technology Adoption in the Smart Built Environment", IET Sector Technical Briefing, The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), I. Borthwick (editor), March 2015.

Page 3: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Real world data

3

Page 4: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Data in the IoT

− Data is collected by sensory devices and also crowd sensing sources.

− It is time and location dependent.− It can be noisy and the quality can vary. − It is often continuous - streaming data.

− There are several important issues such as:− Device/network management− Actuation and feedback (command and control)− Resource, service and entity descriptions.

Page 5: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

IoT data- challenges

− Multi-modal, distributed and heterogeneous− Noisy and incomplete− Time and location dependent − Dynamic and varies in quality − Crowdsourced data can be unreliable − Requires (near-) real-time analysis− Privacy and security are important issues− Data can be biased- we need to know our data!

5P. Barnaghi, A. Sheth, C. Henson, "From data to actionable knowledge: Big Data Challenges in the Web of Things," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.28 , issue.6, Dec 2013.

Page 6: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Internet of Things: The story so far

RFID based solutions Wireless Sensor and

Actuator networks, solutions for

communication technologies,

energy efficiency, routing, …

Smart Devices/Web-enabled

Apps/Services, initial products,

vertical applications, early concepts and

demos, …

Motion sensor

Motion sensor

ECG sensor

Physical-Cyber-Social Systems, Linked-data,

semantics, M2M, More products, more

heterogeneity, solutions for control and

monitoring, …

Future: Cloud, Big (IoT) Data Analytics, Interoperability, Enhanced Cellular/Wireless

Com. for IoT, Real-world operational use-cases and

Industry and B2B services/applications,

more Standards…

Page 7: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Scale of the problem

7

Things Data

Devices

2.5 quintillion bytes per day

Billions and Billions of them…

Estimated 50 Billion by 2020

Page 8: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Device/Data interoperability

8The slide is adapted from the IoT talk given by Jan Holler of Ericsson at IoT Week 2015 in Lisbon.

Page 9: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Heterogeneity, multi-modality and volume are among the key issues.

We need interoperable and machine-interpretable solutions…

9

Page 10: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

10

Page 11: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

11

But why do we still not have fully integrated semantic solutions in the IoT?

Page 12: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

A bit of history

− “The Semantic Web is an extension of the current web in which information is given well-defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in co-operation.“ (Tim Berners-Lee et al, 2001)

12Image source: Miller 2004

Page 13: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Semantics & the IoT

− The Semantic Sensor (&Actuator) Web is an extension of the current Web/Internet in which information is given well-defined meaning, better enabling objects, devices and people to work in co-operation and to also enable autonomous interactions between devices and/or objects.

13

Page 14: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Semantic Descriptions in Semantic (Web) World

14

Page 15: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Semantic Web these days…

15

Page 16: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

16

The world of IoT and Semantics

Page 17: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

17

Some good existing models: SSN Ontology

Ontology Link: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/ssnx/ssnM. Compton, P. Barnaghi, L. Bermudez, et al, "The SSN Ontology of the W3C Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group", Journal of Web Semantics, 2012.

Page 18: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Semantic Sensor Web

18

“The semantic sensor Web enables interoperability and advanced analytics for situation awareness and other advanced applications from heterogeneous sensors.” (Amit Sheth et al., 2008)

Page 19: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Several ontologies and description models

19

Page 20: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

20

We have good models and description frameworks;

The problem is that having good models and developing ontologies is not enough.

Page 21: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

21

Semantic descriptions are intermediary solutions, not the end product.

They should be transparent to the end-user and probably to the data producer as well.

Page 22: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

A WoT/IoT Framework

WSN

WSN

WSN

WSNWSN

Network-enabled Devices

Semantically annotate data

22

GatewayCoAP

HTTP

CoAP

CoAP

HTTP

6LowPAN

Semantically annotate data

http://mynet1/snodeA23/readTemp?

WSNMQTT

MQTT

Gateway

And several other protocols and solutions…

Page 23: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Publishing Semantic annotations

− We need a model (ontology) – this is often the easy part for a single application.

− Interoperability between the models is a big issue.

− Express-ability vs Complexity is a challenge

− How and where to add the semantics− Where to publish and store them− Semantic descriptions for data, streams, devices

(resources) and entities that are represented by the devices, and description of the services.

23

Page 24: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

24

Simplicity can be very useful…

Page 25: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

HyperCAT

25Source: Toby Jaffey, HyperCat Consortium, http://www.hypercat.io/standard.html

- Servers provide catalogues of resources toclients.

- A catalogue is an array of URIs.- Each resource in the catalogue is annotatedwith metadata (RDF-like triples).

Page 26: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Hyper/CAT model

26Source: Toby Jaffey, HyperCat Consortium, http://www.hypercat.io/standard.html

Page 27: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

27

Complex models are (sometimes) good for publishing research papers….

But they are often difficult to implement and use in large-scale and in real world products.

