32
Sepsis and Septic Shock Akram M Fayed, MD, ABIM Lecturer, Department of Critical Care Medicine Faculty of Medicine University of Alexandria Pharmacotherapy 2008. S. LENA KANG-BIRKEN AND JOSEPH T. DIPIRO

Sepsis and septic shock

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis and Septic Shock

Akram M Fayed, MD, ABIM

Lecturer, Department of Critical Care Medicine Faculty of Medicine

University of Alexandria

Pharmacotherapy 2008. S. LENA KANG-BIRKEN AND JOSEPH T. DIPIRO

Page 2: Sepsis and septic shock

Prevalence and Incidence

Sepsis represents a significant burden to the national health caresystem

In 2000, sepsis affected approximately 660,000 people, anincrease of 8.7 % per year since 1979

More than one-half of the patients were admitted to the ICU with amean length of stay of 15.7 days

Page 3: Sepsis and septic shock

Prevalence and Incidence

The total number of deaths increased from 21.9 per 100,000population in 1979 to 43.9 per 100,000 populations in 2000

With the annual cost of approximately $16.7 billion, there remains a vital need for clinicians to comprehend the pathophysiology and toappreciate the management options available for acutely ill patientswith sepsis or septic shock

Page 4: Sepsis and septic shock

Definition

The criteria for the new terms provide specific physiologic variablesthat can be used to categorize a patient as having:

-Bacteremia, - Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), - sepsis, - severe sepsis, - septic shock, or - multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS),

Suggesting an important continuum of progressive physiologic decline

Page 5: Sepsis and septic shock

Definition

Page 6: Sepsis and septic shock

Definition

Introduction of the term SIRS reflects the knowledge that aphysiologically similar systemic inflammatory response can be seeneven in the absence of identifiable infection

Severe sepsis refers to patients with an acute organ dysfunction suchas acute renal failure or respiratory failure

These patients have a mortality rate of approximately 40%

Page 7: Sepsis and septic shock

Definition

Septic shock refers to sepsis patients with arterial hypotension thatis refractory to adequate fluid resuscitation, thus requiring vasopressoradministration

These patients usually require intensive care and ultimately die in 50% to 80% of cases

It is important to note that progression from sepsis to MODS can occur in the absence of an intervening period of septic shock

Page 8: Sepsis and septic shock

Definition

Page 9: Sepsis and septic shock

INFECTION SITES AND PATHOGENS

The leading primary sites of microbiologically documented infectionsthat led to sepsis were:- The respiratory tract (21%–68%), - Intraabdominal space (14%–22%), and - Urinary tract (14%–18%)

Although almost any microorganism can be associated with sepsisand septic shock, the most common etiologic pathogens are: - Gram-positive bacteria (40% of patients), followed by - Gram-negative bacteria (38%) and - Fungi (17%)

Certain viruses and rickettsiae can produce a similar syndrome

Page 10: Sepsis and septic shock

GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIAL SEPSIS

Since 1987, gram-positive organisms are the predominant Pathogens in sepsis and septic shock, accounting for approximately40% to 50% of all cases

They are commonly caused by:- Staphylococcus aureus, - Streptococcus pneumoniae, - Coagulase-negative staphylococci,and - Enterococcus species.

Streptococcus pyogenes and viridans streptococci are lesscommonly involved

Page 11: Sepsis and septic shock

GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIAL SEPSIS

A greater proportion of patients with gram-negative bacteremiadevelop clinical sepsis, and gram-negative bacteria are also morelikely to produce septic shock in comparison to gram-positive organisms, 50% versus 25%, respectively

Gram-negative sepsis also results in a higher mortality rate compared with sepsis from any other groups of organisms

The major factor associated with the outcome of gram-negativesepsis appears to be the severity of any underlying condition

Page 12: Sepsis and septic shock

GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIAL SEPSIS

Patients with rapidly fatal conditions, such as acute leukemia, aplastic anemia, and >70% of the body’s surface burn injury, have asignificantly worse prognosis than do those patients with nonfatal underlying conditions, such as diabetes mellitus or chronic renal Insufficiency

Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most Commonly isolated gram-negative microorganisms in sepsis

Page 13: Sepsis and septic shock

GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIAL SEPSIS

Other common gram-negative pathogens include:

- Klebsiella species, - Serratia species, - Enterobacter species, and - Proteus species

P. aeruginosa, although not considered a predominant endogenous flora, is found widely in the environment and is the most frequent causeof sepsis fatality

Page 14: Sepsis and septic shock

ANAEROBIC AND MISCELLANEOUS BACTERIAL SEPSIS

Anaerobes are usually considered low-risk organisms for the development of sepsis

If present, anaerobes are often found together with other pathogenicbacteria that are commonly found in sepsis