Page 28: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

What happens afterwards is more important

− How to index and query the annotated data− How to make the publication suitable for

constrained environments and/or allow them to scale

− How to query them (considering the fact that here we are dealing with live data and often reducing the processing time and latency is crucial)

− Linking to other sources

28

Page 29: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

The IoT is a dynamic, online and rapidly changing world

29

isPartOf

Annotation for the (Semantic) Web

Annotation for the IoT

Image sources: ABC Australia and 2dolphins.com

Page 30: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Make your model fairly simple and modular

30

SSNO model

Page 31: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Tools and APIs

31P. Barnaghi, M. Presser, K. Moessner, "Publishing Linked Sensor Data", in Proc. of the 3rd Int. Workshop onSemantic Sensor Networks (SSN), ISWC2010, 2010.

http://iot.ee.surrey.ac.uk

Page 32: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

32

Creating common vocabularies and taxonomies are also equally important e.g. Event and unit vocabluaries.

Page 33: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

33

We should accept the fact that sometimes we do not need (full) semantic descriptions.

Think of the applications and use-cases before starting to annotate the data.

Page 34: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

An example: a discovery method in the IoT

time

location

type

Query formulating

[#location | #type | time]

Discovery ID

Discovery/DHT Server

Data repository(archived data)

#location#type

#location#type

#location#type

Data hypercube

Gateway

Core network

Network ConnectionLogical Connection

Data

Page 35: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

An example: a discovery method in the IoT

35S. A. Hoseinitabatabaei, P. Barnaghi, C. Wang, R. Tafazolli, L. Dong, "A Distributed Data Discovery Mechanism for the Internet of Things", US Patents, 2015.

Page 36: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

An example: a discovery method in the IoT

36S. A. Hoseinitabatabaei, P. Barnaghi, C. Wang, R. Tafazolli, L. Dong, "A Distributed Data Discovery Mechanism for the Internet of Things", US Patents, 2015.

Page 37: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

101 Smart city use-case scenarios

http://www.ict-citypulse.eu/page/content/smart-city-use-cases-and-requirements

Page 38: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

38

Semantic descriptions can be fairly static on the Web;

In the IoT, the meaning of data and the annotations can change over time/space…

Page 39: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Static Semantics

39

Page 40: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Dynamic Semantics

<iot:measurement><iot:type> temp</iot:type><iot:unit>Celsius</iot:unit><time>12:30:23UTC</time><iot:accuracy>80%</iot:accuracy><loc:long>51.2365<loc:lat><loc:lat>0.5703</loc:lat></iot:measurment>

40

But this could be a function of time and

location;

What would be the accuracy 5 seconds

after the measurement?

Page 41: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Dynamic annotations for data in the process chain

41S. Kolozali et al, A Knowledge-based Approach for Real-Time IoT Data Stream Annotation and Processing", iThings 2014, 2014.

Page 42: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Dynamic annotations for provenance data

42S. Kolozali et al, A Knowledge-based Approach for Real-Time IoT Data Stream Annotation and Processing", iThings 2014, 2014.

Page 43: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

43

Semantic descriptions can also be learned and created automatically.

Page 44: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Extraction of events and semantics from social media

44

City Infrastructure

Tweets from a city

https://osf.io/b4q2t/

Pramod Anantharam, Payam Barnaghi, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, Amit P Sheth, "Extracting City Traffic Events from Social Streams", ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2015

Page 45: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Ontology learning from real world data

45Frieder Ganz, Payam Barnaghi, Francois Carrez, "Automated Semantic Knowledge Acquisition from Sensor Data", IEEE Systems Journal, 2014.

Page 46: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Overall, we need semantic technologies in the IoT and these play a key role in providing interoperability.

Page 47: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

However, we should design and use the semantics carefully andconsider the constraints and dynamicity of the IoT environments.

Page 48: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

An IoT framework

WSN

WSN

WSN

WSNWSN

Network-enabled Devices

Network-enabled Devices

Network services/storag

e and processing

units

Data/service access at

application level

Data collections and processing

within the networks

Query/access

to raw dataOr

Higher-level abstractions

GW

GW

GWData streams

Page 49: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

IoTLite Ontology

49http://iot.ee.surrey.ac.uk/fiware/ontologies/iot-lite

Page 50: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Reference Datasets

50http://iot.ee.surrey.ac.uk:8080/datasets.html

Page 51: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Importance of complementary data

51

Page 52: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

#1: Design for large-scale and provide tools and APIs.

#2: Think of who will use the semantics and how when you design your models.

#3: Provide means to update and change the semantic annotations.

52

Page 53: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

#4: Create tools for validation and interoperability testing.

#5: Create taxonomies and vocabularies.

#6: Of course you can always create a better model, but try to re-use existing ones as much as you can.

53

Page 54: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

#7: Link your data and descriptions to other existing resources.

#8: Define rules and/or best practices for providing the values for each attribute.

#9: Remember the widely used semantic descriptions on the Web are simple ones like FOAF.

54

Page 55: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

#10: Semantics are only one part of the solution and often not the end-product so the focus of the design should be on creating effective methods, tools and APIs to handle and process the semantics.

Query methods, machine learning, reasoning and data analysis techniques and methods should be able to effectively use these semantics.

55

In Conclusion

Page 56: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

W3C working group on spatial data on the Web

56http://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/

Page 57: Semantic Technologies for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities

Q&A

− Thank you.

http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/P.Barnaghi/

@pbarnaghi

[email protected]