Epidemiology reports suggested that polymicrobial infections accounted for 5% to 39% of sepsis

Page 15: Sepsis and septic shock

ANAEROBIC AND MISCELLANEOUS BACTERIAL SEPSIS

Mortality rates associated with polymicrobial infections are similar to sepsis caused by a single organism

Although some clinicians believe the particular combination oforganisms present in polymicrobial sepsis can provide clues to thesource of infection, no clear source for the infection can be identifiedin up to 25% of cases

Page 16: Sepsis and septic shock

FUNGAL SEPSIS

The rate of fungal infections increased more than 200% from1979 to 2000

Candida species are common causes of fungal sepsisin hospitalized patients

Although Candida albicans remains the most dominant species, non-albicans Candida species, particularly Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, and Candida krusei, have graduallyemerged from 24% in the 1980s to 46% during 1997 to 2000

Page 17: Sepsis and septic shock

CELLULAR COMPONENTS FOR INITIATING THE INFLAMMATORY PROCESS

Page 18: Sepsis and septic shock

PRO- AND ANTIINFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS

The balance between pro- and antiinflammatory mediators

(CARS, compensatory antiinflammatory response syndrome; IL, interleukin; IL-1RA, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; TNF-α , tumor necrosisfactor-α.)

Page 19: Sepsis and septic shock

PRO- AND ANTIINFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS

Cascades of sepsis

Page 20: Sepsis and septic shock

COMPLICATIONS

DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION

ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME

HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS

ACUTE RENAL FAILURE

Page 21: Sepsis and septic shock

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Page 22: Sepsis and septic shock

PROGNOSIS

As the patient progresses from SIRS to sepsis to severe sepsis toseptic shock, mortality increases in a stepwise fashion

Mortality rates are higher for patients with advanced age, preexistingdisease including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neoplasm, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, ICU care, more organfailure, positive blood cultures, and Pseudomonas species infection

Mortality increased with age from 10% in children to 38.4% in those ≥85 years

Page 23: Sepsis and septic shock

PROGNOSIS

ICU admission was required in 51.1% of the patients with severe sepsis and of those patients, mortality was reported in 34.1%

Mortality from severe sepsis and MODS is most closely related to thenumber of dysfunctioning organs

As the number of failing organs increased from two to five, mortalityincreased from 54% to 100%

Duration of organ dysfunction can also affect the overall mortality rate

Page 24: Sepsis and septic shock

PROGNOSIS

Page 25: Sepsis and septic shock

PROGNOSIS

An elevated lactate concentration of >4 mmol/L in the presenceof the SIRS significantly increases intensive care unit admissionrates, and persistent elevations in lactate for more than 24 hoursare associated with a mortality rate as high as 89%

Inversely, patients with higher lactate clearance after 6 hours ofEmergency Department intervention have improved outcome compared with those lower lactate clearance

There was an approximately 11% decrease likelihood of mortality for each 10% increase in lactate clearance

Page 26: Sepsis and septic shock

TREATMENT

Page 27: Sepsis and septic shock

TREATMENT

Page 28: Sepsis and septic shock

EARLY GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY

Initial resuscitation of a patient in severe sepsis or sepsis-inducedtissue hypoperfusion should begin as soon as the syndrome isrecognized

A randomized, controlled trial evaluated the timing of the goal-directed therapy involving adjustments of cardiac preload, afterload, and contractility to balance oxygen delivery with demandprior to admission to the ICU

Page 29: Sepsis and septic shock

EARLY GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY

The goals during the first 6 hours included:

- Central venous pressure of 8 to 12 mm Hg, - Mean arterial pressure of ≥65 mm Hg, - Urine output of ≥0.5 mL/kg/h, and - A central venous or mixed venous oxygen saturation of ≥70%

During the first 6 hours of resuscitation, the early goal-directed therapygroup had a central venous catheter placed and received more fluidthan with traditional therapy (5 versus 3.5 L), dobutamine therapy toa maximum of 20 mcg/kg/min, and red blood cell transfusions

Page 30: Sepsis and septic shock

EARLY GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY

The 28-day mortality rate was 30% in the early goal-directed therapygroup, in comparison to 46.5% in the traditional therapy groupconsisting of fluid resuscitation, followed by vasopressor therapy ifrequired

Increased oxygen delivery from the red blood cell transfusionsto achieve a hematocrit of ≥30% in the early goal-directed therapy group appeared to be the primary difference between the two groups

Page 31: Sepsis and septic shock

EARLY GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY

One institution evaluated the impact of 6-hour sepsis care bundle and found the compliance rate to be 52%

The noncompliant group had a more than twofold increase in hospitalmortality in comparison to the compliant group (49% vs. 23%)

Page 32: Sepsis and septic shock

Thank You